Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/588,136

DETENT SOLENOID

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
ROJAS, BERNARD
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1087 granted / 1309 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1335
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1309 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/27/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/27/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 4, 9, 11-14,16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Isliker [EP 3591673 A1], see machine translation. Claim 1, Isliker discloses a detent solenoid [1], comprising: an armature assembly [7] comprising a groove [15/18]; a coil [3] arranged for displacing the armature assembly [7]; and a detent [10] arranged for seating in the groove [figures 1 and 2]; a housing [4] at least partially surrounding the coil [3]; a cover plate [5] fixed to the housing [4]; and a shaft pilot [11] fixed to the cover plate [5], wherein: the shaft pilot comprises a radial hole [14]; and the detent [10] is disposed in the radial hole [14; figures 1 and 2]. Claim 3, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 1 wherein: the armature assembly [7] comprises: an armature; and a shaft fixed in the armature; and the groove [15/18] is disposed in the shaft [figures 1 and 2]. Claim 4, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 3 wherein the armature is made of a ferrous material [ ferromagnetic armature 7; see highlighted portions of page 3 and 4]. Claim 9, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 1 wherein: the armature assembly [7] comprises an armature; and when the coil [3] is energized [figure 2], at least a portion of the armature [7] is surrounded by the shaft pilot [11; figures 1 and 2]. Claim 11, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 1 further comprising a return spring [8], wherein: the armature assembly [7] comprises an armature ;the return spring is arranged axially between the armature and the shaft pilot [11]; and the return spring is arranged to urge the armature assembly towards a rest position [figure 1]. Claim 12, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 11 wherein: the armature [7] and the shaft pilot [1] comprise respective cylindrical depressions [see figures 1 and 2, the depressions that align spring 8]; and in the rest position [figure 1], a length of the return spring [8] is less than a distance between the respective cylindrical depressions [figures 1 and 2, the ends of the depressions are outside of the spring ends axially]. Claim 13, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 11 wherein, when the coil [3] is energized, the armature [7] is axially displaced towards the shaft pilot [11], compressing the return spring [figure 2]. Claim 14, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 1 wherein the detent [10] is seated in the groove [15/18] when the armature assembly is in a rest position [figure 1]. Claim 16, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 1 further comprising a drawn sleeve [9] fixed in the coil [3] and arranged to guide the armature assembly [7; figures 1 and 2]. Claim 17, Isliker discloses the detent solenoid of claim 1 further comprising a second detent, wherein: the detent and the second detent are disposed circumferentially opposite one another [highlighted portion of page 4]; and respective central axes of the detent and the second detent are aligned so that radial forces from the detent and the second detent acting on the armature assembly are balanced [highlighted portion of page 4]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8 and 10 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Bernard Rojas whose telephone number is (571)272-1998. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. thru Fri. 7:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S Ismail can be reached at (571) 272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BERNARD ROJAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700725
CIRCUIT BREAKER DEVICE AND METHOD
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695015
ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATOR AND VALVE HAVING THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695040
HOUSING ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683106
Rotary-Segment Electromechanical System with Reluctance Boost
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675126
OPERATION MECHANISM AND INPUT DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1309 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month