Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/594,107

STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PRINTER DRIVER, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 04, 2024
Priority
Mar 07, 2023 — JP 2023-034760
Examiner
MENBERU, BENIYAM
Art Unit
2681
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
545 granted / 734 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§103
61.8%
+21.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 734 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4, 10, 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa. Regarding claim 1, Nakamoto discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions, that when executed, cause execution of a control method for an information processing apparatus that includes a display (paragraph 21, 23, 24; program stored in RAM/ROM that is executed by CPU cause method for control for client 101 (information processing apparatus) that include display 206), the control method comprising: displaying, on the display, a print setting screen for receiving a print setting for printing by a printer (paragraph 38; remote UI for print job operation and settings; paragraph 39-40; Fig. 7 displays print setting screen 701 include for receiving setting for “MAIN UNIT”, “LAN SETTING” of the printer) the displayed print setting screen including (i) a plurality of selectable objects (paragraph 39-40; Fig. 7 displays plurality of selectable links (objects) such as links for “MAIN UNIT SETTINGS”, “LAN SETTINGS”); (ii) an additional selectable object configured such that, when selected, information related to a fixed price print service for the printer is displayed (paragraph 40-43; selection item 702 (additional selectable object) if selected by user clicking on link, flat-rate printing service registration page (information related to a fixed price print service) is displayed for registering for flat-rate (fixed price print service) service). Nakamoto disclose the plurality of selectable objects being configured as stated above. However Nakamoto does not disclose such that, when selectable object is selected, selectable settings to be implemented by the printer when the printer performs printing are displayed and receiving one or more selectable settings to be implemented by the printer, when the printer performs printing, via the displayed print setting screen; and causing the printer to perform the printing according to the one or more selectable settings received via the displayed print setting screen. Nakagawa discloses such that, when selectable object is selected, selectable settings to be implemented by the printer when the printer performs printing are displayed (paragraph 16-17, 27-31; when link 406 (selectable object) is selected on initial print setting screen, it switches to display of Fig. 5 which display print settings screen 500 having selectable settings for performing printing such as paper size 505, orientation 506, collation 507, stapling 510 implemented by printer 2500; paragraph 26; ) and receiving one or more selectable settings to be implemented by the printer, when the printer performs printing, via the displayed print setting screen (paragraph 31-32; selection of stapling 510 on display print settings screen 500); and causing the printer to perform the printing according to the one or more selectable settings received via the displayed print setting screen (paragraph 28; when print button 408 is selected the printer prints based on selected settings on display print settings screen 500). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Nakagawa to provide print setting screen to provide selectable settings. The motivation to combine the references is to provide link which when selected provides detailed print specific setting items such as stapling, collation and sheet size selection to help user select specific settings for printing a print job (paragraph 16-17, 27-31). Regarding claim 4, Nakamoto discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the control method further comprises causing the information processing apparatus to obtain information related to the fixed price print service from a server that manages the fixed price print service (paragraph 20, 41-42; client device obtains the “Web page data for the flat-rate printing service registration page”( information relating to the fixed price print service) from the service provision apparatus 107 (server) that is managing this page; paragraph 35; service provision apparatus 107 manages users of the flat-rate printing service). Regarding claim 10, Nakamoto discloses an information processing apparatus comprising (paragraph 21; client 101): a memory configured to store computer-executable instructions (paragraph 23; program stored in RAM/ROM); and a processor configured to execute the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to (paragraph 23; CPU executing the program in RAM/ROM): cause a display of the information processing apparatus to display a print setting screen for receiving a print setting for printing by a printer(paragraph 38; remote UI for print job operation and settings; paragraph 39-40; Fig. 7 displays print setting screen 701 include for receiving setting for “MAIN UNIT”, “LAN SETTING” of the printer), the displayed print setting screen including (i) a plurality of selectable objects(paragraph 39-40; Fig. 7 displays plurality of selectable links (objects) such as links for “MAIN UNIT SETTINGS”, “LAN SETTINGS”), (ii) an additional selectable object configured such that, when selected, information related to a fixed price print service for the printer is displayed(paragraph 40-43; selection item 702 (additional selectable object) if selected by user clicking on link, flat-rate printing service registration page (information related to a fixed price print service) is displayed for registering for flat-rate (fixed price print service) service). Nakamoto disclose the plurality of selectable objects being configured as stated above. However Nakamoto does not disclose such that, when selectable object is selected, selectable settings to be implemented by the printer when the printer performs printing are displayed and receive one or more selectable settings to be implemented by the printer, when the printer performs