Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/598,010

BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Examiner
MUSTANSIR, ABID A
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Omron Healthcare Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
342 granted / 441 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
502
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 441 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The action is in response to the application filed on 03/07/2024. Claims 1-3 are pending and examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1, and claims dependent thereof, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the claim in the preamble recites “A blood pressure measurement device”; but then does not recite actually measuring blood pressure. As such it is unclear as to whether then claimed device actually needs to be capable of measuring blood pressure. As such the claim is indefinite. For the purposes of this examination, the claims are interpreted as the device measuring blood pressure. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20200345247 A1 (hereinafter referred to as “Nishida”) in view of US 10478077 B2 (hereinafter referred to as “Ono”). Regarding claim 1, Nishida, a wrist worn blood pressure measuring device (abstract), teaches a blood pressure measurement device (abstract) comprising: a housing (casing 11; paragraphs [0052]-[0054]; Figure 2); a flow path plate unit accommodated in the housing and at least partially formed of a conductive material (flow path cover 34 made be made of metal; paragraphs [0059]-[0060]; as shown in Figure 11); a pump connected to the flow path plate unit (pump 14; paragraph [0061], [0067]-[0069]; Figure 11-12); a pressure sensor connected to the flow path plate unit (pressure sensor 17; paragraph [0070]; Figure 11-12); a cuff connected to the flow path plate unit and fluidly connected to the pump and the pressure sensor via the flow path plate unit (pressure cuff 71; paragraph [0061], [0067]-[0069]; Figure 11-12); but does not explicitly teach a printed circuit board accommodated in the housing and including GND; and at least one connection member that connects the GND of the printed circuit board and a part of the flow path plate unit formed of the conductive material. However, Ono, blood pressure device, teaches a printed circuit board accommodated in the housing (claim 7) and including GND (printed circuit boards contain GNDs; claim 7); and at least one connection member that connects the GND of the printed circuit board and a part of the flow path plate unit formed of the conductive material (claim 7). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Nishida, to have a PCB, as taught by Ono, because doing so provides a processing device to control a cuff and perform calculations. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2, and claims dependent thereof, are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, the prior art fails to teach or suggest all the limitations of the claim with all of the limitations of the base claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABID A MUSTANSIR whose telephone number is (408)918-7647. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10 am to 6 pm Pacific Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason Sims can be reached at 571-272-7540. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABID A MUSTANSIR/ Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594039
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CORRECTING BIOMETRIC DATA ON BASIS OF DISTANCE BETWEEN ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND USER, MEASURED USING AT LEAST ONE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594033
PHOTOELECTRIC DETECTOR, PPG SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588815
PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNAL MONITORING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588875
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SENSING PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588840
BLOOD OXYGEN CONCENTRATION MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+13.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 441 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month