Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/593,343

INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Mar 01, 2024
Priority
Jul 21, 2023 — JP 2023-119424
Examiner
TRAN, VU V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
365 granted / 406 resolved
+29.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
413
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 406 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to application 18/5933343 filed on March 01, 2024. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claims 1-8 are pending and herein considered. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No JP2023-119424, filed on 07/21/23]. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 USC § 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter. Regarding claim 1; claim 1 calls for asystem; however, the body of the claim does not positively recite any hardware element. As recited in the body of the claim, the claimed device contains “a interface” and “a processor”. The interface can be construed by a software component. Regarding the claim a processor, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that a “processor” could be a software processor (See “The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms,” Seventh Edition, published in 2000). Because the elements of claim 1 are interpreted as merely software and the claim lacks any physical device or machine, the claim is directed to non-statutory subject matter. It is suggested that the claim be further amended to positively recite at least one hardware element within the body of the claim to make the claim statutory under 35 U.S.C. 101. Regarding claims 2-12; claims 2-12 do not recite any hardware element to resolve the issue in the independent claim 1. Therefore, claims 2-12 are also non-statutory under 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2)as being anticipated by Amaizumi et, al. Regarding claim 1, Amaizumi discloses an information processing system comprising: a processor configured to: recognize a new device administrator as a device administrator in a case where first authentication information and second authentication information for the device administrator are received par. [0020] following validation, a first device token is created on the server and transmitted to the device. such tokens may be visible to both the server and the device. the device may receive the first device token and prompt the user to enter a secondary credential on the device. reset or overwrite the second authentication information in a case where an instruction to reset or overwrite the second authentication information is given by a user belonging to a predetermined authority group permitted to reset or overwrite the second authentication information for the device administrator [0042] the MFP 10 comprises: a manual control part 11 including a plurality of keys 11a, and accepting various instructions given by a user manipulating the keys 11a and the input of data including characters, numerals and the like; a display 12 for displaying an instruction menu for the user, information about acquired images, and the like; a scanner part 13 for photoelectrically reading an original to provide image data; and a printer part 14 for printing an image on a recording sheet based on the image data.; and perform processing of initializing the first authentication information for the device administrator in a case where the second authentication information is reset or overwritten par. [0024] added to a configuration according to another example embodiment. In addition, addition, deletion, or replacement is possible between part of a configuration according to one example embodiment and another configuration. Regarding claim 8 A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program causing a computer to execute a process for information processing, the process comprising: recognizing a new device administrator as a device administrator, in a case where first authentication information and second authentication information for the device administrator are received [0020] following validation, a first device token is created on the server and transmitted to the device. such tokens may be visible to both the server and the device. the device may receive the first device token and prompt the user to enter a secondary credential on the device. resetting or overwriting the second authentication information in a case where an instruction to reset or overwrite the second authentication information is given by a user belonging to a predetermined authority group permitted to reset or overwrite the second authentication information for the device administrator; and performing processing of initializing the first authentication information for the device administrator in a case where the second authentication information is reset or overwritten [0024] added to a configuration according to another example embodiment. In addition, addition, deletion, or replacement is possible between part of a configuration according to one example embodiment and another configuration.. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 2-7would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 101, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU V TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1708. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 AM- 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Korzuch can be reached at 571-272-7589. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU V TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2491
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12719657
ENCRYPTION PROCESSING DEVICE AND ENCRYPTION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706734
Automorphic Transformations of Signal Samples within a Transmitter or Receiver
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706882
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR CLOUD-BASED VIRTUAL PRIVATE SECURED CONTAINED COMMUNICATION PORTAL
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12671581
COMPUTATION ON LWE-ENCRYPTED VALUES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659131
LIFECYCLE ADMINISTRATION OF DOMAIN NAME BLOCKCHAIN ADDRESSES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 406 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month