Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/588,603

Horticulture Tray Support System

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
HAYES, KRISTEN C
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Blackmore Company Inc.
OA Round
3 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
857 granted / 1250 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1299
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1250 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 15 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by CN 203446283 (hereinafter CN ‘283). Regarding claim 15, CN ‘283 discloses a movable horticulture tray carrier system comprising: a plurality of horticulture trays (2), each one of the plurality of horticulture trays defining a plurality of growing cells with gaps therebetween (CN ‘283, Figure 2); and a stand including (3): a plurality of vertical supports (CN ‘283, Figure 2) evenly spaced apart along a length of the stand; first and second horizontal (3) supports extending in parallel along an entirety of the length of the stand between at least two of the plurality of vertical supports (CN ‘283, Figure 1), the first and the second horizontal supports spaced apart such that when the plurality of horticulture trays are seated on the stand the first horizontal support sits in a first one of the gaps and the second horizontal support sits in a second one of the gaps (CN ‘283, Figure 2); and wherein the stand is configured to support the plurality of horticulture trays above a surface that the plurality of vertical supports are seated on to provide an air gap between a lower surface of each one of the plurality of growing cells and the surface that the plurality of vertical supports are seated on (CN ‘283, Figure 2), the air gap facilitates root pruning, facilitates lateral root growth to reduce root circling, and facilitates disease prevention of plants being grown in the plurality of growing cells; the plurality of horticultural trays and the stand are configured such that an outer edge of each one of the plurality of horticulture trays extends beyond the stand such that the plurality of horticulture trays abut adjacent horticulture trays of an adjacent stand (CN ‘283: Figure 1); and the stand being configured to support the plurality of horticulture trays such that they directly abut each other. Regarding claim 16, CN ‘283 further discloses each one of the plurality of vertical supports includes two side portions (CN ‘283, Figure 2) that are spaced apart and extend vertically, and a crossbar connecting the two side portions (CN ‘283, Figure 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 21 and 22 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to disclose or suggest the claimed invention having an inwardly extending foot or the spacing and orientation of the horticultural trays. JP 2009219400 fails to disclose an additional frame. The frame of JP 2009219400 expands to support additional trays, negating the need for an additional frame. Conclusion Applicant's submission of an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97(c) with the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p) on 09/15/2025 prompted the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 609.04(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRISTEN C HAYES whose telephone number is (571)272-7881. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michener Joshua can be reached at 571.272.1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRISTEN C HAYES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 16, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 24, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599802
TRAINING MECHANISM AND ROBOT FOR WATER-BASED LOWER-LIMB REHABILITATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599114
Cover for a Retractable Dog Leash
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588603
INTERENGAGEABLE CONTAINERS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582850
CABLE SLEEVE FOR FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582058
PRODUCTION FACILITY LAYOUTS FOR AUTOMATED CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT AGRICULTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1250 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month