Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/599,985

RETRACTABLE BUMPER ASSEMBLY WITH LOCK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 08, 2024
Examiner
CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
25 granted / 30 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
66
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 30 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This action is in reply to the Applicant’s claims, filed on 06/23/2026. Claims 1, and 11-20 have been amended. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. Response to Amendment The amendment filed 06/23/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-20 remain pending in the application. Applicant's amendments to claim 16 has overcome the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejection previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action filed 03/23/2026. Applicant’s claim of Farooq et al. (US12208758) being commonly owned has been considered and found persuasive; therefore, the rejections and objections have been withdrawn from the Non-Final Office Action dated 03/23/2026 and a Second Non-Final Office Action issued as below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-13, and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Faruque (US8113555). Claim 1. Faruque discloses: A vehicle-bumper assembly comprising: a bumper (235 bumper, Fig. 5); a rod (245 bolt, Fig. 5) fixed relative to the bumper and elongated along an axis (Fig. 5); a bracket (295 bracket , Fig. 5) spaced from the bumper along the axis of the rod (Fig. 5), the rod being movably engaged with the bracket (as illustrated in another embodiment 190 bolt is movably engaged with 220 plate as illustrated in Fig. 3-4) between a design position (as illustrated in another embodiment detached position; Fig. 4b) and a retracted position (compressed position; Fig. 6a); a spring (255 spring; Fig. 5) between the bumper and the bracket (Fig. 5), the spring resiliently forcing the bumper away from the bracket along the axis of the rod toward the design position (as illustrated in another embodiment, Fig. 4a-4b). a keeper (305 locking pin, Fig. 6A) releasably engaged with the bracket (305 is releasably engaged or connected with 295 bracket, Fig. 6A), the keeper maintaining the rod in position when the keeper is engaged with the bracket (305 controls the axial distance between 235 bumper and 295 when 305 is engaged or coupled with 295; Fig. 6A); and a lock (lock comprises of 315 hydraulic actuator and 325 hydraulic line, Fig. 6A) movable between a locked position (Fig. 6A) in which the lock couples the keeper and the bracket and an unlocked position (Fig. 6B) in which the lock is decoupled from the keeper and the bracket, or both the keeper and the bracket. Claim 2. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly of claim 1, further comprising a releasable connection between the keeper and bracket (265 hole engages with 305 between 305 and 295, Fig. 6a-b). Claim 3. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 2, wherein the releasable connection is designed to release the keeper from the bracket in response to certain frontal-vehicle impacts (sensors used to detect imminent crashing events…trigger deployment of impact mitigation system; Col. 2, line 62-Col. 3, line 2). Claim 5. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 1, wherein the rod extends through the bracket and the bracket is between the keeper and the bumper (Fig. 5-6). Claim 6. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 5, wherein the keeper is disposed on the axis of the rod (Faruque: Fig. 5-6). Claim 7. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 6, wherein the lock includes an actuator (315 hydraulic actuator, Fig. 6) and a latch (coupling element between 315 and 305; Fig. 6) movable by the actuator. Claim 8. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 7, wherein the latch is movable by the actuator between the locked position in which the keeper is between the latch and the bracket and the unlocked position in which the latch is disengaged with the keeper (305 is axially between the coupling element and 295 as illustrated in Fig. 6a-b in the locked and unlocked position). Claim 9. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 7, wherein the actuator is on the keeper (15 is integral to 305, Fig. 6). Claim 10. