Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/589,656

STRETCH BLOW-MOLDED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING STRETCH BLOW-MOLDED ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Examiner
BRADEN, SHAWN M
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
736 granted / 1114 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1145
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1114 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, in the reply filed on 09/19/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 7-9, are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected. Claim Interpretation Intrinsic viscosity of PET, background: PNG media_image1.png 426 882 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yamamoto (US Pub No 2017/0267436). With respect to claim 1, Yamamoto shows a stretch blow-molded article (paragraph 210) comprising: a first polyester (1); and a second polyester (3) having a structure different from a structure of the first polyester (layers determined by need, but disclosed as different structure and composition in each layer based on end user’s needs), wherein an intrinsic viscosity value of the first polyester is 0.60 to 0.74 dL/g, (paragraph 72, .5 - 2 dL/g) and the second polyester has a structure corresponding to terephthalic acid and a structure corresponding (very broad term) to bisphenol A (paragraph 39). With respect to claim 2, Yamamoto shows wherein the first polyester comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of polyethylene terephthalate (disclosed paragraph 3) and polyethylene naphthalate. With respect to claim 3, Yamamoto shows 3. The stretch blow-molded article according to claim 1, wherein a content of the second polyester is 0.005 to 1.00 mass% (.01-3% mass, disclosed in paragraph 25), relative to a total of the first polyester and the second polyester. With respect to claim 4, Yamamoto shows wherein the first polyester is recycled polyester (paragraph 5). With respect to claim 5, Yamamoto shows wherein the stretch blow-molded article is a toner bottle. (this limitation is interpreted as an intended use, and the reference is capable of holding toner, yet it is not disclosed) (see MPEP 2173.05(g) copied below) PNG media_image2.png 244 624 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to claim 6, Yamamoto shows wherein the stretch blow-molded article comprises carbon black. (this limitation is interpreted as an intended use, and the reference is capable of holding carbon black, yet it is not disclosed) (see MPEP 2173.05(g) copied above) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAWN M BRADEN whose telephone number is (571)272-8026. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E Aviles-Bosques can be reached at 571 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAWN M BRADEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600520
JAR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584437
TOROID SURGE TANK WITH INVERTED DIVIDER WALL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583655
FILL PORT WITH CRYOGENIC SEAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577038
FOLDING TRANSPORT CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580163
MEMBER FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1114 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month