Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/593,189

CROSS-TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION IN NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICES

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Mar 01, 2024
Examiner
CHAUDRY, MUJTABA M
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Micron Technology, INC.
OA Round
3 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
694 granted / 824 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
849
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Applicants’ response filed 7/25/2025 has been considered. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Prior rejections under 35 USC 112 are withdrawn in view of amendments. Prior double patenting rejection is withdrawn in view of terminal disclaimer. Prior art rejections are maintained in view of remarks made here. See prior office action(s) for details. Claims 6-7, 13-14 and 19-20 remain objected to as allowable subject matter IDS has been considered. PTO-1449 is attached. Application is pending. Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments filed 7/25/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. For example, claim 1 recites: A system comprising: a non-volatile memory device; and a processing device, operatively coupled to the non-volatile memory device, to perform operations comprising: receiving, from a host system, a write command comprising host data; determining an operating temperature value of the non-volatile memory device; preparing write data comprising the host data and the operating temperature value; and programming, to the non-volatile memory device, the write data. The claim essentially states to write host data to the memory with specified temperature. There isn’t anything substantial in the independent claim(s). Applicants contend, the prior art (Guy) does not teach or suggest, “…preparing write data comprising host data and the operating temperature…programming, to the non-volatile memory device, the write data.” The Examiner respectfully disagrees. PNG media_image1.png 601 480 media_image1.png Greyscale The prior art (Guy) teaches (i.e., Figure 1, above and paragraph 0026) the temperature indicator 112 determines the write temperature of the memory devices 110-1—110-N. Specifically Guy teaches: The system 100 can include a temperature indicator 112. The temperature indicator 112 may be utilized to determine a temperature of a memory devices 110-1, . . . , 110-N at a particular time. For example, the temperature indicator 112 can determine a write temperature of a memory device, e.g., memory device 110-1, when a memory cell of the memory device is programmed, e.g., written. The temperature indicator 112 can determine a read temperature of a memory device, e.g., memory device 110-1, when a memory cell of the memory device is read. A number of embodiments of the present disclosure provide that determined write temperatures can be communicated to the controller 108 and/or a memory device, e.g., memory device 111. For instance, the controller 108 can access the temperature indicator 112. Furthermore, Guy teaches (i.e., Figure 2 and paragraph 0027) the data structure to include write temperature data. Therefore the prior art teaches preparing write data comprising host data and the operating temperature…programming, to the non-volatile memory device, the write data. It is the Examiner’s conclusion that the claims of the present application, as presented, are not patentably distinct over the prior arts. Prior art rejections are maintained. See prior office action(s). Applicants are encouraged to formulate claim language that clearly defines the novelty of the application. Conclusion The following are suggested formats for either a Certificate of Mailing or Certificate of Transmission under 37 CFR 1.8(a). The certification may be included with all correspondence concerning this application or proceeding to establish a date of mailing or transmission under 37 CFR 1.8(a). Proper use of this procedure will result in such communication being considered as timely if the established date is within the required period for reply. The Certificate should be signed by the individual actually depositing or transmitting the correspondence or by an individual who, upon information and belief, expects the correspondence to be mailed or transmitted in the normal course of business by another no later than the date indicated. Certificate of Mailing I hereby certify that this correspondence is being deposited with the United States Postal Service with sufficient postage as first class mail in an envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on __________. (Date) Typed or printed name of person signing this certificate: ________________________________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________ Certificate of Transmission by Facsimile I hereby certify that this correspondence is being facsimile transmitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Fax No. (___)_____ -_________ on _____________. (Date) Typed or printed name of person signing this certificate: _________________________________________ Signature: ________________________________________ Certificate of Transmission via USPTO Patent Electronic Filing System I hereby certify that this correspondence is being transmitted via the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent electronic filing system to the USPTO on _____________. (Date) Typed or printed name of person signing this certificate: _________________________________________ Signature: ________________________________________ Please refer to 37 CFR 1.6(a)(4), 1.6(d) and 1.8(a)(2) for filing limitations concerning transmissions via the USPTO patent electronic filing system, facsimile transmissions and mailing, respectively. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUJTABA M CHAUDRY whose telephone number is (571)272-3817. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Albert DeCady can be reached at 571-272-3819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MUJTABA M. CHAUDRY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2112 /MUJTABA M CHAUDRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jan 22, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 23, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 24, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jul 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 23, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603802
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFICATION VIA CHANNELS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596946
QUANTUM METADATA LINEAGE TRACING USING QUANTUM MULTIPART ENTANGLED TWIN TECHNOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587213
METHOD AND SYSTEM OF ERROR INJECTION FOR LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587315
METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE ERROR AVOIDANCE TO INCREASE RE-TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY IN TIME-SLOTTED COMMUNICATION LINKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585974
QUANTUM CIRCUITS FOR MOVING A SURFACE CODE PATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month