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 1, wherein the spring is on the rod (Fig. 5-6). Claim 11. Faruque discloses: A vehicle comprising: a vehicle frame (110 side rail Fig. 1) a bumper (235 bumper, Fig. 5); a rod (245 bolt, Fig. 5) fixed relative to the bumper and elongated along an axis (Fig. 5); a bracket (295 bracket , Fig. 5) spaced from the bumper along the axis of the rod (Fig. 5), the rod being movably engaged with the bracket (as illustrated in another embodiment 190 bolt is movably engaged with 220 plate as illustrated in Fig. 3-4) between a design position (as illustrated in another embodiment detached position; Fig. 4b) and a retracted position (compressed position; Fig. 6a); a spring (255 spring; Fig. 5) between the bumper and the bracket (Fig. 5), the spring resiliently forcing the bumper away from the bracket along the axis of the rod toward the design position (as illustrated in another embodiment, Fig. 4a-4b). a keeper (305 locking pin, Fig. 6A) releasably engaged with the bracket (305 is releasably engaged or connected with 295 bracket, Fig. 6A), the keeper maintaining the rod in position when the keeper is engaged with the bracket (305 controls the axial distance between 235 bumper and 295 when 305 is engaged or coupled with 295; Fig. 6A); and a lock (lock comprises of 315 hydraulic actuator and 325 hydraulic line, Fig. 6A) movable between a locked position (Fig. 6A) in which the lock couples the keeper and the bracket and an unlocked position (Fig. 6B) in which the lock is decoupled from the keeper and the bracket, or both the keeper and the bracket. Claim 12. Faruque discloses: The vehicle of claim 11, further comprising a releasable connection between the keeper and bracket (see previously rejected claim 2). Claim 13. Faruque discloses: The vehicle as set forth in claim 12, wherein the releasable connection is designed to release the keeper from the bracket in response to certain frontal-vehicle impacts (see previously rejected claim 3). Claim 15. Faruque discloses: The vehicle as set forth in claim 11, wherein the rod extends through the bracket and the keeper is on a vehicle-rearward side of the bracket (305 is on rearward side of 295, Fig. 6). Claim 16. Faruque discloses: The vehicle as set forth in claim 15, wherein the keeper is vehicle-rearward of the rod (305 is vehicle reward of 245, Fig. 6). Claim 17. Farooq in view of Faruque teaches: The vehicle as set forth in claim 16, wherein the lock includes an actuator and a latch movable by the actuator (see previously rejected claim 7). Claim 18. The vehicle- as set forth in claim 17, wherein the latch is movable by the actuator between the locked position vehicle-rearward of the keeper and the unlocked position in which the latch is offset cross-vehicle from the keeper (coupling element between 315 and 305 is vehicle-rearward of 305 and when unlocked, is offset cross-vehicle from 305, Fig. 6b). Claim 19. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 17, wherein the actuator is on the keeper (see previously rejected claim 9). Claim 20. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 1, wherein the spring is on the rod (see previously rejected claim 10). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faruque (US8,113,555) in view of Fichtinger et al. (US10,875,480). Claim 4. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 1. Faruque does not disclose: a shear pin between the keeper and the bracket. Fichtinger discloses a bumper system comprising of a spring and a shear bolt wherein the bolt shears in the event of a collision and allows the spring to compress and retract the bumper. Fichtinger teaches: a shear pin (50 shear bolt, Fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the bumper assembly of Faruque by including a shear bolt between the keeper and bracket as taught by Fichtinger with a reasonable expectation of success in order to hold the bumper in the collapsed position until a collision event as taught by Fichtinger (Col. 5, lines 25-43). Claim 14. Faruque discloses: The vehicle-bumper assembly as set forth in claim 11. Faruque does not disclose: a shear pin between the keeper and the bracket. Fichtinger further teaches: a shear pin (50 shear bolt, Fig. 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daniel Craig whose telephone number is (571)270-0747. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thurs 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at (571)270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL T CRAIG/Examiner, Art Unit 3676 /TARA SCHIMPF/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 23, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735960
REAR-MOUNTED DOUBLE-CHANNEL ABRASIVE JET CUTTING DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723478
DRILLING FLUID CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12680402
Composite Hollow Profiles For Downhole
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669269
Systems for Generating Energy from Geothermal Sources and Methods of Operating and Constructing Same
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662914
PERFORATING TOOL WITH A HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED ASSEMBLY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 30 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month