printing, via the displayed print setting screen; and cause the printer to perform the printing according to the one or more selectable settings received via the displayed print setting screen. Nakagawa discloses such that, when selectable object is selected, selectable settings to be implemented by the printer when the printer performs printing are displayed (paragraph 16-17, 27-31; when link 406 (selectable object) is selected on initial print setting screen, it switches to display of Fig. 5 which display print settings screen 500 having selectable settings for performing printing such as paper size 505, orientation 506, collation 507, stapling 510 implemented by printer 2500; paragraph 26; ) and receive one or more selectable settings to be implemented by the printer, when the printer performs printing, via the displayed print setting screen (paragraph 31-32; selection of stapling 510 on display print settings screen 500); and cause the printer to perform the printing according to the one or more selectable settings received via the displayed print setting screen (paragraph 28; when print button 408 is selected the printer prints based on selected settings on display print settings screen 500). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Nakagawa to provide print setting screen to provide selectable settings. The motivation to combine the references is to provide link which when selected provides detailed print specific setting items such as stapling, collation and sheet size selection to help user select specific settings for printing a print job (paragraph 16-17, 27-31). Regarding claim 11, see rejection of claim 1. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa further in view of US 20220103717 to Yamada. Regarding claim 2, Nakamoto discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the control method further comprises causing the information processing apparatus to obtain information relating to the fixed price print service (paragraph 41-42; client device obtains the “Web page data for the flat-rate printing service registration page”( information relating to the fixed price print service) from the service provision apparatus 107). However Nakamoto does not disclose obtaining information relating to the fixed price print service from the printer. Yamada discloses obtaining information relating to the fixed price print service from the printer (paragraph 55, 89; acquiring from printer information indicating change to contract mode associated with flat-rate printing). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Yamada to obtain fixed price data directly from printer. The motivation to combine the references is to enable a printer to operate in normal mode and contract mode of fixed price printing based on the type of attached cartridge and to be able to obtain from the printer information about which of those two modes is set for the printer (paragraph 55, 89). Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa further in view of US 20220103717 to Yamada further in view of JP 2013207711 to Yomogida. Regarding claim 3, Nakamoto discloses information related to the fixed price print service (paragraph 40-43; flat-rate printing service registration page (information related to a fixed price print service)). Yamada discloses connection to the printer (paragraph 35; connection to the printing device). However Nakamoto does not disclose the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 2, wherein the control method further comprises: causing the information processing apparatus to determine whether the information processing apparatus is connected; and displaying information indicating that the information is old information on the display in a case where it is determined that the information processing apparatus is not connected. Yomogida discloses causing the information processing apparatus to determine whether the information processing apparatus is connected (paragraph 31, determining whether the PDA9 (information processing apparatus) is connected to server 7); and displaying information indicating that the information is old information on the display in a case where it is determined that the information processing apparatus is not connected (paragraph 35-37; when disconnected to server, the background color in menu is displayed with red color indicating old data). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Yomogida to provide display notification of old data based on connection. The motivation to combine the references is to let the user easily know whether the current data displayed is old data or updated data from a server by changing display color of the data area based on the status of the connection to the server (paragraph 35-37). Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa further in view of JP 2013207711 to Yomogida. Regarding claim 5, Nakamoto discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 4, discloses the information related to the fixed price print service (paragraph 40-43; flat-rate printing service registration page (information related to a fixed price print service)). However Nakamoto does not disclose causing the information processing apparatus to determine whether obtainment of the information is succeeded and displaying information indicating that the information may be old information on the display in a case where it is determined that the obtainment of the information is not succeeded. Yomogida discloses causing the information processing apparatus to determine whether obtainment of the information is succeeded (paragraph 34; when latest data is sent from server to PDA9 (information processing apparatus) then obtainment is success) and displaying information indicating that the information may be old information on the display in a case where it is determined that the obtainment of the information is not succeeded (paragraph 34-37; in determining obtaining data not succeeded due to disconnection with server, the background color in menu is displayed with red color indicating old data). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Yomogida to provide display notification of old data based on connection. The motivation to combine the references is to let the user easily know whether the current data displayed is old data or updated data from a server by changing display color of the data area based on the status of the connection to the server (paragraph 35-37). Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa in view of US 20160292550 to Kawai. Regarding claim 6, Nakamoto does not disclose the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the information related to the fixed price print service is not displayed on the display in a case where use of the printer is not restricted. Kawai discloses wherein the information related to the fixed price print service is not displayed on the display in a case where use of the printer is not restricted (paragraph 51-52, 76-77; in fixed price printing using specific cartridge number of sheets printed is restricted based on service; however in normal printing (normal cartridge) there is no restriction on number of sheet printing; if the normal cartridge is connected, then the display 230 indicating the service ON and num sheets printed is NOT displayed (information related to the fixed price print service)) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Kawai to provide control of fixed price information display based on use restriction. The motivation to combine the references is to provide a user with display information to readily indicate to user what type of printing mode is currently being used so that user can perform printing in accordance with the mode being normal or restricted fixed price printing in which user can find out amount of printed sheet on display (see Fig. 19; 51-52, 76-77). Claim(s) 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa further in view of WO 2023075836 to Kim. Regarding claim 7, Nakamoto does not disclose the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 1, wherein the information related to the fixed price print service includes information related to a remaining printable sheet number based on a contract of the fixed price print service. Kim discloses wherein the information related to the fixed price print service includes information related to a remaining printable sheet number based on a contract of the fixed price print service (paragraph 21-22, 88; service plan information (information related to the fixed price print service) includes info about remaining number of pages of quota from monthly fixed pricing such as 700 pages/month). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Kim to provide fixed price print service information on the display. The motivation to combine the references is to provide user with displayed information about the remaining printable sheet to help in selecting a printer and also provide update to the remaining printable sheet so that the user is informed about the latest information of the printer (paragraph 76-77). Regarding claim 8, Nakamoto discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 7, wherein an object for indicating information related to the fixed price print service with the printer is displayed on the print setting screen (paragraph 40; hyperlink 703 (object for indicating information related to the fixed price print service) is displayed on print setting screen 701). Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200005102 to Nakamoto in view of JP 2015170295 to Nakagawa further in view of WO 2023075836 to Kim in view of US 20090261524 to Nakayama. Regarding claim 9, Kim discloses the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 8, remaining printable sheet number based on the contract of the fixed price print service (paragraph 21-22, 88; service plan information (information related to the fixed price print service) includes info about remaining number of pages of quota from monthly fixed pricing such as 700 pages/month). However Nakamoto in view of Kim does not disclose wherein the control method further comprises highlighting the object in a case where the remaining printable sheet number is smaller than a predetermined threshold. Nakayama discloses wherein the control method further comprises highlighting the object in a case where the remaining printable sheet number is smaller than a predetermined threshold (paragraph 316, 326, 528; print driver displays the screen in Fig. 9 which includes highlighting by graying object 201a when number of sheets is less than 1 (ie. 0) (threshold)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify the system of Nakamoto as taught by Nakayama to provide highlighted display by driver to indicate remaining number of sheets in printer. The motivation to combine the references is to provide clear highlighted display of when the remaining sheet is low and provide user option to make changes to fix the problem with sheet (paragraph 316). Other Prior Art Cited 14. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20200004477 to Morita discloses print driver communicating with printers to acquire capability. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENIYAM MENBERU whose telephone number is (571) 272-7465. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday, 10:00am-6:30pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Akwasi Sarpong can be reached on (571) 270-3438. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the customer service office whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600. The group receptionist number for TC 2600 is (571) 272-2600. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see <http://pair-direct.uspto.gov/>. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Patent Examiner Beniyam Menberu /BENIYAM MENBERU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2681 09/03/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 20, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749168
METHODS FOR EXAMINING A CONDITION OF A SENSOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744852
COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MANAGING DEVICES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744854
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734823
MECHANISM FOR GENERATING SUB RANGE TRANSFER FUNCTIONS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731232
CHROMATIC ABERRATION CORRECTION FOR FOVEATED DISPLAY
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 734 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month