Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/588,485

Wheel With High Strength Flexible Spokes

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
KOTTER, KIP T
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Spinergy Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
945 granted / 1396 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1446
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1396 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Amendment The amendment filed 25 March 2026 is objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132(a) because it introduces new matter into the disclosure. 35 U.S.C. 132(a) states that no amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention. The added material which is not supported by the original disclosure is as follows: The newly added paragraph after paragraph [0021] of the specification. Specifically, there is no support in the original disclosure for a single alternative embodiment of the wheel which includes “a spherical nipple sized to be fully received within the rim and formed with a keyway to receive a key when secured during assembly of the wheel” in combination with “the spherical nipple rotating within the rim to accommodate the angular positioning of a woven spoke” (emphasis added). The newly added Figure 11. Specifically, there is no support in the original disclosure for a single embodiment of the wheel having the anchor, tube and nipple structure shown in combination with a spoke with a braided and/or woven fiber shaft as shown. Further, there is no support in the original disclosure for a spoke having the specific braid or weave pattern shown in Figure 11. Applicant is required to cancel the new matter in the reply to this Office Action. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “rounded nipple” having “threading on an external body of the nipple that corresponds with threading on an internal surface of the plurality of nipple receivers” as set forth in claim 1 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). The only “rounded” nipple shown in the drawings (note Figs. 8, 9 and newly added Fig. 11, where the rounded nipple is labeled with reference character 500 in Fig. 8) does not have threading on an external body as claimed. Instead, it is shown to have internal threading that corresponds to external threading of a tube 170 that is received within the rounded nipple. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: The specification does not describe the claimed “nipple receivers” as set forth in claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. 5. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 6. Claims 1-3 and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, there is no support in the original disclosure for “a rounded nipple connecting each of the plurality of flexible spoke assemblies to the rim and having threading on an external body of the nipple that corresponds with threading on an internal surface of the plurality of nipple receivers. The only “rounded” nipple disclosed (note Figs. 8, 9 and newly added Fig. 11, where the rounded nipple is labeled with reference character 500 in Fig. 8) does not have threading on an external body as claimed. Instead, it is shown to have internal threading that corresponds to external threading of a tube 170 that is received within the rounded nipple. Moreover, regarding claim 1, there is no support in the original disclosure for the claimed nipple receivers and nipple structure (i.e., a plurality of nipple receivers located at each of the plurality of spoke holes on the rim” and the “rounded nipple” having “threading on an external body of the nipple that corresponds with threading on an internal surface of the plurality of nipple receivers”) being used in combination with “each of said plurality of flexible spoke assemblies comprises a braided fiber shaft” as required. Moreover, there is no support in the original disclosure for the claimed anchor structure (i.e., “formed with a bore to attach to the second end of each of the plurality of flexible spoke assemblies”) being used in combination with “each of said plurality of flexible spoke assemblies comprises a braided fiber shaft” as required. In other words, while Applicant’s drawings show embodiments with nipple structure and anchor structure, there is no support for Applicant’s claimed nipple structure and anchor structure being used with the claimed “braided fiber shaft” arrangement of claims 1-3 which is only disclosed in the incorporation by reference to US 5,110,190 (See lines 12-14 of page 3 of the specification). Further, regarding claims 7-9, there is no support for the claimed hub structure and relationship between the anchor and hub structure (i.e., “the hub further comprises a right flange and a left flange”, “a plurality of flange holes that are distributed across the right flange and the left flange”, and “the anchor is configured to attached to a corresponding flange hole of the plurality of flange holes” being used in combination with “each of said plurality of flexible spoke assemblies comprises a braided fiber shaft” as required. Response to Arguments 7. Applicant's arguments filed 25 March 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to Applicant’s argument that there is support for the rounded nipple in “Johnson Figures 2 and 3, as well as original Figures 8 and 9, and in the Specification in paragraphs [0047] through [0051]”, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. Specifically, neither Figs. 2 and 3 of Johnson, nor Figs. 8 and 9 and the corresponding description in the instant application, disclose a “rounded nipple” having “threading on an external body of the nipple that corresponds with threading on an internal surface of the plurality of nipple receivers” as required by claim 1. In response to Applicant’s generalized argument regarding the rejections under 35 USC 112, first paragraph, that “Applicant has set forth the detailed support for the claims”, the Examiner respectfully disagrees and notes that Applicant has failed to point out where there is support for a single embodiment of the wheel that has the claimed “nipple receivers”, “rounded nipple” and “anchor” structure in combination with spoke assemblies that comprise “a braided fiber shaft”. As noted above, there is no support in the original disclosure, including the Johnson reference which was incorporated by reference, for spoke assemblies comprising “a braided fiber shaft” being used with the claimed “nipple receivers”, “rounded nipple” and “anchor” structure. Furthermore, there is no support in the original disclosure, including the Johnson reference which was incorporated by reference, for the newly claimed “rounded nipple” having “threading on an external body of the nipple that corresponds with threading on an internal surface of the plurality of nipple receivers” as required by claim 1. Conclusion 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIP T KOTTER whose telephone number is (571)272-7953. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-6 EST Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samuel (Joe) J Morano can be reached at (571)272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kip T Kotter/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 09, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Feb 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Nov 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600166
WHEEL CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600167
SPOKE FOR NON-PNEUMATIC TIRE WITH ADHESION DEFLECTOR AND REINFORCEMENT LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600168
WHEEL ASSEMBLY WITH ELLIPTICAL SPOKES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600420
SLIDER WHEEL HAVING A PLURALITY OF SLIDER SURFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583539
CRAWLER TRACK, SHOE, TRACK LINK, UNDERCARRIAGE ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH A POWER SUPPLY UNIT FOR POWERING SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1396 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month