Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/590,836

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Examiner
BERNSTEIN, ALLISON
Art Unit
2824
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kioxia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
719 granted / 889 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
904
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 889 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
►DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from further consideration. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 30 December 2025 is acknowledged. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement(s) (IDS), Form PTO-1449, filed 28 February 2024. The information therein was considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. ►Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shirakawa et al. (US 2020/0098432) (hereinafter, “Shirakawa”). Re: claim 1, Shirakawa discloses in figs. 2-5 a semiconductor memory device comprising: a first semiconductor pillar (MP1); a second semiconductor pillar (MP9); a first string (fig. 5) provided on a first side of the first semiconductor pillar (side of MP1 coupled to 11-2), and including a plurality of first memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a second string (fig. 5) provided on a second side of the first semiconductor pillar (side of MP1 coupled to 11-3), and including a plurality of second memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a third string (fig. 5) provided on a first side of the second semiconductor pillar (side of MP9 coupled to 11-4), and including a plurality of third memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a fourth string (fig. 5) provided on a second side of the second semiconductor pillar (side of MP9 coupled to 11-3), and including a plurality of fourth memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a plurality of first word lines (including 11-2, 11-4, WLe0-WLe7, SU2), each of the first word lines electrically connected in common to one of the plurality of first memory cells and one of the plurality of third memory cells; a plurality of second word lines (including 11-3, WLo0-WLo7, SU1), each of the second word lines electrically connected in common to one of the plurality of second memory cells and one of the plurality of fourth memory cells; and a driver configured to supply different voltages to the first and second word lines during an erasing operation to erase data in the plurality of second memory cells and the plurality of fourth memory cells, wherein in the erasing operation, the driver supplies a first voltage higher than a reference voltage to the plurality of first word lines, and supplies the reference voltage to the plurality of second word lines (A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. MPEP § 2114.). Re: claim 2, Shirakawa discloses in figs. 2-5 the semiconductor memory device according to claim 1, further comprising: a third semiconductor pillar (MP3); a fourth semiconductor pillar (MP10); a fifth string (fig. 5) provided on a first side of the third semiconductor pillar (side of MP3 coupled to 11-6), and including a plurality of fifth memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a sixth string (fig. 5) provided on a second side of the third semiconductor pillar (side of MP3 coupled to 11-7), and including a plurality of sixth memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a seventh string (fig. 5) provided on a first side of the fourth semiconductor pillar (side of MP10 coupled to 11-6), and including a plurality of seventh memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); an eighth string (fig. 5) provided on a second side of the fourth semiconductor pillar (side of MP10 coupled to 11-5), and including a plurality of eighth memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 5); a plurality of third word lines (including 11-6, WLe0-WLe7, SU4), each of the third word lines electrically connected in common to one of the plurality of fifth memory cells and one of the plurality of seventh memory cells; and a plurality of fourth word lines (including 11-5, 11-7, SU3), each of the fourth word lines electrically connected in common to one of the plurality of sixth memory cells and one of the plurality of eighth memory cells, wherein in the erasing operation, the driver supplies the first voltage to the plurality of third word lines (A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. MPEP § 2114.). Re: claim 3, Shirakawa discloses in figs. 3-5 the semiconductor memory device according to claim 2, wherein in the erasing operation, the driver disconnects the plurality of fourth word lines from a voltage supply so that the third word lines are maintained in a floating state (A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. MPEP § 2114.). Re: claim 4, Shirakawa discloses in figs. 3-5 the semiconductor memory device according to claim 3, wherein a voltage of the fourth word lines increases to the first voltage during the erasing operation (A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. MPEP § 2114.). Re: claim 5, Shirakawa discloses in figs. 3-5 the semiconductor memory device according to claim 2, wherein the first, second, third, and fourth semiconductor pillars extend in a first direction and are aligned in a second direction that is orthogonal to the first direction, and the first, second, third, and fourth word lines are stacked in