Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/593,027

SHEET CONVEYANCE DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 01, 2024
Examiner
MCCULLOUGH, MICHAEL C
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions INC.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
607 granted / 789 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saito (US 2023/0047690 A1) in view of Oki (US 9,981,487 B2). Regarding claim 1, Saito discloses a sheet conveyance device comprising: a reversing conveyance portion (170) into and out of which a sheet from a sheet reversing portion (180) in the horizontal direction travels to be switched back so that a conveyance direction of the sheet is switched (Figure 1); and Saito does not disclose specifically disclose the reversing conveyance portion includes a conveyance guide member provided in the reversing conveyance portion, the conveyance guide member having a sheet conveyance face facing a bottom face of the sheet passing through the reversing conveyance portion, wherein the sheet conveyance face has one or more curved portions curved in the up-down direction as viewed from a width direction orthogonal to the conveyance direction of the sheet so as to form projections and depressions in the up-down direction, the sheet conveyance face curving the sheet in the up-down direction along the curved portion. However, Oki discloses a similar device that includes a conveyance guide member (61), the conveyance guide member having a sheet conveyance face (top surface of 61) facing a bottom face of the sheet passing through, wherein the sheet conveyance face has one or more curved portions (80, 80a) curved in the up-down direction (Figures 5 and 6) as viewed from a width direction orthogonal to the conveyance direction of the sheet so as to form projections (80) and depressions (80a) in the up-down direction (Figures 5 and 6), the sheet conveyance face curving the sheet in the up-down direction (Figure 6 clearly shows a downward component for the sheet conveyance direction, column 9 lines 53-59, and the curving of the sheet would be based on the rigidity of the sheet being conveyed which would fall under MPEP 2115) along the curved portion (Figure 6) for the purpose of reducing contact area between the sheet and the conveyance surface to reduce static electricity and friction (column 9 lines 12-24). It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of the applicant’s filing to modify Saito by utilizing a conveyance guide member provided in the reversing conveyance portion, the conveyance guide member having a sheet conveyance face facing a bottom face of the sheet passing through the reversing conveyance portion, wherein the sheet conveyance face has one or more curved portions curved in the up-down direction as viewed from a width direction orthogonal to the conveyance direction of the sheet so as to form projections and depressions in the up-down direction, the sheet conveyance face curving the sheet in the up-down direction along the curved portion, as disclosed by Oki, for the purpose of reducing contact area between the sheet and the conveyance surface to reduce static electricity and friction. Regarding claim 2, Saito discloses a relay conveyance portion (152) arranged below the conveyance guide member in parallel therewith and extending from upstream to downstream of the reversing conveyance portion with respect to an entering direction of the sheet into the reversing conveyance portion (Figure 1), the relay conveyance portion conveying downstream the sheet discharged from a sheet discharging portion (150 or 151). Regarding claim 3, the combination discloses the conveyance guide member (Oki) has an inclined portion (along the path in Figure 1 of Saito) at a downstream end with respect to the entering direction of the sheet into the reversing conveyance portion, the inclined portion being inclined upward or downward (the top end of path 170 is inclined up). Regarding claim 4, the combination discloses the conveyance guide member (Oki) extends downstream of the sheet reversing portion in the conveyance direction of the sheet (along the path in Figure 1 of Saito), and a length of the conveyance guide member in a horizontal direction is smaller than a length of the longest sheet conveyed to the reversing conveyance portion in the conveyance direction (the material worked upon does not limit an apparatus claim, see MPEP 2115). Regarding claim 5, the combination discloses a sheet reversing portion (Saito, 170); a sheet discharge portion (Saito, 151); and the sheet conveyance device according to claim 1 (see above). Regarding claim 6, Saito discloses an image reading portion (191) that is arranged above the reversing conveyance portion (Figure 1) and that reads an image on a document. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/25/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Oki discloses the side face 80a serves as a scooping face to scoop up the edge of the roll paper 1 so that the roll paper 1 is transported (conveyed) smoothly without getting caught and that is not conveyed while being curved along the side face 80a. The examiner agrees that Oki discloses 80a scoops the edge of the roll paper 1 so that it is conveyed smoothly but as clearly seen in Figure 6 and column 9 lines 53-59 of Oki, the sheet bends into the recess at 80a (arrow on right side that is directed to the left and downward) and is guided back upward to 80 (arrow on the left side that is directed to the right and upward). The sheet is disclosed as curving into the recess of 80a and then directed back to 80. Oki teaches the amended limitations. PNG media_image1.png 637 538 media_image1.png Greyscale Applicant argues that claim 4 is for the configuration of a device for conveying a sheet and not for processing a sheet and therefore does not fall under MPEP 2115. In response, claim 4 attempts to define the length of the conveyance guide member relative to “a length of the longest sheet conveyed to the reversing conveyance portion”. The material worked upon, the longest sheet, does not limit an apparatus claim and therefore does not limit the length of the conveyance guide member. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL MCCULLOUGH whose telephone number is (571)272-7805. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL MCCULLOUGH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 25, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595142
SHEET FEEDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12559316
ADVANCED WAREHOUSE AND LOGISTIC SYSTEMS USING AUTONOMOUS MOBILE LIFT ROBOTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12545545
SHEET STACKER AND PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12519004
WAFER ALIGNER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12486129
SHEET FEEDING DEVICE THAT SEQUENTIALLY DRAWS OUT AND FEEDS SHEETS FROM SHEET TRAY, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month