Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/593,583

BIOMIMETIC TURTLE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 01, 2024
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — TW 113101715
Examiner
PAULSON, SHEETAL R.
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Pioneer Material Precision Tech Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
55%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allowance Rate
261 granted / 666 resolved
-12.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§103
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 666 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Prosecution History Summary Claims 12-13 are new. Claims 1-13 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 8-11, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 114802667. As per claim 1, CN ‘667 teaches a biomimetic turtle, comprising: -a waterproof housing unit (CN ‘667: pg. 12; abstract; Underwater robot with main body structure) that includes -a waterproof casing defining a waterproof space therein (CN ‘667: figure 1, 200; pg. 8-9; body structure), and having -two front limb connecting holes that are in fluid communication with said waterproof space (CN ‘667: figure 1, 100; pg. 8-9; forelimb structure arranged on both sides of main body), and -two hind limb connecting holes that are in fluid communication with said waterproof space (CN ‘667: figure 1, 300; pg. 11; hind limb structure arranged at two sides of the main body structure.), PNG media_image1.png 811 1000 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1 (CN’667) -two front limb connectors connected respectively to said front limb connecting holes (CN ‘667: figure 5, 106; pg. 8; Front limb structure including a connecting frame), and -two hind limb connectors connected respectively to said hind limb connecting holes (CN ‘667: figure 21, 304; pg. 12); PNG media_image2.png 674 1000 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure 5 (CN’667) -two front limb driving motors (401) that are disposed in said waterproof space, each of said front limb driving motors including a front limb driving shaft that is connected to a respective one of said front limb connectors (CN ‘667: figure 5, 1083; linkage shaft); -two hind limb driving motors (501) that are disposed in said waterproof space, each of said hind limb driving motors including a hind limb driving shaft that is connected to a respective one of said hind limb connectors (CN ‘667: figure 21, 3031, 3032; pg. 12); -two front limb modules that are connected respectively and detachably to said front limb connectors, and that are driven respectively by said front limb driving motors via said front limb connectors (CN ‘667: figures 1 and 5); -two hind limb modules that are connected respectively and detachably to said hind limb connectors, and that are driven respectively by said hind limb driving motors via said hind limb connectors (CN ‘667: figure 23, 501); and PNG media_image3.png 543 1000 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 544 1000 media_image4.png Greyscale Figure 21 (CN’667) Figure 23 (CN’667) -a control unit that is mounted in said waterproof space of said waterproof casing, and that is configured to control said front limb driving motors and said hind limb driving motors (CN ‘667: pg. 5; Driving part connected to the control part used to control the coordinates of underwater exploration robot.). As per claim 2, the turtle of claim 1 is as described. CN ‘667 further teaches wherein: -each of said front limb driving motors further includes a front motor body (CN ‘667: figure 5); -each of said hind limb driving motors further includes a rear motor body (CN ‘667: figure 21); -said waterproof space has -two front motor accommodating chambers accommodating respectively said front motor bodies of said front limb driving motors (CN ‘667: figure 2), and -two rear motor accommodating chambers accommodating respectively said rear motor bodies of said hind limb driving motors (CN ‘667: figure 2); and PNG media_image5.png 531 1000 media_image5.png Greyscale Figure 2 -said waterproof casing includes -a main casing portion (CN ‘667: figure 2, 200), -two front limb motor casing portions formed respectively with said front limb connecting holes, and cooperating with said main casing portion to define said front motor accommodating chambers (CN ‘667: figure 2), and -two hind limb motor casing portions formed respectively with said hind limb connecting holes, and cooperating with said main casing portion to define said rear motor accommodating chambers (CN ‘667: figure 2). As per claim 8, the turtle of claim 1 is as described. CN ‘667 further teaches wherein: -each of said front limb connectors is rotatable about a first front rotating axis extending in a front-rear direction (CN ‘667: pg. 8); and -each of said front limb modules includes an L-shaped link rod having a first segment that is mounted to a front portion of the respective one of said front limb connectors and that extends away from said first segment of said L-shaped link rod of another one of said front limb modules (CN ‘667: figure 5; pg. 8), and -a second segment that extends forwardly from a distal end of said first segment in the front-rear direction (CN ‘667: figure 2), and -a front limb mounted to and covering a front portion of said second segment, extending away from said front limb of said another one of said front limb modules (CN ‘667: figure 2), and -rotatable about a second front rotating axis that is perpendicular to the first front rotating axis (CN ‘667: figure 2). PNG media_image6.png 456 864 media_image6.png Greyscale Figure 2 (CN ‘667) As per claim 9, the turtle of claim 8 is as described. CN ‘667 further teaches wherein: -each of said front limb modules further includes an angle limiting mechanism mounted between said L-shaped link rod and said front limb for limiting a rotation angle of said front limb relative to said second segment of said L-shaped link rod (CN ‘667: pg. 8-10; figure 5); and -said angle limiting mechanism has -an arcuate sliding groove formed in one of said L-shaped link rod and said front limb (CN ‘667: pg. 8-10; figure 5), and -a sliding protrusion slidably engaging said arcuate sliding groove and formed on another one of said L-shaped link rod and said front limb (CN ‘667: pg. 8-10; figure 5). PNG media_image7.png 447 668 media_image7.png Greyscale Figure 5 (CN ‘667) As per claim 10, the turtle of claim 8 is as described. CN ‘667 further teaches wherein -said front limb of each of said front limb modules includes -a front limb frame mounted to the front portion of said second segment of said L-shaped link rod (CN ‘667: pg. 8-10; figure 5), and -a deformable front flipper portion surrounding and covering said front limb frame (CN ‘667: pg. 8-10; figure 5), and -extending rearwardly away from said deformable front flipper portion of another one of said front limb modules (CN ‘667: pg. 8-10; figure 5). As per claim 11, the turtle of claim 1 is as described. CN ‘667 further teaches wherein: -each of said hind limb connectors is rotatable about a rear rotating axis extending in a transverse direction (CN ‘667: figure 21-22); and -each of said hind limb modules includes -a hind limb link rod extending in a direction parallel to the transverse direction, and mounted to a rear portion of the respective one of said hind limb connectors (CN ‘667: figure 21-22), and -a deformable hind flipper mounted to and covering a rear portion of said hind limb link rod and extending rearwardly in the front-rear direction (CN ‘667: figure 22). PNG media_image8.png 345 644 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 428 723 media_image9.png Greyscale Figure 21 (CN ‘667) Figure 22 (CN ‘667) As per claim 13, the turtle of claim 1 is as described. CN ‘667 further teaches wherein said front limb driving motors and said hind limb driving motors are motors without a waterproof function (CN ‘667: pg. 12; In addition but not required to include waterproof motors.