Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/595,501

SEALING STRUCTURE FOR OPTOELECTRONIC TRANSCEIVER DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Examiner
STAHL, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aip Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1122 granted / 1246 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1282
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§102
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1246 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2012/0027364 A1. Claim 1: '364 discloses a sealing structure for an optoelectronic transceiver device, the optoelectronic transceiver device comprising (see mainly figs. 3 and 5): a main board 22, a load board 20 disposed on the main board, a processing unit 46 disposed on the load board (shown in fig. 5), and at least an optical fiber assembly 36 connected to the processing unit, the sealing structure comprising: a first casing 26; a second casing 24 disposed on the load board and assembled with the first casing such that a part of the optical fiber assembly and the processing unit are arranged between the first casing and the second casing, wherein at least a notch portion (not numbered, but visible in fig. 3) is arranged between peripheral portions of the first casing and the second casing; and a sealing element comprising at least a retaining block 18 positioned in the notch portion and encompassing a part of the optical fiber assembly extending out of the notch portion ([0033]). Claim 14: The notch portion comprises a first notch and a second notch (see fig. 3), the first notch is disposed on the first casing 26, the second notch is disposed on the second casing 24 and corresponding to the first notch, and the retaining block 18 is positioned between the first notch and the second notch. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-13 and 15-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of claim 1 and all applicable intervening claims. Claims 19-20 are allowed. Regarding claim 2, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest a sealing strip with a sealing block, in combination with all the other recited elements. Claims 3-9 ultimately depend from claim 2. Regarding claim 10, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest the recited groove, filling port, and sealing material. Claims 11-12 ultimately depend from claim 10. Regarding claim 13, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest that the first and second casings are soldered or welded together so that the retaining block is in an airtight arrangement with the first casing and the second casing. In contrast, '364 uses screws 28 to secure its casings together and does not appear to be concerned with airtightness. Regarding claim 15, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest the recited functional lines arranged in the specific recited manner. Regarding claim 16, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest the recited specific structure for its retaining block 18. Claim 18 depends from claim 16. Regarding claim 17, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest an optoelectronic transceiver module comprising a base and a waveguide device disposed in the base. '364 is silent as to any waveguide devices. Regarding independent claim 19, the applied '364 reference does not disclose or suggest the recited waveguide device as mentioned above, in combination with all the other recited elements. Claim 20 depends from claim 19. Contact Information Examiner: 571-272-2360 Examiner's direct supervisor: 571-272-2397 Official correspondence by fax: 571-273-8300 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Should you have questions about Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Michael Stahl/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596234
OPTICAL MODULE AND OPTICAL CONNECTOR CABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591093
FACILITATING OPTICAL COUPLING AND BEAM COLLIMATION IN PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585117
WAVEGUIDE FOR AUGMENTED REALITY OR VIRTUAL REALITY DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587002
CONDUIT AND METHOD FOR LAYING CABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585061
LIGHT-EMITTING MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1246 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month