Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/588,344

VEHICLE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR MEMBER, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING VEHICLE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR MEMBER, AND PRESS MOLD USED FOR MANUFACTURING VEHICLE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR MEMBER

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD
Art Unit
1754
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Howa Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
613 granted / 921 resolved
+1.6% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 921 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claim 12 is cancelled. Claims 1-15 are pending. Claims 7, 10-11, and 13-15 are withdrawn. In view of the amendment, filed on 03/19/2026, the following objection is withdrawn from the previous office action, mailed on 12/29/2025. Objection to claim 1 Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 03/19/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 11,945,147 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. New Grounds of Rejections Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 5 includes an exact limitation that now is incorporated into amended claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. The following rejections are maintained for the reason of records as given in the previous office action. The bases of these rejections are the same as given in the office action, mailed on 12/29/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or non-obviousness. Claims 1-6 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heikkila et al. (US 2019/0389104) in view of Fujioka et al. (US 2013/0242487) Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) disclose a method of manufacturing a vehicle interior and exterior member (a method of making a vehicle interior component having an integral airbag component and a fibrous decorative covering; ¶ [0170]), the vehicle interior and exterior member, comprising: PNG media_image1.png 424 662 media_image1.png Greyscale a fiber molded body (a natural fiber, plastic composite sheet or substrate 40; ¶ [0121]), and a synthetic resin member (a support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins, a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; ¶ [0123] - ¶ [0124]), wherein the synthetic resin member (62, 68; ¶ [0123] - ¶ [0124]) has a fixed portion (a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; [0123]) which is fixed to a surface of the fiber molded body (a natural fiber, plastic composite sheet or substrate 40; ¶ [0121]), the method comprising the steps of: -providing a fiber laminated body (a laminated sheet 50; ¶ [0123]), wherein the fiber laminated body (50; ¶ [0123]) comprises a fiber layer (a support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) including thermoplastic synthetic resin; -heating the fiber laminated body (the laminated sheet 50 is heated to a second softening temperature in an oven; ¶ [0125]) to soften the fiber laminated body (50); -press molding the softened fiber laminated body (¶ [0126], FIG. 4B: the composite sheet 40 is pressed against the laminated sheet 50 after the steps of providing and the steps of heating) using a press mold (a compression mold 56, ¶ [0122]), wherein the fiber laminated body (the laminated sheet 50 including a foam layer 68 and a support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins) is formed into a three-dimensional face shape; -pressurizing (¶ [0036]) the fiber laminated body (50; ¶ [0123]) in the press mold (a compression mold 56; ¶ [0122]); -injection molding molten synthetic resin (¶ [0126], FIG. 4B: the injection of molten resin in the lower mold half to form the plastic components and runners on the “B” surface) toward the fiber layer (the support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) of the fiber laminated body (the laminated sheet 50) while the fiber laminated body (the laminated sheet 50) is in the press mold (a compression mold 56, ¶ [0122]) to form the fiber molded body (a natural fiber, plastic composite sheet or substrate 40) and the synthetic resin member (the support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; ¶ [0123] - ¶ [0124]), wherein the molten synthetic resin seeps (¶ [0042]) into a part of the fiber layer (the support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) of the fiber molded body (40) that faces the fixed portion (a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; [0123]) of the synthetic resin member (a support or outer skin layer 62, a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; ¶ [0123] - ¶ [0124]); and -solidifying molten synthetic resin (the polymer melt begins to solidify when in contact with the cavity surface ¶ [0038]) in the mold (a compression mold 56; ¶ [0122]) -wherein the synthetic resin member (the support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins, a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68) is solidified in a state where the synthetic resin member (the support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins, a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68) includes gas bubbles therein (as foam layer is formed of gas bubbles). Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) disclose a second stage pressure occurs after the initial packing pressure and is necessary during the early stages of the cooling of the molded part to counteract polymer contraction. It is required until the mold gate freezes; the injection pressure can then be released (¶ [0037]); however, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) is silent on explicitly disclosing the step of cooling the fiber laminated body (the laminated sheet 50) in the press mold (a compression mold 56) after the press molding step, as claimed in claim 1, and further, is silent on explicitly disclosing the molten synthetic resin includes a foaming agent and/or a gas configured to form a gas bubbles in the molten synthetic resin, as claimed in claim 1. In the analogous art, Fujioka et al. (US ‘487) disclose a method for producing metal composite by heating and pressurizing a preform including a sheet substrate containing at least one thermosetting resin selected from the group consisting of epoxy resin, phenol resin, benzoxazine resin and unsaturated polyester resin (¶ [0026]) comprising the steps of: -a step 1 (¶ [0027]) for placing the preform in a mold and heating the metal material so as to raise its surface temperature in excess of 180 ̊C. while semi-curing the thermosetting resin, -a step 2 (¶ [0028]) for applying a pressure to the