Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/594,889

STEM-LIKE PLATFORM STATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 04, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2023 — provisional 63/449,805
Examiner
DUONG, DUC T
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Solutions Humanitas Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
683 granted / 765 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim limitations “sensors module”, “motorized positioning system”, “telecommunications module”, “antenna management module”, “configurable deployment module”, “collaborative dispatch module”, and “energy management mechanism” invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. However, the written description fails to disclose the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the entire claimed function and to clearly link the structure, material, or acts to the function. Fig. 1 and paragraphs 0023-0047 of the specification designate “black boxes” to perform the limitations, and as such the specification fails to disclose an adequate structure for the claim limitations (i.e. how/what such “module/system/mechanism” are implemented with). The reason that the claim is indefinite is that without a limiting specification, which is required by statute, the claim limitation becomes an unbounded purely functional limitation. There are no boundaries or limits imposed by structure, material or acts. The claim will cover all ways of performing a function, known and unknown. Therefore, the claim is indefinite and is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Applicant may: (a) Amend the claim so that the claim limitation will no longer be interpreted as a limitation under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph; (b) Amend the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites what structure, material, or acts perform the entire claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (c) Amend the written description of the specification such that it clearly links the structure, material, or acts disclosed therein to the function recited in the claim, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)). If applicant is of the opinion that the written description of the specification already implicitly or inherently discloses the corresponding structure, material, or acts and clearly links them to the function so that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize what structure, material, or acts perform the claimed function, applicant should clarify the record by either: (a) Amending the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function and clearly links or associates the structure, material, or acts to the claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (b) Stating on the record what the corresponding structure, material, or acts, which are implicitly or inherently set forth in the written description of the specification, perform the claimed function. For more information, see 37 CFR 1.75(d) and MPEP §§ 608.01(o) and 2181. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record Tashiro et al (US Publication 2024/0129023 A1) discloses a platform station 110 (fig. 19) comprising: a sensors module 120 (page 9 paragraph 0102); a motorized positioning system for maintaining a target position in an environment (page 8 paragraph 0095); and an antenna management module 111 configured to enhance antenna alignment of one or more antennas (page 8 paragraph 0092). However, the prior art of record fails to teach for “a configurable deployment module configured to selectively deploy one or more networking functionalities; a collaborative dispatch module configured to: set the target position considering a dispatch requirement settings; and logically combine with at least one of the one or more surrounding network nodes before selectively deploying the one or more networking functionalities, while logically combined, based on the dispatch requirement settings; and an energy management mechanism configured to participate in energy exchange with at least one of the surrounding platform stations while the one or more networking functionalities is uninterruptedly deployed”, when such configurable deployment, collaborative dispatch, and energy management are considered within the specific structure of the device recited in claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Duc T Duong whose telephone number is (571)272-3122. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri; 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached at (571)272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUC T DUONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2024
Application Filed
May 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683726
Bandwidth Parts Operation in Multiple Active Bandwidth Parts
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677325
Random Access Process in New Radio
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677291
DOWNLINK CHANNEL QUALITY ASSESSMENT AT USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672160
METHOD FOR BEAM MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNICATION DEVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND APPARATUS USING METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671536
DETERMINING AN AVAILABLE SLOT FOR AN APERIODIC SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL (SRS) RESOURCE SET
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.2%)
2y 10m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month