Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/598,675

BRINE-REINFORCED GEOPOLYMER COMPOSITION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Examiner
GREEN, ANTHONY J
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Khalifa University of Science and Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1391 granted / 1636 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1677
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 21 July 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a non-elected invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 7 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Verma et al “Utilization of Brine Sludge and Fly Ash Waste as Complementary Resources, for Making Non-toxic, Geopolymeric (Cement-Free) Materials”. The reference teaches, in the abstract, and Section 2 Materials and Methods, the use of brine sludge and fly ash to produce geopolymer paver blocks and bricks. See especially Section 2.2 – 2.4 of the reference. The instant claims are met by the reference. As for claim 1, as the reference teaches the use of a brine sludge to produce a molded geopolymer composition it is seen to meet the claimed limitations. That is, the resulting molded brick or paver block would have some brine embedded within the geopolymer framework absent evidence showing otherwise. As for claim 2, the fly ash meets the silicon aluminum raw material and the sodium hydroxide and sodium metasilicate meets the activator solution (section 2.1.2 – 2.1.4). As for claim 7, the reference teaches sodium hydroxide and sodium metasilicate (sodium silicate). As for claim 11, the reference teaches bricks and paver blocks. As for claim 12, the reference teaches a brick which can be considered to be a decorative item. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by China Patent Specification No. CN 113003988 A. The reference teaches, in the abstract, and the examples, the formation of a geopolymer using sea water. The composition is injected into an artificial fish reef mould and removed to from an ecological artificial fish reef. The instant claims are met by the reference. As for claim 1, the reference teaches the use of a sea water to produce a molded geopolymer composition it is seen to meet the claimed limitations. That is, the resulting molded reef would have some sea water embedded within the geopolymer framework absent evidence showing otherwise. As for claim 2, the fly ash and slag meets the silicon aluminum raw material and the and the MgO and NaOH (see embodiments) meets the activator solution. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6 and 8-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY J GREEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1367. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 6:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber R. Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY J GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731 ajg August 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767599
SULFATE-POOR CALCIUM-CONTAINING POROUS MINERAL MATERIALS
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768828
COMPOSITION FOR IDENTIFYING THE ORIGIN OF SCALE, PROCESS FOR PREPARING SAID COMPOSITION AND PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING THE ORIGIN OF SCALE USING SAID COMPOSITION
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767874
USE OF A CALCIUM CARBONATE OF HIGH PURITY AND HAVING A HIGH SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA IN AN INORGANIC MORTAR SYSTEM BASED ON ALUMINOUS CEMENT TO INCREASE LOAD VALUES
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753115
LOW-COST FOUR-ELEMENT SYSTEM CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747380
GRANULATED PARTICLE FOR COLD STORAGE MATERIAL PARTICLE, COLD STORAGE MATERIAL PARTICLE, COLD STORAGE DEVICE, REFRIGERATOR, CRYOPUMP, SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET, NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING APPARATUS, NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE APPARATUS, MAGNETIC FIELD APPLICATION TYPE SINGLE CRYSTAL PULLING APPARATUS, AND HELIUM RE-CONDENSING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.4%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month