Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/590,900

RETENTION ASSEMBLIES FOR MATERIAL STORAGE SYSTEMS, AND RELATED MATERIAL CONTAINERS AND METHODS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Examiner
CHEYNEY, CHARLES
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Rivian Ip Holdings LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
452 granted / 799 resolved
-13.4% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
847
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
92.0%
+52.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 799 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 03/18/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 under Ma (US 2024/0151348) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Meyer, teaching a magnet moving with the actuator as evidenced in the rejection below. Applicant's arguments filed 03/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Vanman does not teach amended claim 1 i.e. magnet moving with actuator. However, as recited in paragraph 42 as the actuator moves, the magnet rotates) due to their coupling. Applicant argues that Vanman does not teach claim 2 limitation of “wherein the magnet is configured resist the bias element to hold the actuator in the unlocked position when an accessory (102) is positioned on the retention assembly. However, Vanman teaches the magnets holding the retention device in either a locked or unlocked position thus by holding resists the biasing element from changing the position (Para. 33 & 44, magnet resists the bias element to place in the unlocked position for positioning of an accessory). Further delineation is needed to adequately define the claimed invention from the prior art of record. Election/Restrictions Claims 10-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 10/16/2025. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 25 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, and 5-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vanman (US 2020/0390225 A1). Re: Claim 1, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including a retention assembly, comprising: an actuator (110) mounted to a retention housing (104) (Fig. 1 & 6A, Para. 42, actuator within housing); a locking component (606) coupled to the actuator, the actuator movable to move the locking component between a locked position and an unlocked position (Para. 42, moved between locked and unlocked positions); and a magnet (204) coupled to the actuator (Fig. 6A, Para. 42, magnet with actuator) such that the magnet moves with the actuator (Fig. 6A, Para. 42, as the actuator moves, the magnet rotates). Re: Claim 2, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including a bias element (610) operable to bias the actuator toward the locked position (Para. 44, spring biased to the locking position), wherein the magnet is configured resist the bias element to hold the actuator in the unlocked position when an accessory (102) is positioned on the retention assembly (Para. 33 & 44, magnet resists the bias element to place in the unlocked position for positioning of an accessory). Re: Claim 3, Vanman discloses the claimed invention include a rotatable link (606) pivotably coupled to the locking component; and a transfer link (106) coupled between the rotatable link and the actuator (Figs. 6A-B). Re: Claim 5, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including the rotatable link comprises an extension (602) extending into an opening of the transfer link (Depicted in Fig. 6B). Re: Claim 6, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including the locking component interfaces with a first side of the rotatable link (Fig. 6A); the retention assembly further comprises a second locking component interfacing with a second side of the rotatable link (Fig. 6A, 4 different locking components), the second side opposing the first side (Fig. 6A, opposing sides of the housing); and the rotatable link comprises an extension (602) extending into an opening of the locking component (Fig. 6B). Re: Claim 7, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including the actuator comprises: a handle (110) (Fig. 1); a receptacle having an opening (Depicted in Fig.1), wherein the magnet is disposed in the opening (Fig. 6A, the magnets are within the opening); and a flange abutting against the transfer link (Depicted in 6A, the surface of the handle forming a flange in integral abutment with the transfer link). Re: Claim 8, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including the retention assembly comprises: an extension comprising an outer surface and an opening formed in the outer surface (Depicted in Fig. 1); a second actuator (112) mounted to the retention housing (Fig. 1); and a second locking component disposed in the opening and coupled to the second actuator (Depicted in Fig. 6A, separate locking components for the second actuator). Re: Claim 9, Vanman discloses the claimed invention including the second actuator is movable to move the second locking component between a first position in the opening and a second position (Para. 43, moved between locked and unlocked positions), wherein in the second position the second locking component is at least partially outside of the opening (Depicted in Fig. 6A) and abutting against a vehicle panel (Para. 4, device inherently capable of abutting a vehicle with its accessible attachment structure). Claim(s) 1-4, and 21-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Meyer (US 2025/0052091 A1). Re: Claim 1, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a retention assembly, comprising: an actuator (398) mounted to a retention housing (306) (Fig. 1 & 6A, Para. 54, actuator within housing); a locking component (333) coupled