Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/588,456

INK JET INK, INK SET, IMAGE RECORDING METHOD, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING LAMINATE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
SHAH, MANISH S
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1162 granted / 1355 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1383
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1355 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Katayama et al. (# WO/2013008691 A1). Katayama et al. discloses: 18. An ink jet ink (aqueous white ink; see Abstract) comprising: Water (see Abstract); a white pigment (see Abstract; page: 2, para [0006]); and at least two kinds of resins (binder Acrylic resin; page 5-6 & styrene based copolymer; page: 4; see Examples), wherein the ink jet ink has an acid value of 8.0 mgKOH/g or less (see Preparation Example | at paragraph 132 and Example | at paragraph 151): the ink contains 30% white pigment paste, water, 13.3% of R-3 resin, wherein the R-3 resin has an acid value of 18 mgKOH/g... the dispersion resin Disper byk-190 in the preparation of the white pigment paste and 25 parts of the dispersion resin in the total of 200 parts. It is well known in the art that the acid value of the dispersion resin Disper byk-190 is 10 mgKOH/g and the acid value of the ink is calculated from the composition of Example 1, i.e. The acid value of the ink is 10 mgKOH/g x (25/200) x (0/100) + 10 mgKOH/g x (13.3/200) = 2.77 mgKOH/g (i.e. Acid value is 1.5 mgKOH/g to 8.0 mgKOH/g), and the inkjet ink contains particles of acrylic acid (page: 6; see Examples). The Examiner draws particular attention to the Applicant that "Katayama et al. does address a pigment, water, resin, dispersant resin and surfactant, it teaches a laundry list of possible pigment, water, resin, dispersant resin and surfactant. The format in which Katayama et al. presents its teaching does not change the fact that it teaches the claimed invention. It is not necessary for Katayama et al. to present its teaching in an example format citing it in a list is sufficient. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, absent evidence to the contrary, to choose any of the pigment, water, resin, dispersant resin and surfactant from the list and any additives from the list, including those presently claimed, and thereby arrive at the claimed invention. However, "applicant must look to the whole reference for what it teaches. Applicant cannot merely rely on the examples and argue that the reference did not teach others." In re Courtright, 377 19. An ink set comprising: a first ink which is the ink jet ink according to claim 18; and a second ink which is an ink jet ink comprising water, a pigment other than a white pigment, and a resin (see Page 12; Examples). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17 are allowed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANISH S SHAH whose telephone number is (571)272-2152. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricardo Magallanes can be reached at 571-272-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MANISH S. SHAH Primary Examiner Art Unit 2853 /Manish S Shah/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595386
AQUEOUS INK, INK CARTRIDGE AND INK JET RECORDING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590215
INK FOR INK-JET TEXTILE PRINTING, METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRINTED MATTER USING SAID INK, AND ARTICLE WITH ADHERED IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584030
Ink Jet Ink Composition And Recording Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584032
REACTION LIQUID AND INK JET RECORDING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583222
SOLVENT COMPATIBLE NOZZLE PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+7.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1355 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month