Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/588,302

PORTABLE TELESCOPIC PUSH-PULL VIBRATING-SHAKING TYPE CAMELLIA OLEIFERA FRUIT PICKING AND BEATING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Priority
Apr 23, 2023 — CN 202310438187.2
Examiner
RUNCO, MADELINE IVY
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Anhui Agricultural University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
198 granted / 256 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
280
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
78.8%
+38.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 256 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections The claims are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 7, line 4 reads “12,000.” and should read –12,000 r/min.-- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claims 1-10, the term “type” in the phrase “telescopic push-pull vibrating-shaking type” renders the claim scope indefinite. Specifically, the term “type” extends the scope of the “telescopic push-pull vibrating-shaking” in a manner that does not have clear metes and bounds, so as to render the claim scope indefinite. Similarly, it is what the term “type” is intended to convey. Claim 2 recites the limitation "a telescopic rod fixing hole" in the final line of the claim. However, it is not clear if this is the same component as “a telescopic rod fixing hole" set forth in claim 1 line 7. Specifically, it is unclear if these components are one and the same, or two different fixing holes altogether. The terms “high performance” and “special” in claim 10 are a relative terms which render the claim indefinite. The term “high performance” and “special” are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20130199812 A1 discloses a vibrating harvesting machine having a hook. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MADELINE RUNCO whose telephone number is (469)295-9123. The examiner can normally be reached 8-4:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Rocca can be reached at 5712728971. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MADELINE I RUNCO/ Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635608
CONVEYING SYSTEM FOR A FRUIT HARVESTER
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635604
COMBINE WITH A BYPASS DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635612
FLUTED ROTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628742
RAKE FRAME WITH HINGE JOINT CONNECTING FRONT AND REAR FRAME SECTIONS
4y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628740
MULCH DOOR WITH SENSOR
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 11m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 256 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month