Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/592,449

ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTORECEPTOR, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Priority
Sep 27, 2023 — JP 2023-165025
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
47%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
26 granted / 36 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -25% lift
Without
With
+-25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP 2023-165025, filed on 9/27/2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Azuma (JP 2017-125878) in view of Hironaka (WO 2022-239656). Azuma teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member including a photosensitive layer, wherein the binder resin contains a polyarylate resin and a polycarbonate resin (Abstract). The photosensitive layer may be a multi-layer type, wherein the charge generation layer is the outermost layer ([0027]). The content ratio of the polyarylate resin to the polycarbonate resin is 7:3 to 1:9 ([0129]). Exemplary photoreceptors A-19 and A-20 have ratios of 50:50 and 70:30, respectively (Table 1). The polycarbonate resin has the repeating units (2-1) and (2-2), comparable to (PCB) and (PCA) of instant claim 5, respectively ([0099]). PNG media_image1.png 132 343 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 135 341 media_image2.png Greyscale The exemplary polycarbonate resins (PC-3), (PC-5), and (PC-6) contain the same components as the polycarbonate resin (PC1) of the instant application ([0110-114]). The proportion of the repeating unit (2-1) to the repeating unit (2-2) in these examples ranges from 40:60 to 90:10. PNG media_image3.png 113 565 media_image3.png Greyscale Hironaka teaches a polymer for use in a coating film containing at least one of a structural unit (I-A) and (I-B), and a structural unit (II) (Abstract). The coating film is useful for the charge transport layer in an electrophotographic photoreceptor, as it provides excellent abrasion resistance ([0098], line 11-17). PNG media_image4.png 118 508 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 125 510 media_image5.png Greyscale Formula (I-A) and (I-B) are representative of Formula (B) of instant claim 4. This structural unit gives the material both rigidity and flexibility to enhance the wear resistance of the coating film ([0020], line 4-5). Formula (II-2) is representative of Formula (A) of instant claim 4. The exemplary polymer (1) ([0102-104]) contains the same primary monomers as the polyester resin 2 of the instant application. This polymer showed the best results for each of the evaluations of abrasion resistance, film-forming properties, and heat resistance (Table 1). This resin would have the same elastic deformation rate as PE2 of the instant application of 53.8%. PNG media_image6.png 102 341 media_image6.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the photoreceptor of Azuma to have used the polymer of Hironaka as the polyarylate resin in order to improve the abrasion resistance. The elastic deformation rate of the polycarbonate resin of Azuma would have a similar rate as PC1 of the instant application, and as such the difference between the polyester resin and the polycarbonate resin would be approximately 5.8%. Claims 6-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Azuma and Hironaka as applied to claims 1-5 above, and further in view of Yasufumi (JP 2014-044317). Azuma and Hironaka are silent regarding an image forming apparatus for use with the photoreceptor. As such, a person of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to look to the prior art. Yasufumi teaches an electrophotographic image forming apparatus (Figure 1, printer). The printer includes an image forming units (process cartridges, Figure 2, 10), which are known to be attachable to and detachable from the printer. The image forming units include a photoreceptor (11), a charging device (12), a developer (13), and a transfer device (14) ([0027]). The printer further includes an exposure device (latent image forming device, 20 ([0022]). The charging device applies only a DC voltage to the photoreceptor ([0028]). The voltage applied to the charging member from the DC voltage application unit is -500V ([0028]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 07/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704795
FINE PARTICLE CONTAINING SILICON AND TONER
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12645164
TONER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
47%
With Interview (-25.0%)
3y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month