Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/595,608

ILLUMINATED ANATOMICAL MODELS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Examiner
UTAMA, ROBERT J
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Arthrex, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
483 granted / 803 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 803 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 18-24 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/18/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by East US 20150339954 Claim 1: The East reference provides a teaching of a system for a surgical procedure comprising: a physical anatomical model (see FIG. 1 item 110) including a main body representative of anatomy (see FIG. 1 item 110 showing the lumbar), the main body comprising: one or more bone components each having a surface contour representative of a respective bone (see FIG. 2 item 138 vertebrae); and one or more soft tissue components on the one or more bone components, wherein the one or more soft tissue components are representative of soft tissue and are transparent or translucent (see paragraph 30 translucent vertebral disc); and a light source embedded in the main body (see paragraph 33 light source postioned within the vertebral column). Claim 2: The East reference provides a teaching of wherein the light source is at least partially embedded in the one or more bone components (see paragraph 33 light source positioned within the vertebral column). Claim 3: The East reference provides a teaching of wherein the light source is situated between the one or more bone components and the one or more soft tissue components (see paragraph 33 light position within the vertebral column or disc between the vertebrae). Claim 25: The East reference provides a teaching of comprising: an imaging fixture dimensioned to engage an imaging device such that the imaging device faces the physical anatomical model (see paragraph 36 surgical hardware to aid the imaging hardware). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-8, 10-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over East US 20150339954 and in view of Lazarus US 8,827,720 Claim 4: The East reference is silent on the teaching of the light source includes first and second modes associated with first and second frequency ranges, respectively; the one or more bone components comprise a first material responsive to light in the first frequency range, but not the second frequency range; and the one or more soft tissue components comprise a second material responsive to light in the second frequency range, but not the first frequency range. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of the light source includes first and second modes associated with first and second frequency ranges, respectively (see col. 11:20-25); the one or more bone components comprise a first material responsive to light in the first frequency range, but not the second frequency range (see col. 11:30-40); and the one or more soft tissue components comprise a second material responsive to light in the second frequency range, but not the first frequency range (see col. 12:7-21). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the with the feature of the light source includes first and second modes associated with first and second frequency ranges, respectively; the one or more bone components comprise a first material responsive to light in the first frequency range, but not the second frequency range; and the one or more soft tissue components comprise a second material responsive to light in the second frequency range, but not the first frequency range; as taught by the Lazarus reference, in order to provide a realistic training model that respond to the user’s action (see abstract). Claims 5 and 12: The East reference is silent on the teaching of wherein the light source includes a first light module and a second light module spaced apart from the first light module, the first and second light modules being independently controllable. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of wherein the light source includes a first light module and a second light module spaced apart from the first light module, the first and second light modules being independently controllable (see cool. 10:25-35 different LEDs reacting to different application force that is detected by the sensor). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the East reference with the feature of wherein the light source includes a first light module and a second light module spaced apart from the first light module, the first and second light modules being independently controllable, as taught by the Lazarus reference, in order to provide a realistic training model that respond to the user’s action (see abstract). Claim 6: The East reference is silent on the teaching of wherein: the main body extends along a first axis; the first light module extends along a first reference plane extending along the first axis; the second light module extends along a second reference plane extending along the first axis; and the first and second reference planes are circumferentially offset to establish an angle. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of wherein: the main body extends along a first axis; the first light module extends along a first reference plane extending along the first axis (see col. 11:30-35; the second light module extends along a second reference plane extending along the first axis; and the first and second reference planes are circumferentially offset to establish an angle (see col. 11:35-45). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the East reference with the feature of wherein: the main body extends along a first axis; the first light module extends along a first reference plane extending along the first axis; the second light module extends along a second reference plane extending along the first axis; and the first and second reference planes are circumferentially offset to establish an angle, as taught by the Lazarus reference, in order to provide a realistic training model that respond to the user’s action (see abstract). Claim 7: The East reference is silent on the teaching of wherein the first light module and/or the second light module includes an array of light emitting diodes distributed along a respective one of the first and second reference planes. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of wherein the first light module and/or the second light module includes an array of light emitting diodes distributed along a respective one of the first and second reference planes (see col. 11:30-40). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the East reference with the feature of wherein the first light module and/or the second light module includes an array of light emitting diodes distributed along a respective one of the first and second reference planes Claim 8 and 13: The east reference provides a teaching of wherein: the angle is approximately 90 degrees or more; and/or the first reference plane is associated with an anterior-posterior view of the physical anatomical model, and the second reference plane is associated with a lateral view of the physical anatomical model. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of wherein: the angle is approximately 90 degrees or more; and/or the first reference plane is associated with an anterior-posterior view of the physical anatomical model, and the second reference plane is associated with a lateral view of the physical anatomical model (see col. 12:10-25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the East reference with the feature of wherein: the angle is approximately 90 degrees or more; and/or the first reference plane is associated with an anterior-posterior view of the physical anatomical model, and the second reference plane is associated with a lateral view of the physical anatomical model; as taught by the Lazarus reference, in order to provide a realistic training model that respond to the user’s action (see abstract). Claim 10: While the East reference provides a teaching of least one indicator embedded in the main body (see paragraph 33); the East reference is silent on the teaching of at least one indicator adapted to selectively illuminate in response to the light source. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of at least one indicator adapted to selectively illuminate in response to the light source (see col. 10:15-24). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the East reference with the feature of at least one indicator adapted to selectively illuminate in response to the light source, as taught by the Lazarus reference, in order to provide a realistic training model that respond to the user’s action (see abstract). Claim 11: The East reference provide a teaching of A physical anatomical model for a surgical procedure (see abstract) comprising: an opaque bone component representative of bone (see FIG. 2 item 138 vertebrae opaque material and paragraph 26); a transparent or translucent soft tissue component representative of soft tissue, the soft tissue component disposed along a circumference of the bone component (see paragraph 30 translucent vertebral disc); and a light source between the bone component and the soft tissue component (see paragraph 33 light position within the vertebral column or disc between the vertebrae). The East reference is silent on the teaching of the light source including a plurality of light modules distributed about the circumference of the bone component. However, the Lazarus reference provides a teaching of the light source including a plurality of light modules distributed about the circumference of the bone component (see col. 12:10-25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the East reference with the feature of the light source including a plurality of light modules distributed about the circumference of the bone component, as taught by the Lazarus reference, in order to provide a realistic training model that respond to the user’s action (see abstract). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J UTAMA whose telephone number is (571)272-1676. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 - 17:30 Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571)270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT J UTAMA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603016
WEARABLE TERMINAL, PRESENTATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12562072
ADAPTIVE AUDIO AND AUDIOVISUAL RECURSIVE SELF-FEEDBACK FOR SPEECH THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12548457
METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR ASSISTED EXECUTION OF AN ACTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12542070
TEACHING AID
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12536788
TRACKING DIET AND NUTRITION USING WEARABLE BIOLOGICAL INTERNET-OF-THINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+30.0%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 803 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month