Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/596,088

SIDELINK TRANSMISSION POWER CONTROL FOR NEW RADIO SIDELINK AND LONG TERM EVOLUTION SIDELINK CO-CHANNEL COEXISTENCE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Priority
Apr 06, 2023 — provisional 63/494,745
Examiner
WENDELL, ANDREW
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
753 granted / 894 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
912
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
81.5%
+41.5% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 894 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sun et al. (US Pat Pub# 2024/0080780) in view of Bagheri et al. (US Pat Pub# 2019/0320396). Regarding claims 1 and 19-20, Sun teaches a user equipment for wireless communication (Fig. 3), comprising one or more memories 306 (Fig. 3); and one or more processors 302 (Fig. 3) coupled to the one or more memories 306 (Fig. 3) and configured to cause the UE to determine to transmit data associated with a first radio access technology, associated with the first RAT, that map to a time period associated with a second RAT (Abstract, Sections 0006-0011, and 0084-0092, first and second radios that map to a time period and determining transmit power etc.); determine a set of transmit powers (Abstract, Sections 0006-0011, and 0084-0092, determine the set of transmit powers of the radios etc.); and transmit the data associated with the first RAT using the set of transmit powers and in accordance with a first numerology, wherein the first numerology is associated with the first RAT and is different than a second numerology that is associated with the second RAT (Abstract, Sections 0006-0011, and 0084-0092, mobile device determines the transmit powers of the radios and determines the power level value for each that are different from one another etc.). Sun fails to teach a set of consecutive slots. Bagheri teaches a user equipment for wireless communication (Fig. 6), comprising one or more memories 650 (Fig. 6); and one or more processors 620 (Fig. 6) coupled to the one or more memories 650 (Fig. 6) and configured to cause the UE to determine to transmit data associated with a first radio access technology on a set of consecutive slots, associated with the first RAT, that map to a time period associated with a second RAT (Section 0044, 0051, 0055-0056, 0058, 0068, and 0073, LTE and NR radios with consecutive NR slots overlapping with LTE slots etc.); determine a set of transmit powers associated with the set of consecutive slots (Section 0044, 0051, 0055-0056, 0058, 0068, and 0073, LTE and NR radios with consecutive NR slots overlapping with LTE slots and determining transmit power scaling etc.). Therefore, it would have been obvious at the time of the invention to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate a set of consecutive slots as taught by Bagheri into Sun’s device in order to improve efficiency. Regarding claim 2, the combination including Sun teaches wherein the first RAT corresponds to a New Radio standard and the second RAT corresponds to a Long-Term Evolution standard (Section 0046, new radio and LTE). Regarding claim 3, the combination including Bagheri teaches wherein the one or more processors, to cause the UE to transmit the data, are configured to cause the UE to transmit, using a first transmit power, a first portion of the data on a first slot of the set of consecutive slots; and transmit, using a second transmit power, a second portion of the data on a second slot of the set of consecutive slots (Section 0044, 0051, 0055-0056, 0058, 0068, and 0073, LTE and NR radios with consecutive NR slots overlapping with LTE slots and determining transmit power scaling etc.). Regarding claim 4, the combination including Sun teaches wherein the first transmit power is equal to the second transmit power (Section 0103, transmit powers can be equal etc.). Regarding claim 5, the combination including Sun teaches wherein a difference between the first transmit power and the second transmit power satisfies a power difference condition (Abstract, Sections 0006-0011, and 0084-0092, mobile device determines the transmit powers of the radios and determines the power level value for each that are different from one another etc.). Regarding claim 6, the combination including Sun teaches wherein the power difference condition comprises a threshold value (Abstract, Sections 0006-0011, and 0084-0092, mobile device determines the transmit powers of the radios based on thresholds and determines the power level value for each that are different from one another etc.). Regarding claim 7, the combination including Sun teaches wherein the power difference condition comprises a range of values (Section 0099, within a range of power values etc.). Regarding claim 8, the combination including Sun teaches wherein the first transmit power is greater than or equal to the second transmit power (Abstract, Sections 0006-0011, and 0084-0092, mobile device determines the transmit powers of the radios and determines the power level value for each that are different from one another etc.). Regarding claim 9, the combination including Bagheri teaches wherein the first slot overlaps a first portion of the time period associated with the second RAT (Section 0044, 0051, 0055-0056, 0058, 0068, and 0073, LTE and NR radios with consecutive NR slots overlapping with LTE slots). Regarding claim 17, the combination including Sun teaches wherein the first transmit power is based on a first priority associated with the first portion of the data and the second transmit power is based on a second priority associated with the second portion of the data (Sections 0101-0111, transmit power based on priority etc.). Regarding claim 18, the combination including Bagheri teaches wherein the one or more processors, to cause the UE to transmit a first portion of the data in a first slot of the set of consecutive slots, are configured to cause the UE to transmit the first portion of the data in the first slot based on a first priority associated with the first portion of the data and a second priority associated with a second portion of the data (Sections 0044 and 0085-0093, priorities based on slots etc.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW WENDELL whose telephone number is (571)272-0557. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at 571-272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW WENDELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648 3/25/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 20, 2026
Interview Requested
May 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627951
FIFTH GENERATION CORE ENHANCEMENTS TO SUPPORT AD HOC AND DYNAMIC GROUP BASED SERVICES FOR EDGE DEPLOYMENTS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628084
ADAPTIVE, POWER-EFFICIENT TRANSMITTER CONTROL FOR BATTERY-POWERED WIRELESS SENSORS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620958
MULTIPLEXER WITH HYBRID ACOUSTIC PASSIVE FILTER
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12609719
ARCHITECTURE FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE RADIO FREQUENCY SMART NODE
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610327
MULTI-RANGE POWER DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 4m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 894 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month