Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/595,735

SHIPPING PACKAGING AND ITS MANUFACTURING PROCESS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Examiner
BATTISTI, DEREK J
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Compagnie Europeenne De Papeterie
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
464 granted / 909 resolved
-19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 909 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the sheets joined together by glue dots by at least some of the tops of the ridges must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). Also, the first sheet of paper features alternating ridges and depressions on one of its sides corresponding to respective depressions and ridges on its other side, the tops of the ridges being located in the same plane or substantially in the same plane must be shown. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the second sheet." There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vormwald et al. (2022/0324631). Regarding claim 1, Vormwald discloses a shipping packaging of pouch or envelope type (Fig. 8A), comprising a front wall and a rear wall, assembled so as to define at least one inner compartment, the package comprising an opening that engages with at least one inner compartment so that at least one object can be inserted, a flap (14) with an open position in which the inner compartment is accessible through its opening, and a closed position in which the flap at least partially covers this opening, characterized in that at least one of the front and rear walls comprises at least two sheets (4, 22), a first of the sheets (22) of paper being embossed ([0027]) to form a cushioning element, the first sheet of paper has ridges on at least one of its sides corresponding to depressions on its other side, the second sheet (4) or at least a second smooth or substantially smooth sheet, with at least the portions of these two sheets placed facing the inner compartment, and are capable of being joined together solely by at least some of the tops of the ridges on one side of the first sheet being attached to the second smooth or substantially smooth sheet ([0016], [0031]). See Figs. 1-8A. Regarding claim 3, the first sheet of paper features alternating ridges and depressions on one of its sides corresponding to respective depressions and ridges on its other side, the tops of the ridges being located in the same plane or substantially in the same plane. See Fig. 2. Regarding claim 5, at least forty percent, and preferably at least sixty percent, and even more preferably at least seventy-five percent of the tops of the ridges of the first sheet of paper are joined with the second smooth or almost smooth sheet. See Fig. 2. Regarding claim 6, the ridges feature a shape chosen from the group comprising domes, cones, truncated cones and combinations of these. See Fig. 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vormwald et al. (2022/0324631) in view of Deis (DE 2018110816). Regarding claim 1, Vormwald discloses a shipping packaging of pouch or envelope type (Fig. 8A), comprising a front wall and a rear wall, assembled so as to define at least one inner compartment, the package comprising an opening that engages with at least one inner compartment so that at least one object can be inserted, a flap (34) with an open position in which the inner compartment is accessible through its opening, and a closed position in which the flap at least partially covers this opening, characterized in that at least one of the front and rear walls comprises at least two sheets (14, 18, 26), a first of the sheets (18, 26) of paper being embossed ([0027]) to form a cushioning element, the first sheet of paper has ridges on at least one of its sides corresponding to depressions on its other side, the second sheet (14) or at least a second smooth or substantially smooth sheet, with at least the portions of these two sheets placed facing the inner compartment See Figs. 1-8A. In the case that Vormwald does not disclose the joining as claimed; Dies, which is drawn to a shipping package, discloses sheets being joined together solely by at least some of the tops of the ridges on one side of the first sheet being attached to the second smooth or substantially smooth sheet ([0012]). See Fig. 5. Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to join the sheets of Vormwald as disclosed by Dies in order to create various levels of rigidity. Regarding claim 2, as modified above, at least a portion of these two sheets placed facing at least one inner compartment are joined together solely by glue dots connecting at least some of the tops of the ridges of one side of the first sheet to the second smooth or substantially smooth sheet. Regarding claims 3, 5 and 6, Vormwald sufficiently discloses the claimed invention. See Fig. 5. Regarding claim 4, Vormwald discloses the claimed invention except for height and thickness as claimed. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have the claimed height and thickness since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. See In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Regarding claim 7, each of the front and rear walls comprises at least two sheets, a first of the sheets being embossed to form a cushioning element, the first sheet of paper comprising ridges on at least one of its sides corresponding to depressions on the other of its sides, the second sheet or at least a second of the sheets being smooth or substantially smooth, at least the portions of the two sheets being placed facing the at least one compartment, being joined (as modified above) together only by points of glue connecting the tops of the ridges of one side of the first sheet to the second smooth or substantially smooth sheet. Regarding claim 8, Vormwald does not disclose a third sheet. Dies discloses front and rear walls each comprising three sheets, the said first sheet is embossed and is held between a smooth or substantially smooth sheet called the outer surface of the packaging and another smooth or substantially smooth sheet called the inner surface of the packaging, the portion of the first embossed sheet being placed facing at least one inner compartment which is joined solely to the smooth or substantially smooth sheet forming the outer surface of the packaging. See Figs. 5-6. Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have three sheets as disclosed by Dies in order to better protect items therein. Claim(s) 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vormwald and Deis as applied above in further view of Dworkin (US 3,860,164). Regarding claims 9 and 10, Vormwald does not discloses gussets or flap as claimed. Dworkin, which is drawn to a packaging, discloses the packaging comprising a first edge containing the opening and a second opposite edge defining the bottom of the packaging, the second edge comprising a bottom gusset (15) and the edges of the packaging connecting the first and second edges each comprising a so-called side gusset (18), the gussets being configured to give the packaging a box shape when deployed, or activated, a flap (28) being shaped to ensure this box closes in its closed position; the flap having a V-shaped cut (between 24 and 26) and crease so that a portion of the flap can be placed between the lateral gussets by folding to close the packaging, the portion then forming a lateral side of the box. See Figs. 1-3. Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to use gussets and flap as disclosed by Dworkin on the packaging of Vormwald in order to allow for expansion of various sized items. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEREK J BATTISTI whose telephone number is (571)270-5709. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEREK J BATTISTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599124
Sporting Dowel Rod
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600543
MULTI-FILM THERMOPLASTIC BAGS HAVING VISUALLY-DISTINCT CONTACT AREAS CREATING TEXT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600527
MULTI-FILM THERMOPLASTIC BAGS HAVING CONTACT AREAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589932
WOVEN PLASTIC BAGS WITH FEATURES THAT REDUCE LEAKAGE, BREAKAGE AND INFESTATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583394
MULTI-USE STORAGE CONTAINER HAVING A HINGED DOOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+36.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 909 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month