Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/591,200

POWER TOOL INCLUDING SOLID-STATE PROTECTION CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Priority
Mar 02, 2023 — provisional 63/488,094
Examiner
LEE, SEUNG H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1064 granted / 1215 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1226
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1215 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 7-10, and 15-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Siragusa (US 2022/0320874, cited by the applicant). Re claim 1: Siragusa teaches a power tool (10) comprising a housing; a motor (28) supported by the housing; a battery pack interface such as B+ and B- terminals configured to receive a battery pack (20); a switch (226) configured to control current provided from the battery pack interface to the motor; and a solid-state protection circuit (300) including a shunt register (304) serving as a current measurement device configured to determine a level of current supplied to the switch, and output a first signal related to the level of current supplied to the switch, and a gate driver (310) electrically connected to the switch, the gate driver configured to receive a control signal to disable the switch in response to the first signal indicating that the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds a current threshold (see figs. 1-2; paragraphs 0020-0031). Re claim 2: Wherein the solid-state protection circuit (300) further includes a controller (308) configured to: receive the first signal from the current measurement device; determine, based on the first signal, whether the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds the current threshold (paragraph 0028); measure a duration of time that the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds the current threshold; determine whether the duration of time exceeds a time limit; and generate, in response to determining that the duration of time exceeds the time limit, the control signal to disable the switch (paragraphs 0010, 0013). Re claim 7: Wherein the current measurement device is configured to determine the level of current supplied to the switch by measuring a voltage drop across the switch (i.e., the shunt register is well-known to measure current). Re claim 8: Wherein the solid-state protection circuit (300) further includes the shunt resistor (304) having a sense resistor connected in series with the switch; and the current measurement device is configured to determine the level of current supplied to the switch by measuring a voltage drop across the sense resistor (paragraph 0027). Re claim 9: Siragusa teaches a method for controlling a power tool having a motor (28), a battery pack interface such as B+ and B- terminals and a switch (226) configured to control current provided from the battery pack interface to the motor, the method comprising determining, with a shunt register (304) serving as a current measurement device, a level of current supplied to the switch; outputting, with the current measurement device, a first signal related to the level of current supplied to the switch; and receiving, with a gate driver (310) electrically connected to the switch, a control signal to disable the switch in response to the first signal indicating that the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds a current threshold (see figs. 1-2; paragraphs 0020-0031). Re claim 10: The method further comprising receiving, with a controller (308), the first signal from the current measurement device; determining, with the controller based on the first signal, whether the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds the current threshold (paragraph 0028); measuring, with the controller, a duration of time that the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds the current threshold; determining, with the controller, whether the duration of time exceeds a time limit; and generating, with the controller in response to determining that the duration of time exceeds the time limit, the control signal to disable the switch (paragraphs 0010, 0013). Re claim 15: Wherein determining the level of current supplied to the switch includes measuring a voltage drop across the switch (i.e., the shunt register is well-known to measure current). Re claim 16: Wherein determining the level of current supplied to the switch includes measuring a voltage drop across the shunt resistor (304) serving as a sense resistor connected in series with the switch (paragraph 0027). Re claim 17: Siragusa teaches a power tool comprising a motor (28); a power input interface such as B+ and B- terminals electrically connectable to a power source; a switch (226) arranged on a current path between the power input interface and the motor; and a solid-state protection circuit (300) including a shunt register (304) serving as a current measurement device configured to determine a level of current on the current path, and output a first signal related to the level of current on the current path, and a gate driver (310) electrically connected to the switch, the gate driver configured to receive a control signal to disable the switch in response to the first signal indicating that the level of current on the current path exceeds a current threshold (see figs. 1-2; paragraphs 0020-0031). Re claim 18: Wherein the solid-state protection circuit further includes a controller (308) configured to: receive the first signal from the current measurement device; determine, based on the first signal, whether the level of current on the current path exceeds the current threshold (paragraph 0028); measure a duration of time that the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds the current threshold; determine whether the duration of time exceeds a time limit; and generate, in response to determining that the duration of time exceeds the time limit, the control signal to disable the switch (paragraphs 0010, 0013). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6, 11-14, and 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: None of prior art teaches the power tool comprising the controller, wherein the controller is further configured to determine whether the level of current supplied to the switch exceeds a particular one of a plurality of current thresholds; and determine the time limit based on the particular one of the plurality of current thresholds that the current supplied to the switch exceeds, wherein the solid-state protection circuit further includes: a resistive-capacitive circuit configured to receive the first signal related to the level of current supplied to the switch; and a comparator configured to: receive, from the resistive-capacitive circuit, a second signal related to a voltage output of the resistive-capacitive circuit, receive a third signal related to a voltage threshold, and generate the control signal in response to the second signal being greater than the third signal, the method further comprising receiving, with a resistive-capacitive circuit electrically connected to the current measurement device, the first signal related to the level of current supplied to the switch; receiving, with a comparator electrically connected to the resistive-capacitive circuit and the gate driver, a second signal related to a voltage output of the resistive-capacitive circuit; receiving, with the comparator, a third signal related to a voltage threshold; and generating, with the comparator, the control signal in response to the second signal being greater than the third signal as set forth in the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ichikawa et al. (US 2013/0082627) and Panetta et al. (US 2022/0001525) teach power tools having power controls. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEUNG H LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-2401. The examiner can normally be reached 7-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEUNG H LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749821
REDUCING AZIMUTH-ELEVATION CORRELATION IN AN ANTENNA ARRAY STRUCTURE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749831
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND BASE STATION ANTENNA FEEDER SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744344
ELECTRICAL PLUG CONNECTOR WITH RADIALLY ACTUATED SECONDARY LOCKING, AND ELECTRICAL PLUG-IN CONNECTION SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744306
BASE STATION ANTENNA
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738630
PAINTING ANTENNA AND ANTENNA-INTEGRATED ARTICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1215 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month