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 114802667 in view of CN 114590376. As per claim 3, the turtle of claim 1 is as described. CN ‘667 does not explicitly teach the following, however, CN ‘376 teaches wherein: -said biomimetic turtle further comprises: -a weight module disposed in said waterproof space and including a weight member (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 5, 504) that is slidable relative to said waterproof casing along a longitudinal axis extending in a front-rear direction (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1, 5; a front and back gravity center adjusting mechanism), -a weight member driving motor that is mounted to said waterproof casing (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 5, 506), and -a crank connecting mechanism that is connected between said weight member and said weight member driving motor (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 5, 505); and -said control unit is configured to control said weight member driving motor to drive movement of said weight member via said crank connecting mechanism (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1, 4 and 6). PNG media_image10.png 476 638 media_image10.png Greyscale Figure 1 (CN ‘376) PNG media_image11.png 338 888 media_image11.png Greyscale Figure 5 (CN ‘376) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was filed to modify the biomimetic turtle as taught by CN ‘667 by adding a weight module through out the turtle taught by CN ‘376 to allow control of movement of the turtle. As per claim 4, the turtle of claim 3 is as described. CN ‘667 does not explicitly teach the following, however, CN ‘376 teaches wherein said weight member is a battery unit (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 5, 504). The motivation to combine the teachings is same as claim 3. As per claim 5, the turtle of claim 3 is as described. CN ‘667 does not explicitly teach the following, however, CN ‘376 teaches wherein said weight member driving motor includes a weight driving shaft rotatable about an upright axis perpendicular to the front-rear direction, and connected co-movably to said crank connecting mechanism for driving the movement of said weight member (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 5). The motivation to combine the teachings is same as claim 3. As per claim 6, the turtle of claim 3 is as described. CN ‘667 does not explicitly teach the following, however, CN ‘376 teaches wherein: -said waterproof casing further has a head connecting hole in fluid communication with said waterproof space (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1); -said biomimetic turtle further comprises a head module extending through said head connecting hole and connected to said weight member (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1, 5 all the way to 6 (head)); and -said waterproof housing unit further includes a waterproof cover mounted between said head module and said waterproof casing (CN ‘376: pg. 4; underwater bionic turtle shell). The motivation to combine the teachings is same as claim 3. As per claim 7, the turtle of claim 6 is as described. CN ‘667 does not explicitly teach the following, however, CN ‘376 teaches wherein: -said head module includes -a connecting rod extending through said head connecting hole and connected to said weight member (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1), -a head casing opening rearwardly in the front-rear direction (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1), and -a dual shaft motor connected between said connecting rod and said head casing (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1), and driving said head casing to rotate relative to said connecting rod (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1); and -said waterproof cover cooperates with said head casing to define a head space for accommodating said dual shaft motor therein (CN ‘376: pg. 4; figure 1). The motivation to combine the teachings is same as claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 12 is allowable over prior arts and would be if not dependent from a rejected claim. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed for claims 1-2 and 8-11 under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. PNG media_image12.png 820 583 media_image12.png Greyscale Applicant argues that Li fails to teach at least the front limb driving motors and hind limb driving motors being disposed in the waterproof space and drive detachable front and hind limb modules through corresponding front and hind limb connectors, as required by claim 1. Examiner disagrees. Li teaches forelimb driving motor as 401 and hindlimb driving motor 501 being inside the waterproof sealed cabin. If you look at figures 1 and 2, it is shown the motors not sticking out, but placed inside the waterproof shell; the battery and control system are further inside the sealed cabin (200). In response to applicant’s argument that there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation to combine the references, the examiner recognizes that obviousness may be established by combining or modifying the teachings of the prior art to produce the claimed invention where there is some teaching, suggestion, or motivation to do so found either in the references themselves or in the knowledge generally available to one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 5 USPQ2d 1596 (Fed. Cir. 1988), In re Jones, 958 F.2d 347, 21 USPQ2d 1941 (Fed. Cir. 1992), and KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). In this case, Han was added to teach the weight-module features, which provides better propulsion by utilizing adjustment of the net buoyancy and the energy consumption is low (Han: background). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN 114056520 – Teaches a bionic marine exploration turtle with a turtle body. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEETAL R. PAULSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1368. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marc Jimenez can be reached at (571) 272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEETAL R PAULSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700488
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR SOUND DETECTION FROM MEDICAMENT OR TEST DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694963
METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF EMBODIMENT TRAINING IN A VIRTUAL-REALITY ENVIRONMENT
7y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688914
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IMPLEMENTING PERSONALIZED HEALTH APPLICATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676222
Tracking Use of Medical Device
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671001
TELEHEALTH SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEM
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
55%
With Interview (+16.2%)
4y 4m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 666 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month