Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/598,569

TWO-COMPONENT DEVELOPER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Priority
Mar 09, 2023 — JP 2023-036532
Examiner
SEILER, GRANT STEVEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
30%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
16 granted / 27 resolved
-0.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -29% lift
Without
With
+-29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 - 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sumioka (US PGP 2020/0174389) in view of Shimizu et al (WO 2023/281883) (machine translation of which is referred to henceforth). Sumioka teaches a toner which may be used as part of a two-component developer ([0019]). The toner particles include toner mother particles and externally added resin particles ([0020]). The externally added resin particles preferably have a number-average particle diameter of 60 – 140 nm, reading on the range stated in Claim 1. The externally added resin particles are preferably added in an amount of 0.2 – 1.0 parts by mass relative to 100 parts of toner mother particles, reading on the range stated in Claim 1. Sumioka teaches that the externally added resin particles are made of a crosslinked resin ([0069] - [0070]). Sumioka does not appear to teach a carrier having a coating layer which contains silicone resin. Shimizu teaches a two-component developer comprising a toner and a carrier ([0006]). The toner particles comprise toner particles and externally added resin particles, which contain a crosslinked resin. The carrier includes carrier particles, which comprise a carrier core and a coating layer ([0063]). Shimizu teaches that the coating layer comprises a coating resin and barium titanate particles ([0006]). The coating resin includes silicone resin, which allows for effective triboelectric charging of the toner ([0086]). In preparing a two-component developer comprising the toner taught by Sumioka, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to enhance the triboelectric charging of the toner by using the carrier taught by Shimizu. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to prepare a two-component developer in which the toner taught by Sumioka is paired with the carrier taught by Shimizu, resulting in a two-component developer described by Claim 1. Sumioka discloses a preparative example of the externally added crosslinked resin particles P2 ([0102]). These particles have a molar ratio of monomers used (styrene : methyl methacrylate : ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) of 12 : 28 : 1. This is the same monomer ratio as instant specific resin particles (a) (Specification, Table 1). Instant specific resin particles (a) also possess a “St rate” of 30% by mole. Therefore, Sumioka’s resin particles P2 have 30% by mole of the first repeating unit derived from styrene, reading on the range stated in Claim 2. As mentioned above, Sumioka’s crosslinked resin particles P2 are prepared from monomers of styrene, methyl methacrylate, and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, satisfying Claim 3. Sumioka’s crosslinked resin particles P2 have a cationic surfactant attached to the surface of the resin particle base, satisfying Claim 4 and Claim 5. As mentioned above, Shimizu’s carrier has a coating layer comprising barium titanate particles ([0085], [0088]), which are metal oxide particles. In addition, Shimizu teaches that the coating layer preferably also contains carbon black particles ([0085], [0092]), reading on Claim 6. As mentioned above, Sumioka’s externally added crosslinked resin particles P2 are essentially the same as instant specific resin particles (a). As also mentioned above, Sumioka teaches a preferred particle diameter and a preferred addition amount reading on the ranges presently claimed. According to the instant specification, the amount of contaminated resin particles is controlled by setting the number-average particle diameter and addition amount of the specific resin particles (page 24, lines 8 – 23). In addition, Sumioka gives a discussion of externally added resin particles detaching from the toner mother particles and contaminating the carrier particles ([0024]). Therefore, where Sumioka describes externally added crosslinked resin fine particles having a number-average diameter and addition amount in ranges overlapping the claimed ranges, the developer would necessarily possess an amount of contaminated resin particles lying in the range stated in Claim 7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Grant S Seiler whose telephone number is (571)272-3015. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 - 5:30 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT STEVEN SEILER/Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 07/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12663734
TONER
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656700
Toner, Toner Cartridge, and Image-Forming Device
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645162
TONER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631980
YELLOW TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12607950
TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
30%
With Interview (-29.2%)
3y 5m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month