the first direction (fig. 5). ►Claim(s) 1 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Futatsuyama et al. (US 2018/0277565) (hereinafter, “Futatsuyama”). Re: claim 1, Futatsuyama discloses in figs. 2-4 a semiconductor memory device comprising: a first semiconductor pillar (MP1); a second semiconductor pillar (MP2); a first string (fig. 2) provided on a first side of the first semiconductor pillar (side of MP1 coupled to 11-3), and including a plurality of first memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 2); a second string (fig. 2) provided on a second side of the first semiconductor pillar (side of MP1 coupled to 11-4), and including a plurality of second memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 2); a third string (fig. 2) provided on a first side of the second semiconductor pillar (side of MP2 coupled to 11-5), and including a plurality of third memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 2); a fourth string (fig. 2) provided on a second side of the second semiconductor pillar (side of MP2 coupled to 11-6), and including a plurality of fourth memory cells electrically connected in series (fig. 2); a plurality of first word lines (including 11-3, 11-5, WLo0-WLo7), each of the first word lines electrically connected in common to one of the plurality of first memory cells and one of the plurality of third memory cells; a plurality of second word lines (including 11-4, 11-6, WLe0-WLe7), each of the second word lines electrically connected in common to one of the plurality of second memory cells and one of the plurality of fourth memory cells; and a driver configured to supply different voltages to the first and second word lines during an erasing operation to erase data in the plurality of second memory cells and the plurality of fourth memory cells, wherein in the erasing operation, the driver supplies a first voltage higher than a reference voltage to the plurality of first word lines, and supplies the reference voltage to the plurality of second word lines (A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. MPEP § 2114.). Re: claim 12, Futatsuyama discloses in figs. 2-5 the semiconductor memory device according to claim 1, wherein the first and second semiconductor pillars (MP1, MP2) extend in a first direction (Z-direction) and are aligned in a second direction (Y-direction) that is orthogonal to the first direction, and the first and second word lines (including 11-3, 11-5 and 11-4, 11-6) are stacked in the first direction (Z-direction) and each have finger portions (11-3, 11-5 and 11-4, 11-6) that extend in a third direction (X-direction) that is orthogonal to the first and second directions, and the first semiconductor pillar (MP1) is disposed in a first boundary region that is between one of the finger portions (11-3) of the first word line and one of the finger portions (11-4) of the second word line, and the second semiconductor pillar (MP2) is disposed in a second boundary region that is between another one of the finger portions (11-5) of the first word line and another one of the finger portions (11-6) of the second word line. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to teach the claimed limitations in combination namely, as recited in claim 6, the semiconductor memory device according to claim 5, (including wherein the first, second, third and fourth semiconductor pillars are aligned in a second direction), further comprising: a plurality of dummy pillars extending in the first direction disposed in a boundary region that is between the second and third word lines in the second direction and extends in the first direction and a third direction that is orthogonal to the first and second directions; and as recited in claim 8, the semiconductor memory device according to claim 5 (including wherein the first, second, third and fourth semiconductor pillars are aligned in a second direction), further comprising: first and second bit lines extending in the second direction above the first, second, third, and fourth semiconductor pillars, wherein the first bit line is electrically connected to the second and third semiconductor pillars and the second bit line is electrically connected to the first and fourth semiconductor pillars. Conclusion The examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. When responding to this office action, applicants are advised to provide the examiner with the line numbers and page numbers in the application and/or references cited to assist the examiner in locating appropriate paragraphs. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALLISON BERNSTEIN whose telephone number is (571)272-9011. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached on 571-272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALLISON BERNSTEIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824 3/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604676
MEMORY CELL, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING THE SAME, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593624
Resistive random access memory structure and manufacturing method thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593446
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588219
METAL-DOPED SWITCHING DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588179
FLY BITLINE DESIGN FOR PSEUDO TRIPLE PORT MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 889 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month