Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/592,075

NETWORK CONTROLLED REPEATER COMMUNICATIONS BASED ON USER EQUIPMENT MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Examiner
DOAN, PHUOC HUU
Art Unit
2646
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1029 granted / 1123 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1140
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1123 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claim(s) 1, 3, 7-8, 17, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by FU et al. (US Pub No. 2024/0040521). Claim 1, FU discloses a user equipment (UE) (See Fig. 3A), comprising: one or more memories (Fig. 3A; item 360) storing processor-executable code; and one or more processors coupled with the one or more memories (Fig. 3A; items 340, 360) and individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive a set of machine learning parameters associated with wireless communications between the UE and a network entity via one or more repeaters (par [0143] “the repeater uses beam b1 to forward the signal from the base station to the UE, and employs a first set of power control parameters which applied MACHINE Learning ML service support in par [0007]”); select a first subset of the set of machine learning parameters based at least in part on a first state of the one or more repeaters (par [0144] “set of power control parameters to adjust the power of the repeater. In some examples, the power control parameters determined for different beams may be same or different”); and communicate with the network entity (par [0144] “the repeater uses beam b4 to forward the signal from the UE to the base station”), via the one or more repeaters, using one or more communications parameters that are selected based at least in part on the first subset of the set of machine learning parameters (par [0144] “repeater uses beam b2 to forward the signal from the base station to the UE, and employs a second set of power control parameters to adjust the power of the repeater as further disclosed in par [0143]). Claim 3, 19, FU further discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the first subset of the set of machine learning parameters is selected based at least in part on a set of available repeater states of the one or more repeaters (par [0111] “forwarding the information by the repeater herein may refer to the repeater directly forwards the radio frequency without decoding the information, while receiving the information by the repeater may refer to the repeater decodes the received information”). Claim 7, FU further discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the first subset of the set of machine learning parameters is selected based at least in part on a source of one or more reference signals received at the UE (par [0108] “control signaling and information by reference signals”) Claim 8, FU further discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the first subset of the set of machine learning parameters is selected based at least in part on an antenna array configuration of at least a first repeater of the one or more repeaters (par [0063] “applied antenna arrays to support the repeater in par [0143]). Claim 17, the claim is rejected for the same reasons as set forth in claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-16 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 9, and their dependents thereof, are allowed because the closest prior art, either alone or in combination, fail to disclose of a user equipment (UE), comprising: one or more memories storing processor-executable code; and one or more processors coupled with the one or more memories and individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive a set of machine learning parameters associated with wireless communications between the UE and a network entity via one or more repeaters, the set of machine learning parameters including at least a first subset of machine learning parameters associated with a first configuration of the one or more repeaters and a second subset of machine learning parameters associated with a second configuration of the one or more repeaters; and transmit a request to update the one or more repeaters from the first configuration to the second configuration, the request based at least in part on a difference between a first communications parameter and a second communications parameter meeting one or more request criteria, wherein the first communications parameter is determined using the first subset of machine learning parameters and the second communications parameter is determined using the second subset of machine learning parameters. Claims 2, 4-6, 18, 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 4. The UE of claim 1, wherein the first state of the one or more repeaters is associated with a first repeater that is in an off state and a second repeater that is in an on state, and output from a machine learning algorithm associated with the first repeater is ignored when the one or more repeaters are in the first state. Claim 2. The UE of claim 1, wherein, to receive the set of machine learning parameters, the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive configuration information that indicates the set of machine learning parameters, a set of states associated with the one or more repeaters, and one or more selection criteria that associates different states of the set of states with different subsets of the set of machine learning parameters, and wherein the set of machine learning parameters include one or more of a set of machine learning algorithms, a set of parameters associated with one or more machine learning algorithms, or any combination thereof. Claim 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the receiving the set of machine learning parameters comprises: receiving configuration information that indicates the set of machine learning parameters, a set of states associated with the one or more repeaters, and one or more selection criteria that associates different states of the set of states with different subsets of the set of machine learning parameters, and wherein the set of machine learning parameters include one or more of a set of machine learning algorithms, a set of parameters associated with one or more machine learning algorithms, or any combination thereof. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. WANG (US Pub No 2025/0254598) discloses method, devices, and computer readable medium for communication. LEE et al. (US Pub No. 2023/0371123) discloses method and apparatus for transmission and reception of network-controlled repeater for wireless communication systems. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUOC HUU DOAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7920. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00AM - 4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MATTHEW ANDERSON can be reached at 571-272-4177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUOC H DOAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640856
INTER DU CARRIER AGGREGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634933
DISTRIBUTED TRANSMISSION ACROSS 80MHZ
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634059
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING BANDWIDTH PARTS AND TERMINAL
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12610334
CLOCK CALIBRATION METHOD, CLOCK CALIBRATION APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND READABLE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12609765
Out of Band Demand Assigned Multiple Access
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1123 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month