Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/588,854

PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR SCRUBBING A GAS STREAM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2023 — FR 2301845
Examiner
FIORITO, JAMES A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
530 granted / 740 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
770
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 740 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-8 in the reply filed on 8/3/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 5, the phrases “the top” and “the tower” lack antecedent basis in the claims. It is unclear whether “the tower” refers to the “the scrubbing tower”. In claim 1, line 6-7, the phrases “the bottom” and “the tower” lack antecedent basis in the claims. It is unclear whether “the tower” refers to the “the scrubbing tower”. In claim 1, line 11, the phrase “is used to cool” is unclear as to scope. It appears the phrase is intended to establish that a liquid cools an air flow. However, it is unclear whether the cooling step is required by the claim because subsequent claims require that cooling is prohibited under certain condition (See dependent claims 6 and 7). The Office interprets the claim to require that a liquid stream cools an air flow. In claim 3, line 2, the phrase “the last stage” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 3, line 4, the phrase “the gas stream upstream” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 3, line 4, the phrase “the tower (K)” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 3, line 5, the phrase “the tower” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 3, line 7, the phrase “the gas containing oxygen and/or nitrogen and/or carbon monoxide” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 4, line 2, the phrase “the vaporization” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 5, line 3, the phrase “the vaporization” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 6, line 3 and 4, the phrase “the ambient temperature” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 7, line 3, the phrase “the ambient temperature” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. In claim 8, line 1, the phrase “the liquid flow” lacks antecedent basis in the claims. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 6 and 7 require that the cooling is not performed, which is a requirement of claim 1. Thus, claims 6 and 7 broaden the scope of claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CA 2691802 teaches a process of separating CO2 form other flue gases and particulates (Abstract). At least gases such as SO2 and particulates are removed from the flue gas via scrubbing (page 7, l. 20-30). The CO2 is recovered by condensation of a pressurized stream containing the enriched CO2 (Page 8). The process may include a cooling step in order to minimize the flow through water condensation (Page 7, l. 28-30). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A FIORITO whose telephone number is (571)272-9921. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A FIORITO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741869
SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE PRODUCTION METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735324
RUTHENIUM PROMOTER CATALYST COMPOSITIONS
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735326
HIGH-PERFORMANCE SODIUM ION ELECTROLYTES AND EFFICIENT METHODS FOR MAKING THE SAME
11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729123
Method for Obtaining Bimodal Mesoporous Materials Based on Silicon Oxides Using Microwave Radiation
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729130
DOPED RARE EARTH-CONTAINING MATERIALS AND THEIR PROPERTIES
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 740 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month