Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/599,302

DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Mar 08, 2024
Examiner
LIN, KATHERINE Y
Art Unit
2113
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Hitachi, LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
320 granted / 351 resolved
+36.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
382
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 351 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Informalities The Specification is objected to because of the following informalities: In abstract and par 7, “error detection unit" should be “error detection circuit.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim(s) 6 is/are objected to because of the following informalities: “error detection unit" should be “error detection circuit.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the Spec in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 6 recites a "correction circuit.” However, the Spec is silent on this subject. Particularly, the Spec does not describe it in par 36, 42. Response to Remarks An interview was requested by applicant on 12-27. Examiner left a voicemail on 12-29 and didn’t hear back as of 1-2-2026. Applicant’s argument has been fully considered and is persuasive. Therefore the rejection under 35 USC 101 has been withdrawn. The amendments overcome the rejection under 102. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHERINE LIN whose telephone number is (571)431-0706. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday; 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bryce Bonzo can be reached at (571) 272-3655. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERINE LIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2113
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jan 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596953
QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION USING NEURAL NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591476
EMPTY PAGE DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585556
ACTIVE COMPONENT DRIVEN COMPUTATIONAL SERVER RELIABILITY AND FAILURE PREVENTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585530
SINGLE SIGNAL DEBUG PORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585560
REFINING PARAMETER SETTINGS FOR COPY SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 351 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month