Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/589,871

LINEAR COMPONENT INSTALLATION/UNINSTALLATION USING PRESSURIZED SLEEVE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Examiner
KASENGE, CHARLES R
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1110 granted / 1321 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1347
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1321 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 7/7/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of the claim(s) under 35 U.S.C. 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Albeck et al. 2007/0031024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aoki et al. U.S. PGPub 2017/0196436 (hereinafter “Aoki”) in view of Albeck et al. 2007/0031024 (hereinafter “Albeck”). Regarding claims 1, 11 and 16, Aoki discloses a method is provided for pressurized routing linear components (e.g. Fig. 1-3), the method comprising: obtaining data (e.g. graphs) related to a project (e.g. ¶80-81; Fig. 1, 10 and 13-14); extracting features from the obtained project data, wherein the extracted features include linear component characteristics (e.g. hard/soft tube) and project environment characteristics (e.g. pressure inside tube) (e.g. ¶80-81; Fig. 1, 10 and 13-14); obtaining a project design, based on at least one of user input (e.g. operator voice instructions) and predetermined extracted features from the extracted features from the obtained project data, wherein the project design includes installation or uninstallation of a linear component (e.g. elastic tube body) in relation to an apparatus (e.g. camera/endoscope) (e.g. ¶111-115); calculating pressurization of a plurality of pouches (e.g. elastic tube) disposed in a pressurized sleeve (e.g. ¶176-177, mesh sheet) for the installation or uninstallation of the linear component in relation to the apparatus based on the project design (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23); and implementing the calculated pressurization of the plurality of pouches disposed in the pressurized sleeve (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Aoki does not explicitly disclose a confirmation process, via a connection orientation fixture laser, that confirms a terminal end of a linear component is adjacent to a connection point. Albeck discloses using a laser based scanning system to inspect physical characteristics of a product (e.g. ¶1-2 and 33). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use Albeck’s laser scanning system to scan Aoki’s medical instrument, which would include monitoring connection points. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this in order to ensure the medical instrument is manufactured to the desired characteristics. Therefore, it would have been obvious to modify Aoki with Albeck to obtain the invention as specified in claims 1-20. Regarding claims 2, 12 and 17, Aoki discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the obtained project design is modified or optimized based at least partially on at least one of mitigating calculated risks, feasibility, and optimal project element routes (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Regarding claims 3, 13 and 18, Aoki discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the mitigated calculated risks are based on precise values that are otherwise imperceivable to a human operator by bare observation (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23, wherein values related to internal organs are imperceivable). Regarding claims 4, 14 and 19, Aoki discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the calculated pressurization of the pouches disposed in the pressurized sleeve includes calculated adjustments to at least one of manifold openings, apertures of the manifold openings, a compressor, and a pump, and wherein the pressurization of the pouches is a requisite hydrostatic pressure (e.g. ¶111-115). Regarding claims 5, 15 and 20, Aoki discloses the method of claim 4, wherein the calculated pressurization is based on inducing a shape of the linear component included in the project design (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Regarding claim 6, Aoki discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the induced shape of the linear component included in the project design includes a route, bends, angles, installation or uninstallation points, and 3D spatial positioning (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Regarding claim 7, Aoki discloses the method of claim 6, wherein the bends include opposing regions of pressurized tension and compression (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Regarding claim 8, Aoki discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the pressurized sleeve at least partially surrounds the linear component, wherein the plurality of pouches is disposed in the pressurized sleeve, wherein at least two pouches of the plurality of pouches have different hydrostatic pressures from one another which induce axial movement of at least a portion of the pressurized sleeve and a corresponding portion of the at least partially surrounded linear component (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Regarding claim 9, Aoki discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the linear component characteristics include linear component dimensions, a linear component minimum bend radius, and a linear component composition (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23). Regarding claim 10, Aoki discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the project design includes at least one predetermined axial movement of at least a portion of the at least one linear component and calculated pressurization values and positions within at least a portion of the pressurized sleeve necessary to achieve the predetermined axial movement (e.g. ¶239-240; Fig. 1-3, 9, 18 and 21-23) without exceeding a predetermined damage threshold of the at least one linear component (e.g. ¶116). Relevant Prior Art Barrish et al. U.S. PGPub 2017/0157361 discloses a method is provided for pressurized routing linear components, the method comprising: obtaining data related to a project; extracting features from the obtained project data, wherein the extracted features include linear component characteristics and project environment characteristics; obtaining a project design, based on at least one of user input and predetermined extracted features from the extracted features from the obtained project data, wherein the project design includes installation or uninstallation of a linear component in relation to an apparatus; calculating pressurization of a plurality of pouches disposed in a pressurized sleeve for the installation or uninstallation of the linear component in relation to the apparatus based on the project design; and implementing the calculated pressurization of the plurality of pouches disposed in the pressurized sleeve (e.g. ¶175-176; Fig. 4C-5, 12A and 12B). Hawkes et al. U.S. PGPub 2019/0217908 discloses a method is provided for pressurized routing linear components, the method comprising: obtaining data related to a project; extracting features from the obtained project data, wherein the extracted features include linear component characteristics and project environment characteristics; obtaining a project design, based on at least one of user input and predetermined extracted features from the extracted features from the obtained project data, wherein the project design includes installation or uninstallation of a linear component in relation to an apparatus; calculating pressurization of a plurality of pouches disposed in a pressurized sleeve for the installation or uninstallation of the linear component in relation to the apparatus based on the project design; and implementing the calculated pressurization of the plurality of pouches disposed in the pressurized sleeve (e.g. ¶20, 26, 28 and 42; Fig. 1A-1C and 7). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES R KASENGE whose telephone number is (571)272-3743. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CK September 14, 2026 /CHARLES R KASENGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 25, 2026
Interview Requested
Jul 07, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750989
ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE TEMPERATURE OF DRIVE SYSTEM COMPONENTS OF SUCH AN ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12730423
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING AN OPERATION BASED ON SENSOR SIGNAL DATA
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730420
SOFTWARE ROBOT ORCHESTRATION ENGINE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727116
ZONED HEAT DISSIPATION CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WATER COOLING RADIATOR AND WATER COOLING HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM HAVING THE ZONED HEAT DISSIPATION CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715730
ELEVATOR AND ESCALATOR CONTROL NETWORK MANAGEMENT
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 10m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1321 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month