Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/597,715

COLOR MATCHING FOR A PRINTER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 06, 2024
Examiner
BECK, ALEXANDER S
Art Unit
2600
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ricoh Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 11m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allow Rate
55 granted / 121 resolved
-16.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 11m
Avg Prosecution
81 currently pending
Career history
202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 121 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 4. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9-12 and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Japanese Application Publication JP 2004-112270 A (hereinafter “Igura”) Regarding claim 1, Igura discloses a method of color matching, the method comprising: - loading a color sample file of a color sample, wherein the color sample file includes color measurements for the color sample (primary color patch data storage unit 21 stores primary color patch data for causing a target output device to print a primary color patch (paragraph [0023]), the color patch data consisting of sample colors arranged in the primary color gradation patches 201-204 of the basic colors C, M, Y, and K, respectively (paragraph [0024])); - generating a patch chart image by: - processing the color measurements for the color sample to select target colors from the color sample (target printer prints primary color patches from primary color patch data stored in the primary color patch data storage unit (paragraph [0041]); tristimulus values of each sample color are measured and stored in primary color patch colorimetric result storage unit 22 (paragraph [0042]), after which a representative color is determined by representative color determining unit 12 for each of the basic colors based on the tristimulus values of each sample color (paragraph [0043])); and - generating the patch chart image comprising color patch objects corresponding with the target colors (when the representative colors of the basic colors are determined, secondary-color-patch-data creating unit 13 creates secondary-color-patch-data for printing a secondary color patch, and stores the created secondary-color-patch-data in secondary-color-patch-data storage unit 23 (paragraph [0063])); - printing the patch chart image at a target printer to output a patch chart that includes a plurality of color patches corresponding with the color patch objects (output unit 14 outputs the secondary color patch data onto recording media, thereby causing printer to print the secondary color patches (paragraph [0065])); - scanning the patch chart to generate color measurements for the patch chart (measurement device 3 is used to measure tristimulus values of each sample color on the secondary color patch, and the measured tristimulus values are stored in secondary color patch colorimetry result storage unit 24 (paragraph [0066])); - generating a color matching profile for the target printer based on the color measurements for the color sample and the color measurements for the patch chart (color conversion table representing a correspondence relationship between the tristimulus values of the sample colors on the secondary color patch stored in secondary color patch colorimetric result storage unit 24 and CMYK values of the sample colors on the secondary color patch stored in secondary color patch storage unit 23 is created and stored in the color conversion table storage unit 25 (paragraph [0067]), from which an ICC profile describing the characteristics is created by ICC profile creation unit 16 (paragraph [0068])); and - registering the color matching profile at the target printer for color-matched printing at the target printer (ICC profile is stored in the ICC profile storage unit 26 (paragraph [0068])). Regarding claim 2, Igura discloses wherein: - the patch chart image comprises one color patch object per target color (sample colors C0 to C255, M0 to M255, Y0 to Y255, and K0 to K255 are arranged in the primary color gradation patches 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the basic colors C, M, Y, and K, respectively (paragraph [0024]); Fig. 2A shows one color patch for each color gradation; also, the primary patch is composed of the primary color gradation patch for each basic color (paragraph [0073])). Regarding claim 4, Igura discloses wherein the processing the color measurements for the color sample comprises: - selecting a subset of colors from the color sample as the target colors (sample color selected from each group of sample colors to be a representative color (paragraph [0015])). Regarding claim 5, Igura discloses wherein the selecting comprises: - grouping multiple colors of the color sample within a threshold color range as one of the target colors (for each basic color, sample colors on a primary color gradation patch of the basic color are grouped into groups of sample colors in which a difference in colorimetric results is within a threshold determined according to the colorimetric results, and a sample color to be a representative color is selected one by one from each group (paragraph [0015])). Regarding claim 9, Igura discloses a color matching apparatus (color conversion table creating apparatus (page 4, lines 21-24)), comprising: - at least one processor (computer 1 (page 4, lines 21-24)) and memory (storage device 2 (page 4, lines 21-24)), wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause the color matching apparatus at least to: - receive a color sample file of a color sample, wherein the color sample file includes color measurements for the color sample (primary color patch data storage unit 21 stores primary color patch data for causing a target output device to print a primary color patch (paragraph [0023]), the color patch data consisting of sample colors arranged in the primary color gradation patches 201-204 of the basic colors C, M, Y, and K, respectively (paragraph [0024])); - generating a patch chart image by: - processing the color measurements for the color sample to select target colors from the color sample (target printer prints primary color patches from primary color patch data stored in the primary color patch data storage unit (paragraph [0041]); tristimulus values of each sample color are measured and stored in primary color patch colorimetric result storage unit 22 (paragraph [0042]), after which a representative color is determined by representative color determining unit 12 for each of the basic colors based on the tristimulus values of each sample color (paragraph [0043])); and - generating the patch chart image comprising color patch objects corresponding with the target colors (when the representative colors of the basic colors are determined, secondary-color-patch-data creating unit 13 creates secondary-color-patch-data for printing a secondary color patch, and stores