Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/599,362

ELECTRODE CATALYST FOR FUEL CELL AND SOLID POLYMER FUEL CELL INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 08, 2024
Priority
Mar 09, 2023 — JP 2023-036704
Examiner
SLIFKA, SARAH A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
535 granted / 709 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
722
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 709 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsumoto et al (EP3082184). Regarding claim 1, Matsumoto teaches a metal-catalyst-particle-supporting carbon material for use as a carrier for a solid polymer fuel cell catalyst, The metal catalyst is taught to be (0027). The carbon material is taught to have a BET specific surface area of 600-1500 m2/g. The relative intensity ratio (ID/IG), equivalent to the claimed R-value, is taught to be 1.0-2.0 with the peak intensity ID known as the D-band being in the range of 1200-1400 cm-1 and the peak intensity IG, known as the G-band, being in the range of 1500-1700 cm-1, obtained from the Raman spectrum (abstract). Matsumoto further teaches that inside the catalyst layer, it is important that pores form in the clearances of the component materials for forming diffusion paths for oxidizing gas and reducing gas (0005). Matsumoto does not explicitly teach the carbon carrier including a micropore area, as claimed. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to recognize that as the electrode of Matsumoto is materially the same, an ordinarily skilled artisan would have expected micropores with a similar micropore area, given the importance of the pores in order to form diffusion paths for oxidizing gas and reducing gas, as taught by Matsumoto. Regarding claim 2, Matsumoto teaches the material to be used in a solid polymer fuel cell including an MEA having an electrolyte sandwiched between an anode catalyst layer and a cathode catalyst layer (0001-0002) including the catalyst as discussed above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH A SLIFKA whose telephone number is (571)270-5838. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH A. SLIFKA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759 August 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749732
CONFIGURING BATTERY PACKS FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749674
ELECTRODE AND ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749742
BATTERY SHELL ASSEMBLY AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12719046
Positive Electrode Including Positive Electrode Additive for Lithium Secondary Battery
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719088
Biphasic electrolyte solution comprising kosmotropic metal salt
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.2%)
3y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 709 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month