Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/598,027

ROAMING IN A MULTI-LINK DEVICE TOPOLOGY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cisco Technology Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 634 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-9, 11-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou et al. (hereinafter Zhou)(US 2025/0351179) in view of Fang et al. (hereinafter Fang)(US 2023/0147311) and Huang et al. (hereinafter Huang)(EP 4145947). Regarding claim 1, Zhou teaches a method, comprising: detecting, by an Access Point (AP) actor, that a communication metric characterizing communication between the AP actor and a non-AP actor is indicative of reduced communication quality(P[0305], signal quality of links 1 and link2 may be degraded); in response to detecting, sending a request, by the AP actor, to the non-AP actor for a beacon report for respective link metric values for a plurality of non-collocated AP actors(AP MLD1 carry a reconfiguration multi-link element in a beacon frame); receiving, in response to the request and from the non-AP actor, the beacon report including the respective link metric values for the plurality of non-collocated AP actors(P[0305], signal quality of link 1 and link 2 (collocated actors) may be degraded and received signal strength indicator is below threshold; but the AP MLD 2(non-collocated AP actors) over link 3 to serve non-AP MLD 1); and based on the respective link metric values for the plurality of non-collocated AP actors, sending, by the AP actor, to the non-AP actor, a list of a subset of the plurality of non-collocated AP actors from which the non-AP actor may select to roam(non-AP MLD1 is connected to AP MLD2(many APs connected to AP MLD 2; Fig. 31) over link 3 based on reconfiguration beacon frame). Zhou did not teach specifically receiving information reports from the plurality of non-collocated AP actors via a control plane that interconnects the AP actor and the plurality of non-collocated AP actors. However, Fang teaches in an analogous art receiving information reports from the plurality of non-collocated AP actors via a control plane that interconnects the AP actor and the plurality of non-collocated AP actors(P[0028], provided to non-co-located multiple APs in different locations by using a control plane signaling over the backhaul/over-the air; P[0030], MLD’s mobility pattern, signal strength etc and MLD may inform the A-MLD prior to making a switch). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the method of receiving information reports from the plurality of non-collocated AP actors via a control plane that interconnects the AP actor and the plurality of non-collocated AP actors in order to have efficient switching. Zhou in view of Fang did not teach specifically beacon information. However, Huang teaches in an analogous art beacon information(P[0091], quality of link between the non-AP MLD and the multiple AP MLDs; also P[0160-0167], request and response between AP MLD and non-colocated MLD 3; ). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the beacon information in order to have improved quality. Regarding claim 2, Zhou teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: defining a mobility domain that includes the AP actor and the plurality of non-collocated AP actors; and enabling control plane communication among the AP actor and the plurality of non- collocated AP actors(Fig. 41; non-collocated AP actors; seamless roaming provide control plane roaming (virtual MLD MAC); virtual AP MLD in Fig. 41). Regarding claim 3, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the method of claim 2, further comprising assigning a mobility domain-unique link ID to each AP in the AP actor and to each AP in the plurality of non-collocated AP actors(P[0191], configuration fields include link ID information; P[0305], reconfiguration information). Regarding claim 4, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the method of claim 3, wherein the list of the subset of the plurality of non-collocated AP actors comprises respective mobility domain-unique link IDs corresponding to APs in the plurality of non-collocated AP actors(P[0305], AP MLD 2(non-co-located AP) can carry a multilink element). Regarding claim 5, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the ethod of claim 2, wherein the AP actor and the plurality of non-collocated AP actors are multi-link devices (MLDs)(Fig. 41, MLDs). Regarding claim 6, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the link metric values are comprised of at least one of signal strength or signal quality values. (P[0305], signal strength). Regarding claim 7, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the method of claim 1, wherein sending the list of a subset of the plurality of non- collocated AP actors from which the non-AP actor may select to roam comprises sending the list of a subset of the plurality of non-collocated AP actors via a neighbor report element in at least one of a basic service set transition management (BTM) request frame, a BTM query frame, or neighbor report response frame(Zhou: P[0181], multi-AP MLD sounding reference frame includes virtual basic service sets; candidate set ID field; Huang: P[0102], candidate list field may carry neighbor report). Regarding claim 8, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising executing, with the non-AP actor, a roaming procedure by a selected one of the plurality of non-collocated AP actors on the list of a subset of the plurality of non-collocated AP actors(P[0305], reconfiguration with non-collocated link 3 connected). Regarding claim 9, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising, after the non-AP actor roams to an AP in the plurality of non-collocated AP actors, one of the AP actor or non-AP actor initiating a remove link procedure between the AP actor and the non-AP actor(P[0305], announce removal of affiliated APs corresponding to link 1 and link 2 by the AP MLD; multiple AP MLDs). Claims 11-17 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1-7 respectively. Claims 18-20 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1-3 respectively. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou et al. (hereinafter Zhou)(US 2025/0351179) in view of Fang et al. (hereinafter Fang)(US 2023/0147311) and Huang et al. (hereinafter Huang)(EP 4145947) and Asterjadhi et al. (hereinafter Asterjadhi)(US 2021/0007168). Regarding claim 10, Zhou in view of Fang and Huang teaches all the particulars of the claim except the method of claim 1, wherein the non-AP actor verifies the respective link metric values associated with the plurality of non-collocated AP actors while in a power save mode. However, Asterjadhi teaches in an analogous art wherein the non-AP actor verifies the respective link metric values associated with the plurality of non-collocated AP actors while in a power save mode(P[0137], non-AP MLD in a power save mode in such that STA interface to the auxiliary link). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the method wherein the non-AP actor verifies the respective link metric values associated with the plurality of non-collocated AP actors while in a power save mode in order to have improved efficiency. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot in view of new ground of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706662
ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT FOR MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701622
Connection Resume Request Method and Apparatus
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695820
SMARTPHONE CASE WITH REAR-FACING VIEWFINDER DISPLAY
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12634970
TECHNIQUES FOR CONFIGURING REFERENCE SIGNAL PATTERNS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
8y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634865
REPORTING MEASUREMENT DISTRIBUTION FOR POSITIONING
4y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 7m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month