Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/590,329

BIAS POWER REGULATOR CIRCUIT FOR ISOLATED CONVERTERS WITH A WIDE OUTPUT VOLTAGE RANGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Priority
Oct 17, 2018 — provisional 62/746,876 +2 more
Examiner
LUONG, HENRY T
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 655 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
91.7%
+51.7% vs TC avg
§102
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/06/26 has been entered. This Office Action is in response to the amendment filed on 12/08/25. Examiner acknowledged that claims 1 and 11 are amended; claim 17 is canceled. Currently, claims 1-16 and 18-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koike (US 2002/0067629). PNG media_image1.png 459 683 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 444 654 media_image2.png Greyscale Examiner Markup Fig. 15 Examiner Markup Fig. 2 Regarding Claim 11, Koike teaches a circuit comprising: a transistor (Fig. 17: 3) having a first current terminal, a second current terminal, and a control terminal, the first current terminal coupled to a diode and an inductor (Fig. 17: 17, 14); a current sense circuit (Fig. 17: 6) coupled to the second current terminal; and a control circuit (Fig. 17: 7) coupled to the control terminal, to the current sense circuit (Fig. 17: 7 connect to the gate terminal of 3 and current sense 6 via node 30). Koike does not explicitly teaches in Fig. 17 the control circuit coupled to the diode, and to the inductor. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to understand that the control circuit 7 is electrically couple to the diode as well as the inductor via ground through resistor 39 and the current sense circuit 6 (see above). Regarding Claim 12, Koike teaches the circuit of claim 11, wherein the control circuit comprises: modulation circuitry (Fig. 17: 7 provides pulse switching pulses) coupled to the current sense circuit, and to the control terminal; and a mode controller (Fig. 17: 11) coupled to the modulation circuitry. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 and 16, 18-20 are allowed. Claims 13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENRY T LUONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7008. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday: 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at (571) 270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Henry Luong/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 03, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633659
PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635044
VOLTAGE DOUBLING CIRCUIT FOR POWERING A LOAD
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620709
FULL-DUPLEX CIRCULAR PARASITIC ARRAY ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620712
MULTILAYER BOARD AND ANTENNA MODULE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621918
MODULES FOR A LUMINAIRE, LUMINAIRE AND SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month