the created secondary-color-patch-data in secondary-color-patch-data storage unit 23 (paragraph [0063])); - provide an instruction to print the patch chart image at a target printer to output a patch chart, wherein the patch chart includes a plurality of color patches corresponding with the color patch objects (output unit 14 outputs the secondary color patch data onto recording media, thereby causing printer to print the secondary color patches (paragraph [0065])); - provide an instruction to scan the patch chart to generate color measurements for the patch chart (measurement device 3 is used to measure tristimulus values of each sample color on the secondary color patch (paragraph [0066])); -receive the color measurements for the patch chart (the measured tristimulus values are stored in secondary color patch colorimetry result storage unit 24 (paragraph [0066])); - generate a color matching profile for the target printer based on the color measurements for the color sample and the color measurements for the patch chart (color conversion table representing a correspondence relationship between the tristimulus values of the sample colors on the secondary color patch stored in secondary color patch colorimetric result storage unit 24 and CMYK values of the sample colors on the secondary color patch stored in secondary color patch storage unit 23 is created and stored in the color conversion table storage unit 25 (paragraph [0067]), from which an ICC profile describing the characteristics is created by ICC profile creation unit 16 (paragraph [0068])); and - register the color matching profile at the target printer for color-matched printing at the target printer (ICC profile is stored in the ICC profile storage unit 26 (paragraph [0068])). Regarding claim 10, Igura discloses wherein: - the patch chart image comprises one color patch object per target color (sample colors C0 to C255, M0 to M255, Y0 to Y255, and K0 to K255 are arranged in the primary color gradation patches 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the basic colors C, M, Y, and K, respectively (paragraph [0024]); Fig. 2A shows one color patch for each color gradation; also, the primary patch is composed of the primary color gradation patch for each basic color (paragraph [0073])). Regarding claim 11, Igura discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to cause the color matching apparatus at least to: - select a subset of colors from the color sample as the target colors (sample color selected from each group of sample colors to be a representative color (paragraph [0015])). Regarding claim 12, Igura discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to cause the color matching apparatus at least to: - group multiple colors of the color sample within a threshold color range as one of the target colors (for each basic color, sample colors on a primary color gradation patch of the basic color are grouped into groups of sample colors in which a difference in colorimetric results is within a threshold determined according to the colorimetric results, and a sample color to be a representative color is selected one by one from each group (paragraph [0015])). Regarding claim 16, Igura disclose a printing system (color conversion table creating apparatus (paragraph [0021])), comprising: - the color matching apparatus of claim 9 (see above rejection of claim 9); and - the target printer (target output device is a printer (paragraph [0023])). Regarding claim 17, Igura disclose a printing system (color conversion table creating apparatus (paragraph [0021])), comprising: - the color matching apparatus of claim 9 (see above rejection of claim 9); and - a scanner configured to scan the patch chart (measuring device 3 is realized by a spectral reflectometer or the like, and measures the color on the primary color patch and the secondary color patch (paragraph [0031])). Regarding claim 18, Igura discloses a method of color matching, the method comprising: - receiving, at a color matching apparatus, a color sample file of a color sample, wherein the color sample file includes color measurements for the color sample (primary color patch data storage unit 21 stores primary color patch data for causing a target output device to print a primary color patch (paragraph [0023]), the color patch data consisting of sample colors arranged in the primary color gradation patches 201-204 of the basic colors C, M, Y, and K, respectively (paragraph [0024])); - generating a patch chart image at the color matching apparatus by: - processing the color measurements for the color sample to select target colors from the color sample (target printer prints primary color patches from primary color patch data stored in the primary color patch data storage unit (paragraph [0041]); tristimulus values of each sample color are measured and stored in primary color patch colorimetric result storage unit 22 (paragraph [0042]), after which a representative color is determined by representative color determining unit 12 for each of the basic colors based on the tristimulus values of each sample color (paragraph [0043])); and - generating the patch chart image comprising color patch objects corresponding with the target colors (when the representative colors of the basic colors are determined, secondary-color-patch-data creating unit 13 creates secondary-color-patch-data for printing a secondary color patch, and stores the created secondary-color-patch-data in secondary-color-patch-data storage unit 23 (paragraph [0063])); - providing, at the color matching apparatus, an instruction to print the patch chart image at a target printer to output a patch chart, wherein the patch chart includes a plurality of color patches corresponding with the color patch objects (output unit 14 outputs the secondary color patch data onto recording media, thereby causing printer to print the secondary color patches (paragraph [0065])); - providing, at the color matching apparatus, an instruction to scan the patch chart to generate color measurements for the patch chart (measurement device 3 is used to measure tristimulus values of each sample color on the secondary color patch (paragraph [0066])); - receiving, at the color matching apparatus, the color measurements for the patch chart (the measured tristimulus values are stored in secondary color patch colorimetry result storage unit 24 (paragraph [0066])); - generating, at the color matching apparatus, a color matching profile for the target printer based on the color measurements for the color sample and the color measurements for the patch chart (color conversion table representing a correspondence relationship between the tristimulus values of the sample colors on the secondary color patch stored in secondary color patch colorimetric result storage unit 24 and CMYK values of the sample colors on the secondary color patch stored in secondary color patch storage unit 23 is created and stored in the color conversion table