to the actuator, the actuator movable to move the locking component between a locked position (34) and an unlocked position (32) ((Depicted in Fig.1, 7-8, Para. 60, the opening in accessory, Para. 60, moved between locked and unlocked positions); and a magnet (314) coupled to the actuator ((Figs. 7-8, Para. 59, magnet with actuator), such that the magnet moves with the actuator (Figs. 7-8, Para. 59, as the actuator moves so does the magnet, to release the accessory). Re: Claim 2, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a bias element (312) operable to bias the actuator toward the locked position, wherein the magnet is configured resist the bias element to hold the actuator in the unlocked position when an accessory is positioned on the retention assembly (Para. 60, bias element bias toward locking until magnet holds resist said force in the unlocked position). Re: Claim 3, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a rotatable link (386) pivotably coupled to the locking component; and a transfer link (300) coupled between the rotatable link and the actuator (Depicted in Fig. 8). Re: Claim 4, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including the rotatable link is rotatable relative to the retention housing (Depicted in Fig. 7-8, para. 57, rotates), and the transfer link is pivotable relative to the rotatable link and the actuator (Fig. 7-8, para. 58, transfer link may pivot relative to the other components). Re: Claim 21, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a retention assembly, comprising an actuator (398) mounted to a retention housing (306) (Fig. 7 & 8, Para. 54, actuator within housing); a locking component (333) coupled to the actuator, the actuator movable to move the locking component between: a locked position (34) where the locking component extends into an opening of an accessory (12) ((Depicted in Fig.1, 7-8, Para. 60, the opening in accessory, Para. 60, locked and unlocked position), and an unlocked position (32) wherein the locking component is retracted out of the opening (Fig. Para. 60, locked and unlocked position where); and a magnet (314) coupled to the actuator such that the magnet moves with the movement of the actuator (Figs. 7-8, pivots with actuator), wherein: in the unlocked position the magnet is at least partially aligned with a second magnet of the accessory, and in the locked position the magnet is offset from the second magnet of the accessory (Para. 60, magnet key is inserted to unlock and removed/offset to lock). Re: Claim 22, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a bias element (312) operable to bias the actuator toward the locked position, wherein the magnet is configured resist the bias element to hold the actuator in the unlocked position when an accessory is positioned on the retention assembly (Para. 60, bias element bias toward locking until magnet holds resist said force in the unlocked position). Re: Claim 23, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a rotatable link (386) pivotably coupled to the locking component; and a transfer link (300) coupled between the rotatable link and the actuator (Depicted in Fig. 8). Re: Claim 24, Meyer discloses the claimed invention including a retention assembly, comprising: an actuator (398) mounted to a retention housing (306) (Fig. 7 & 8, Para. 54, actuator within housing); a locking component (333) coupled to the actuator, the actuator movable to move the locking component between a locked position (34) and an unlocked position (32), wherein the locking component is pivotably coupled to a rotatable link (386), and the rotatable link is rotatable relative to the retention housing (Depicted in Fig. 8, mounted for relative movement), wherein a transfer link (300) is coupled between the rotatable link and the actuator, and wherein the transfer link is pivotable relative to the rotatable link and the actuator (Fig. 7-8, para. 58, transfer link may pivot relative to the other components); a magnet (314) coupled to the actuator (Fig. 8); and a bias element (312) operable to bias the actuator toward the locked position, the magnet configured resist the bias element to hold the actuator in the unlocked position when an accessory is positioned on the retention assembly (Para. 60, bias element bias toward locking until magnet holds resist said force in the unlocked position). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. References cited on the PTO-892 are provided showing additional examples of retention assemblies with magnets. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES P. CHEYNEY whose telephone number is (571)272-9971. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Durand can be reached at 571-272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES P. CHEYNEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 18, 2025
Interview Requested
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed
May 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678819
APPLICATION DEVICE FOR PREFERABLY PARTIALLY BOOSTED APPLICATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662301
PEPPER SPRAY DISPENSING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES AND METHODS OF USE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662924
PROPPANT DISPENSING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653347
Condiment Dispensing Apparatus, System, And Methods Of Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648675
TECHNOLOGY CONFIGURED TO MONITOR CORRECT UTILISATION OF A DISPENSED SUBSTANCE, INCLUDING DISPENSING UNITS HAVING ENVIRONMENTAL SENSORS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.6%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 799 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month