Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/598,614

CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY FOR CONNECTION TO A VEHICLE ELECTRICAL GROUND

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Priority
Mar 07, 2023 — provisional 63/488,868
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1238 granted / 1432 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1461
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1432 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 1, Figs. 1A-6, claims 1-10 and 21-29 in the reply filed on 07/01/25 is acknowledged. Claims 4, 16 and 23-24 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, species 3 (at least one tab). Claims 8-9 and 13-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species. Claims 25-26 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, species 6 (conductive washer). Claims 28-29 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, species 2 (a plurality of openings). Specification [0026], lines 3-4, “the surface connector 16” should be changed –the surface connector 14--; [0026], line 4; and [0027], lines 2, “insulating cover” should be – insulating cover 16--; Claim Objections Claim 1, line 5, “points” should be --point--; Claim 2, line 2, “outer” should be deleted; Claim 24, line 1, “24” should be changed --21--; Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 27, “the wire connector is an arm extending away from the surface connector” are not described in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-7, 10-12, 15 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pettersson (4,023,882). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Pettersson discloses a connector assembly for providing electrical connection from an electrical device ground wire (7, Fig. 7) to a vehicle chassis ground (14, Fig. 8), the connector assembly comprising: a connection to the electrical device ground wire; and a surface connector configured to attach to a vehicle chassis, wherein the surface connector further comprises: an insulating cover (19, Fig. 7); and at least one conductive contact point (one of 17, Fig. 7) within the insulating cover configured to selectively protrude through the insulating cover and make contact with the vehicle chassis when the connector assembly is secured to the vehicle chassis (Fig. 8). Regarding claim 2, Fig. 8 shows the at least one conductive contact point of the surface connector is configured to pierce the insulating cover and contact the vehicle chassis while remaining sealed from the surroundings when the surface connector is secured to the vehicle chassis. Regarding claims 3 and 15, Fig. 8 shows the at least one conductive contact point of the surface connector is geometrically configured to prevent damage to the connector assembly during installation of the connector assembly to the vehicle chassis. Regarding claim 5, Fig. 8 shows the insulating cover (19) substantially covers the surface connector and configured to protect the surrounding area of the at least one of conductive contact point (one of 17) when the surface connector is secured to the vehicle chassis. Regarding claim 6, the insulating cover comprises a material (sealing element) that resists oxidation and corrosion. Regarding claim 7, Fig. 8 shows the surface connector is configured to receive a fastener (8) to secure the connector assembly to the vehicle chassis. Regarding claim 10, Fig. 8 shows the connection to the electrical device ground wire comprises a wire connector coupled to the surface connector configured to receive the electrical device ground wire or cable. Regarding claim 12, Fig. 8 shows the insulating cover is configured to protect the connection to the electrical device ground wire. Regarding claim 21, Fig. 11 shows a connector assembly for providing electrical connection from an electrical device ground wire to a vehicle chassis ground, the connector assembly comprising: a conductive body comprising a wire connector (7) and a surface connector (15’’), wherein the surface connector comprises an upper surface (20) and a lower surface (16) with an aperture (not labeled) between the upper and lower surface to define an interior socket and at least one pin (17) extending away from the lower surface to form a protruding attachment point, wherein the at least one pin includes a distal end having a sharpened edge or point; and an insulating cover (19 and 19’) disposed about the surface connector of the conductive body, the insulating cover encasing the at least one pin such that the distal end of the at least one pin does not extend beyond the insulating cover, and partially covering the upper and lower surfaces of the surface connector, the insulating cover spaced radially apart from the aperture in the upper surface of the surface connector so that a portion of the upper surface about the aperture is uncovered. Regarding claim 27, Fig. 11 shows the wire connector is an arm extending away from the surface connector and integrally formed therewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 22 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pettersson in view of Kindell (3,588,787). Regarding claim 22, Pettersson discloses the claimed invention as described above except for at least three pins extending away from the lower surface of the at least three pins forming a protruding attachment point, wherein the at least three pins each include a distal end having a sharp point. Kindell, Figs. 8 and 9 show a metal annulus (41) having three pins (43) extending away from the lower surface of the at least three pins forming a protruding attachment point, wherein the at least three pins each include a distal end (49) having a sharp point. It would have been obvious to modify Pettersson to have three pins extending away from the lower surface of the at least three pins forming a protruding attachment point, wherein the at least three pins each include a distal end having a sharp point, as taught by Kindell for better connection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 07/29/26. thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695259
FRICTION WELDING CONNECTOR AND ITS METHOD OF PRODUCTION
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12665367
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665350
Electromagnetic Electrical Connector System
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658641
Lever and Header Gear Tooth Engagement to Prevent Premature Connector Mating
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658643
FIRST CONNECTOR AND CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH UNLOCKING SLIDER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1432 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month