preform being heated in the step 1 to form the metal composite, and -a step 3 (¶ [0029]) for cooling down the metal composite molded in the step 2 under pressure so as to lower the surface temperature of the metal material. PNG media_image2.png 630 422 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, as to claim 1, Fujioka et al. (US ‘487) disclose cooling and pressurizing the fiber laminated body (preform 10 comprising the metal material 1 and the sheet substrate 2; ¶ [0164]) in the press mold (the upper mold 11 and the lower mold 12; ¶ [0164]) Further, as claims 1 and 5, Fujioka et al. (US ‘487) teach the molten synthetic resin includes a foaming agent (¶ [0200]) It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the time of Applicant’s invention, to modify the press molding step, as taught by Heikkila et al. (US ‘104), through cooling the fiber laminated body is in the press mold and providing the molten synthetic resin with a foaming agent in order to lower the surface temperature of the metal material to cause the thermoplastic resin to strongly be bonded to the metal materials during cooling inside the mold, as suggested by Fujioka et al. (US ‘487) (¶ [0029] and ¶ [0204]) As to claim 2, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) teach a portion of the molten synthetic resin (¶ [0141]) nearer to the fiber layer (a support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) is cooled slower than a portion of the molten synthetic resin (¶ [0141]) spaced apart from the fiber layer (a support or outer skin layer 68 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) as it is known that the fiber layer (a support or outer skin layer 62) has a lower heat conduction. As to claim 3, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) disclose the molten synthetic resin seeps (¶ [0042]) into the part of the fiber layer (a support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) of the fiber molded body (40) that faces the fixed portion (a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; [0123]) of the synthetic resin member (a support or outer skin layer 62, a plastic cushioning or foam layer 68; ¶ [0123] - ¶ [0124]) by injecting a quantity of the molten synthetic resin sufficient to cause a portion of the molten synthetic resin to seep into the fiber layer. (see ¶ [0042]) As to claim 4, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) teach the fiber laminated body (the laminated sheet 50; ¶ [0123]) consists of a single fiber layer including thermoplastic synthetic resin (¶ [0124]: the support or outer skin layer 62 may be suitable thermoplastic materials including poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]). As to claim 6, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) teach the bubbles located in an inside of the synthetic resin member are relatively larger than the gas bubbles located adjacent a surface of the synthetic resin member. (foamed materials of polyurethane or epoxy resins, ¶ [0010]) As to claim 8, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) disclose a melting point of the thermoplastic synthetic resin (a first melting temperature; ¶ [0062]) is the same or greater than a melting point of the synthetic resin (a second melting temperature; ¶ [0062]). As to claim 9, Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) teach the press mold (a compression mold 56; ¶ [0122]) comprises an injection molding portion (a lower mold half 54; ¶ [0133]) and a molding portion (recesses 80; ¶ [0133]), the press mold (a compression mold 56; ¶ [0122]) is configured by combining the injection molding portion (the lower mold half 54; ¶ [0133]) and the molding portion (receptables 80; ¶ [0133]), wherein the injection molding portion (the lower mold half 54; ¶ [0133]) comprises a ferrous material or cast iron, wherein the injection molding portion has passages (passages 80 of the lower mold half 54; ¶ [0133]), the passages (80; ¶ [0133]) being configured to inject the molten synthetic resin toward the fiber layer (the support or outer skin layer 62 comprising poly-urethane resins and other co-polymers; ¶ [0124]) of the fiber laminated body (a laminated sheet 50; ¶ [0123]), wherein the molding portion (passages 80 of the lower mold half 54; ¶ [0133]) has a portion comprising aluminum alloy, wherein the molding portion (passages 80 of the lower mold half 54; ¶ [0133]]) is configured to mold the fiber laminated body into the three-dimensional face shape. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, filed on 03/19/2026, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments are mainly directed to the newly added limitation to claim 1 and that neither reference of Heikkila et al. (US ‘104) and Fujioka et al. (US ‘487) disclose the molten synthetic resin includes a foaming agent and/or a gas configured to form gas bubbles in the molten synthetic resin, as claimed in claims 1 and 5. However, the arguments are not persuasive as Fujioka et al. (US ‘487) disclose “the thermoplastic resin may also contain fillers and additives as necessary according to the application… examples of a filler or additive include… foaming agent” (¶ [0200]). Finally, after a full review of the submitted remarks in view of prior art rejections, it has been concluded that there are differences in interpreting the claimed subject matter and the cited references by the Applicant and the Office. Therefore, Examiner would like to suggest that if Applicant’s Counsel believes an interview can benefit the prosecution of the instant application, Applicant’s Counsel is kindly invited to contact the undersigned examiner. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEYED MASOUD MALEKZADEH whose telephone number is (571)272-6215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SUSAN D. LEONG can be reached at (571)270-1487. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEYED MASOUD MALEKZADEH/Primary Examiner Art Unit 1754 04/04/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595181
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AEROGEL BLANKET
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589538
MOLD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589544
Three-piece mold device, system, and method for manufacturing of connectable beverage bottle
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589524
PROCESSING METHOD OF RECYCLING PET MATERIAL FROM BAGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578637
ROLL-TO-ROLL NANOIMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY TOOLS AND PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.7%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month