Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/594,545

COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER ALLOCATION IN DISTRIBUTED MULTIPLE INPUT AND MULTIPLE OUTPUT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 04, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0028679
Examiner
TORRES, JUAN A
Art Unit
2634
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
920 granted / 1051 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1065
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1051 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTNF 18/594,545 CTNF 80488 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Priority 02-26 AIA Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/04/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings filed on 03/04/2024 are accepted by the Examiner. Specification The disclosure filed on 03/04/2024 is accepted by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected as failing to define the invention in the manner required by 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. The claim(s) are narrative in form and with indefinite language . The structure which goes to make up the device must be clearly and positively specified. The structure must be organized and correlated in such a manner as to present a complete operative device. Regarding claim 1, the recitation in line 2 of claim 1 “when a change cycle of a transmit power determination vector arrives” is indefinite because appears to be a contingent limitation rather than a positive limitation. "when" suggests a condition that might or might not occur, which can lead to ambiguity about what is actually claimed. Regarding claims 2-9, they are rejected because they depend directly or indirectly from claim 1 and claim 1 is rejected. Regarding claim 10, the recitation in line 2 of claim 10 “when an update cycle of a downlink message arrives” is indefinite because appears to be a contingent limitation rather than a positive limitation. "when" suggests a condition that might or might not occur, which can lead to ambiguity about what is actually claimed. Regarding claims 11-15 and 20, they are rejected because they depend directly or indirectly from claim 10 and claim 10 is rejected. Regarding claim 16, the recitation in line 3 of claim 16 “when a change cycle of a transmit power determination vector arrives” is indefinite because appears to be a contingent limitation rather than a positive limitation. "when" suggests a condition that might or might not occur, which can lead to ambiguity about what is actually claimed. Regarding claims 17-19, they are rejected because they depend directly or indirectly from claim 16 and claim 16 is rejected. Regarding claim 20, claim 20 recites the limitation "The dAP according to claim 11" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner’s Note: It seems that claim 20 should depend from claim 16 instead of claim 11. Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure : Shattil (US 20150263835 A1) discloses cooperative wireless networks. Tsui (US 20230164003 A1) discloses method and system for controlling downlink transmit power. Sundaresan (US 20150023248 A1) discloses multi-user multiple input multiple output (MIMO) communication with distributed antenna systems in wireless networks. Ly (US 20230397133 A1) discloses DL power allocation in inter-band CA including carriers without SSB. Yang (US 20240089874 A1) discloses low complexity precoder. Boudreau (US 12531597 B2) discloses distributed coordinated downlink precoding for multi-cell MIMO wireless network virtualization. Fehri (US 11411794 B2) discloses artificial neutral network precoding for massive MIMO systems. Frenger (US 12028131 B2) discloses apparatuses and methods for sequential transmit precoding. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUAN A TORRES whose telephone number is (571)272-3119. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth N Vanderpuye can be reached at (571) 272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUAN A TORRES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2634 Application/Control Number: 18/594,545 Page 2 Art Unit: 2634 Application/Control Number: 18/594,545 Page 3 Art Unit: 2634 Application/Control Number: 18/594,545 Page 4 Art Unit: 2634 Application/Control Number: 18/594,545 Page 5 Art Unit: 2634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2024
Application Filed
May 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707455
SCHEDULING METHOD, PARAMETER TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696099
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689400
DIGITAL PRE-DISTORTION CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR GENERATING PRE-DISTORTION SIGNAL
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684522
MOVING TARGET INDICATOR (MTI) FILTER CONFIGURATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684321
MULTI-ACCESS EDGE COMPUTING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1051 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month