Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 07, 2026
Application No. 18/596,701

ZOOM LENS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 06, 2024
Priority
Apr 03, 2023 — JP 2023-060157
Examiner
MEDICH, ANGELA MARGOT
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
387 granted / 579 resolved
-1.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
603
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 579 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-22 are currently pending in the present application. Election/Restrictions Claims 1 and 22 are allowable. Claims 2, 4, 7, 10-12, 15-17, and 19-21, previously withdrawn from consideration as a result of a restriction requirement, require all the limitations of an allowable claim. Pursuant to the procedures set forth in MPEP § 821.04(a), the restriction requirement between species, as set forth in the Office action mailed on 26 February 2026, is hereby withdrawn and claims 2, 4, 7, 10-12, 15-17, and 19-21are hereby rejoined and fully examined for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104. In view of the withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant(s) are advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once the restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The IDSs dated 06 March 2024, 11 April 2024, and 13 August 2024 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to for containing a typographical error. The term “nd3PA” should read “vd3PA”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re: claim 20, the meaning of the limitation “the four or more lens units” is unclear. It is not clear as to whether the limitation refers to “four or more lenses” as recited in line 1 of claim 1 or whether some other lenses or lens units are being referred to. In addition, the meaning of the limitation “a fourth lens” in line 3 of the claim is unclear. It is not clear as to whether the limitation is intended to refer to a fourth lens unit or whether the limitation refers to the “four or more lenses” recited in line 1 of claim 1. Re: claim 21, the meaning of the limitation “the four or more lens units” is unclear. It is not clear as to whether the limitation refers to “four or more lenses” as recited in line 1 of claim 1 or whether some other lenses or lens units are being referred to. In addition, the meaning of the limitation “a fourth lens” in line 3 of the claim is unclear. It is not clear as to whether the limitation is intended to refer to a fourth lens unit or whether the limitation refers to the “four or more lenses” recited in line 1 of claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. Claims 20-21 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding independent claims 1 and 22, prior art reference Ogata (US 20150168697), now made of record, discloses a zoom lens (Figs. 1A-1C; para. 221) comprising four or more lenses (Fig. 1A discloses 17 total lenses) that include, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens unit G1 having positive refractive power (para. 221 discloses positive), a second lens unit G2 having negative refractive power (para. 221 discloses negative), and a third lens unit G3 having positive refractive power (para. 221 discloses positive), wherein a distance between adjacent lens units changes during zooming from a wide-angle end to a telephoto end (changing distances disclosed in Figs. 1A – 1C & para. 222), wherein for zooming from the wide-angle end to the telephoto end, the first lens unit and the third lens unit are fixed relative to an image plane, and the second lens unit moves toward the image side (para. 222 discloses that among lens units G1, G2, and G3, only G2 moves), wherein the third lens unit includes three lens elements each having positive refractive power (para. 228 discloses that L8, L10, and L11 are positive). However, Ohashi does not explicitly disclose that the following inequalities are satisfied: 0.005 < f3/ft < 0.150 1.902 < nd3u < 2.300 -0.50 < β2w < -0.01 where f3 is a focal length of the third lens unit, ft is a focal length of the zoom lens at the telephoto end, nd3u is a maximum value among refractive indices for d-line of lenses included in the third lens unit, and β2w is a lateral magnification of the second lens at the wide-angle end. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGELA MEDICH whose telephone number is (313)446-4819. The examiner can normally be reached M-T & Th-F 10:00 AM - 7:00 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANGELA M. MEDICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2024
Application Filed
May 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691702
MICRO-OPTIC SECURITY DEVICE WITH MULTI-PHASE ICON STRUCTURE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687719
HEAD-UP DISPLAY AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687662
DISPLAY PANEL, METASURFACE LENS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12674999
AERIAL DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675022
LIGHT PATH CONTROL MEMBER, DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIGHT PATH CONTROL MEMBER
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 579 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month