storage unit 25 (paragraph [0067]), from which an ICC profile describing the characteristics is created by ICC profile creation unit 16 (paragraph [0068])); and - registering the color matching profile at the target printer for color-matched printing at the target printer (ICC profile is stored in the ICC profile storage unit 26 (paragraph [0068])). Regarding claim 19, Igura discloses wherein: - the patch chart image comprises one color patch object per target color (sample colors C0 to C255, M0 to M255, Y0 to Y255, and K0 to K255 are arranged in the primary color gradation patches 201, 202, 203, and 204 of the basic colors C, M, Y, and K, respectively (paragraph [0024]); Fig. 2A shows one color patch for each color gradation; also, the primary patch is composed of the primary color gradation patch for each basic color (paragraph [0073])). Regarding claim 20, Igura discloses wherein the processing the color measurements for the color sample comprises: - selecting a subset of colors from the color sample as the target colors (sample color selected from each group of sample colors to be a representative color (paragraph [0015])). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 7. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Igura as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Japanese Application Publication JP 2004-120483 A (hereinafter “Takahashi”). Regarding claim 3 Igura does not expressly disclose “wherein the processing the color measurements for the color sample comprises: selecting each color from the color sample as the target colors.” Igura states that the number of representative colors may be designated by a user (paragraph [0069]), but Igura does not expressly state that all of the representative colors may be designated. Takahashi discloses a device for preparing a profile preparation chart, wherein candidate colors of all color patches are obtained, and all or some of the candidate colors are selected to determine CMYK values that define the colors of the color patches, and the CMYK values are arranged in a predetermined manner to create a color chart (paragraph [0074]). From both Igura and Takahashi, it is clear that the number of candidate colors to be used as target colors may be optionally selected, and Takahashi expressly states that all of the candidate colors may be selected. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of Applicant’s invention, to have modified the teaching of Igura for selection of each candidate color as the target colors, as taught by Takahashi, so as to enable a user to reproduce the maximum number of possible colors from a printer. 8. Claims 6 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Igura as applied to claims 5 and 12 above, and further in view of Japanese Application Publication JP 2007-281613 A (hereinafter “Yamamoto”). Regarding claims 6 and 13, Igura does not expressly disclose “assigning a color match value to the one of the target colors by calculating an average of L*a*b* values over the multiple colors of the color sample.” Yamamoto discloses a method wherein color values CI of color patches C1 to C14 are computed. The RGB value of each pixel is converted into an L*a*b* value using the source profile of scanner unit 15, and the average L*a*b* values of the pixels constituting the color patches C1 to C14 are calculated and set as color values CI of the color patches C1 to C14, respectively (paragraph [0022]). The CI values, along with graininess index GI and banding index BI are calculated in creating a quality report QR (paragraph [0033]), and a maintenance request MR may be created based on the quality report (paragraph [0034]). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of Applicant’s invention, to have modified the teaching of Igura by providing for calculation of the CI, GI, and BI values for creating a quality report, so that it can be determined when maintenance of the printer is necessary (paragraphs [0003]-[0004]). 9. Claims 7 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Igura as applied to claims 4 and 11 above, and further in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2024/0362821 A1 (hereinafter “Srivastav”). Regarding claims 7 and 14, Igura does not expressly disclose “wherein the selecting comprises: excluding, from the target colors, colors of the color sample that appear less than a threshold amount in the color sample.” Srivastav discloses a system for generating image metadata using a compact color space. Analysis module 204 receives and processes assigned data 208 to generate a color histogram 502, which indicates numbers of pixel described by input data 114 that are assigned each of colors 156-170. In some examples, the analysis module excludes colors of the colors 156-170 assigned to less than a threshold number of the pixels from the color histogram (paragraph [0048]). Eliminating colors that appear in less than a low number of pixels in the input data simplifies the generation of a color profile by ignoring colors from the data that have little impact on the overall appearance of the sample. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill, at the time of Applicant’s invention, to have modified the teaching of Igura by excluding from target colors the colors of a color sample appearing less than a threshold number of times, as taught by Srivastav. Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claims 8 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 11. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 8, the cited prior art fails to disclose or suggest Applicant’s method of claim 1, further comprising: assigning a color match value to one of the target colors having multiple appearances in the color sample by calculating an average of L*a*b* values over the multiple appearances. Claim 15, directed to a color matching apparatus of claim 9, similarly recite the allowable subject matter of claim 8. 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS D LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7436. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abderrahim Merouan can be reached at 571-270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS D LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 11967097
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHANGE ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 23, 2024
Patent 7990401
LIQUID CRYSTAL DRIVING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DRIVING LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 02, 2011
Patent 7969429
SUSTAIN DRIVER, SUSTAIN CONTROL SYSTEM, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 28, 2011
Patent 7965267
LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 21, 2011
Patent 7932889
LCD WITH ADAPTIVE LUMINANCE INTENSIFYING FUNCTION AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 26, 2011
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+37.2%)
4y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month