Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/598,014

VEHICLE EXTERIOR COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Examiner
DUNAY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
539 granted / 715 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 3/7/2024 and 12/17/2025 were filed and are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aizawa (US 2020/0386381 A1) in view of Kuramitsu et al (US 2017/0357044 A1). In regard to claim 1, 3, and 5, Aizawa discloses a vehicle exterior component, comprising: a cover (50) and a housing (40) that are located frontward from a radar device (61) in an electromagnetic wave transmission direction of the radar device, the radar device being installed in a vehicle; a flat substrate (where 80 in mounted) arranged inside the housing; a light emitter (80) arranged on the substrate; and a lens arranged (82) inside the housing, wherein the housing extends over a surface of the cover facing the radar device, the light emitter emits light that illuminates the cover, the substrate is located outside an electromagnetic wave transmission range of the radar device, and the lens reflects (light is pernicious and the LED emits in a Lambertian distribution—there are ray lines which reflect off the side wall of the lens 82 through TIR and refract through the front of the lens) the light from the light emitter toward the cover. (Figure 2; see at least [0039] onward) Where the interpretation of “ornamental portion” is argued, Aizawa fails to disclose an ornamental portion. Kuramitsu et al teaches an outer lens with an ornamental portion (20), and as recited in claim 3 and 5, the ornamental portion of the cover includes a light diffusing layer (30—“pattern printing” satisfies a diffusion layer) that transmits and diffuses incident light. (Figures 2-4; see at least [0026]-[0030]) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to replace the outer lens of Aizawa with that of Kuramitsu et al in order to provide for a decorative appearance. In regard to claim 2, Aizawa discloses the housing includes a flange (41) and a projection (43), the flange being projected toward the cover at a location corresponding to an edge of the cover, and the projection being bent and projected toward the cover at a location closer to a central part of the cover than the flange, the substrate and the lens are located between the projection and the flange, and the lens includes a reflection surface (side wall) and a refraction surface (emitting surface), the reflection surface reflecting the light from the light emitter toward the ornamental portion of the cover, and the refraction surface passing the light reflected by the reflection surface so that the light avoids a corner of the projection located toward the flange. (Figure 2) In regard to claim 4, Aizawa discloses the housing includes a flange (41) and a projection (43), the flange being projected toward the cover at a location corresponding to an edge of the cover, and the projection being bent and projected toward the cover at a location closer to a central part of the cover than the flange, the substrate and the lens are located between the projection and the flange, and a part of the projection of the housing facing the cover includes a white layer (indium) that reflects and diffuses incident light reflected by the ornamental portion of the cover. (Figure 2; see at least [0065]) In regard to claim 6, the combination of Aizawa and Kuramitsu et al teaches the cover and the housing form an emblem. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Bajec Strle et al (US 2025/0167437 A1) disclose a radar. Nakayama et al (US 2023/0266435 A1) disclose a radar. Grard et al (US 2023/0051331 A1) disclose a radar. Potter et al (US 2020/0200356 A1) disclose an IR illuminator. Mayer Pujadas et al (US 2019/0356046 A1) disclose a radar. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY whose telephone number is (571)270-1222. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James (Jong-Suk) Lee can be reached at 571-272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602568
BORN-AGAIN TSK FUZZY CLASSIFIER BASED ON KNOWLEDGE DISTILLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601468
Flexible Trim Device for Enhancing LED Strip Lights
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601472
Connection element for an LED light module
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601458
LIGHT FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595895
MULTI-REGION OPTICS FOR FLAT ILLUMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.8%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month