Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/592,566

TECHNIQUES TO PROVIDE NETWORK-RELATED SERVICES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 01, 2024
Examiner
DEAN, RAYMOND S
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Deutsche Telekom AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
618 granted / 883 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
931
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4 – 7, 10, 12, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hu et al. (US 11,265,226). Regarding Claim 1, Hu teaches a method for providing and/or using services, the services being provided at least indirectly by a network operator, the method comprising: providing a communication link between a network of the network operator and a user equipment (UE) (Figure 2, gateway, which comprises gateway control planes and gateway user planes enables a communication link between the UE network operator, which is the internet service provider (ISP)); transmitting a first communication address of a service controller of the network operator to the UE (Col. 13 lines 38 – 42, communication address of gateway), wherein the service controller manages an access to services that can be used by the UE (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, gateway provides the network slice information, which the services are based on, thus the gateway effectively manages access to the services); sending, by the UE, a request to access a particular service of the service controller to the first communication address of the service controller (Col. 15 lines 1 – 12, session connection create request); transmitting a message comprising a second communication address of the service from the service controller to the UE (Cols. 17 lines 26 – 33, 18 lines 44 – 60, service policy info comprises network slice connection policy, performs a service based on network slice, access type is the address of the service); and sending, by the UE, a request to start the service to the second communication address of the service (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, establishing and initiating the connection for the service). Regarding Claim 12, Hu teaches a service controller for managing and/or providing services, wherein the service controller comprises: a first communication interface to a network layer of a network operator (Figure 2, gateway will communicate with internet network and thus the ISP in order to provide services to the UE via the access network thus there will be an interface to communicate with the ISP); a second communication interface to a service layer of the network operator (Figure 2, gateway will communicate with internet network and thus the ISP in order to provide services to the UE via the access network thus there will be an interface to communicate with the ISP); and a third communication interface to a user equipment (UE) (Figure 2, gateway communicates with the UE via the access network); wherein the service controller is configured to: provide a communication link between a network of the network operator and the UE (Figure 2, gateway, which comprises gateway control planes and gateway user planes enables a communication link between the UE network operator, which is the internet service provider (ISP)); transmit a first communication address of the service controller to the UE (Cols. 17 lines 26 – 33, 18 lines 44 – 60, service policy info comprises network slice connection policy, performs a service based on network slice, access type is the address of the service); manages an access to services that can be used by the UE (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, gateway provides the network slice information, which the services are based on, thus the gateway effectively manages access to the services); receive, via the first communication address of the service controller, a request to access a particular service of the service controller (Col. 15 lines 1 – 12, session connection create request). Regarding Claim 14, Hu teaches a communication system, comprising: a service controller of a network operator (Figure 2, gateway, which comprises gateway control planes and gateway user planes); and a user equipment (UE) (Figure 2); wherein the service controller is configured to: provide a communication link between a network of the network operator and the UE (Figure 2, gateway, which comprises gateway control planes and gateway user planes enables a communication link between the UE network operator, which is the internet service provider (ISP)); transmit a first communication address of a service controller of the network operator to the UE (Col. 13 lines 38 – 42, communication address of gateway); and manage an access to services that can be used by the UE (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, gateway provides the network slice information, which the services are based on, thus the gateway effectively manages access to the services); wherein the UE is configured to send a request to access a particular service of the service controller to the first communication address of the service controller (Col. 15 lines 1 – 12, session connection create request); wherein the service controller is further configured to transmit a message comprising a second communication address of the service from the service controller to the UE (Cols. 17 lines 26 – 33, 18 lines 44 – 60, service policy info comprises network slice connection policy, performs a service based on network slice, access type is the address of the service); and wherein the UE is further configured to send a request to start the service to the second communication address of the service (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, establishing and initiating the connection for the service). Regarding Claim 2, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu further teaches wherein the first communication address of the service controller is transmitted upon a request by the UE and/or by a network controller upon the UE registering to the network (Col. 13 line 13, UE sends an attach request message). Regarding Claim 4, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu further teaches wherein the service controller transmits to the UE a list of possible available services of different types, wherein the UE selects the service from the list (Col. 18 lines 55 – 57, searching network slices thus there will be a list of slices). Regarding Claim 5, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu further teaches wherein the message comprises parameters characterizing the service (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, network slice information characterizes the service). Regarding Claim 6, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 5. Hu further teaches wherein the message comprises a list with respective second communication addresses of several different implementations of a respective service (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, access types are the addresses, plurality of network slices thus there will be a list), wherein: the UE selects one of the implementations based on the parameters and/or the service controller performs a pre-selection of the implementations based on a second criteria (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, selection based on the desired service). Regarding Claim 7, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu further teaches wherein a service provider registers the service, wherein the service is known to the service controller, and wherein the service controller keeps the service available for requests (Figure 2, Cols. 17 lines 26 – 33, 18 lines 44 – 60, typical ISPs register the services they offer, gateway provides network slice information, which is service information thus gateway keeps slices available). Regarding Claim 10, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu further teaches wherein the service is set up in the network of the network operator or in a further network of a further network operator (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, the service will be set up in the network of the ISP (Figure 2)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hu et al. (US 11,265,226) in view of Yoshizawa (US 2016/0044544). Regarding Claim 3, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 2. Hu does not teach wherein the network controller selects, from among a plurality of service controllers, the service controller whose first communication address it transmits to the UE according to a first criterion. Yoshizawa, which also teaches the use of gateways, teaches wherein the network controller selects, from among a plurality of service controllers, the service controller whose first communication address it transmits to the UE according to a first criterion (Sections 0017, 0018, appropriate gateway is selected to accommodate handoff based on a handoff request). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Hu with the above features of Yoshizawa for the purpose of preserving calls when changing networks as taught by Yoshizawa. Claim(s) 8, 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hu et al. (US 11,265,226) in view of Agarwal et al. (US 2017/0171818) Regarding Claim 8, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu does not teach wherein in case that the service is not available yet, the service controller sets up the service. Agarwal, which also teaches wireless communications, teaches wherein in case that the service is not available yet, the service controller sets up the service (Section 0090, in DRX the mobile can be sleep during inactive periods while remaining connected to the network, the connection has been established or set up). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Hu with the above features of Agarwal for the purpose of providing an efficient use of power as taught by Agarwal. Regarding Claim 9, Hu combination teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 8. Hu does not teach wherein the service controller for setting up the service obtains execution-relevant information from a provider of the service and/or an internal service database of the network operator. Agarwal, which also teaches wireless communications, teaches wherein the service controller for setting up the service obtains execution-relevant information from a provider of the service and/or an internal service database of the network operator (Section 0090, device can wake up and monitor for activity which comprises execution relevant information). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Hu with the above features of Agarwal for the purpose of providing an efficient use of power as taught by Agarwal. Claim(s) 11, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hu et al. (US 11,265,226) in view of Govindassamy (US 10,531,361) Regarding Claim 11, Hu teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Hu does not teach wherein the service is set up in a distributed manner in the network of the network operator and in a further network of a further network operator. Govindassamy, which also teaches use of internet services, teaches wherein the service is set up in a distributed manner in the network of the network operator and in a further network of a further network operator (Col. 4 lines 18 – 36, distribution of internet services across access networks). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Hu with the above features of Govindassamy for the purpose of enabling a client device to get internet service from multiple sources as taught by Govindassamy. Regarding Claim 13, Hu combination teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 12. Hu further teaches a service handling engine; a service database; a service monitoring engine; a life cycle management engine; and/or a trust relation management engine (Col. 18 lines 44 – 60, gateway provides the network slice information, which the services are based on thus the entity of said gateway that handles the network slice information is the service handling engine). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND S DEAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7877. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 6:00-2:30, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached at 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND S DEAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645 Raymond S. Dean January 31, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603701
Distributed Satellite Constellation Management and Control System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587977
Physical Channel Processing Capability for Multiple Transmission Reception Points
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581419
Parameter resetting method and device, and parameter information receiving method and device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581427
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF POWER STATE AWARE DYNAMIC SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574856
UPLINK POWER CONTROL FOR DATA AND CONTROL CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+15.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month