Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/600,494

METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING PANORAMIC VIDEOS, TERMINAL AND SERVER

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Mar 08, 2024
Priority
Dec 13, 2016 — CN 201611149103.X +2 more
Examiner
WERNER, DAVID N
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
489 granted / 720 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
758
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
71.8%
+31.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 720 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION This Office action for U.S. Patent Application No. 18/600,494 is responsive to communications filed 13 March 2026 and the Interview of 29 April 2026, in reply to the 10 June 2025 Non-Final Rejection and the 15 January 2026 Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment. Claims 1, 3–5, 7–14, and 16–18 are pending. In the Non-Final Rejection, claims 1 and 12 were objected to for various informalities. Claims 6, 7, and 19 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) as indefinite. Claim 2 was rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(d) as redundant with parent claim 1. Claims 1–11 and 14–18 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over CN 105916060 A (“Jia”) in view of WO 2015/014773 A1 (“van Brandenburg”) and in view of CN 105976424 A (“Hu”). Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendments to the claims have been considered. The objections to claims 1 and 12 are withdrawn. The rejections of claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 112(d) and claims 6 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) are moot. The rejection of claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) is withdrawn. However, as discussed in the interview, claims 1, 12, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b). Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1, 12, and 14 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Each of claims 1, 12, and 14 recites a media presentation description stored in the server that includes “a correspondence between a viewing angle of a user and a [panoramic] video file”. This exists before the user requests the panoramic video file. As discussed in the interview, it is unclear whether this viewing angle is the user’s actual first viewing angle that would be expected to be received when playback starts, or whether this is a default viewing angle. Various proposed amendments were discussed in the interview, but the claims must be handled as presented. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 12, and 14 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) set forth in this Office action. Claims 3–5, 7–11, 13, and 16–18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The specific combination of the four FOV types as FOV options within a media presentation description in a panoramic video file is found allowable. Closest art Jia may incidentally produce the FOVs listed, but they are not presented as four FOV types within a server-stored media presentation description. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2016/0026253 A1 US 2020/0045286 A1 US 2019/0287289 A1 US 2019/0289284 A1 US 2019/0227695 A1 US 2018/0122129 A1 US 2017/0237971 A1 US 2016/0255327 A1 US 2016/0227203 A1 US 2013/0307935 A1 US 2013/0271575 A1 The following prior art was found using an Artificial Intelligence assisted search using an internal AI tool that uses the classification of the application under the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system, as well as from the specification, including the claims and abstract, of the application as contextual information. The documents are ranked from most to least relevant. Where possible, English-language equivalents are given, and redundant results within the same patent families are eliminated. See “New Artificial Intelligence Functionality in PE2E Search”, 1504 OG 359 (15 November 2022), “Automated Search Pilot Program”, 90 F.R. 48,161 (8 October 2025). CN 107277081 A US 2011/0090056 A1 US 2010/0229210 A1 CN 105100839 A US 2009/0328124 A1 Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See M.P.E.P. § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David N Werner whose telephone number is (571)272-9662. The examiner can normally be reached M--F 7:30--4:00 Central. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dave Czekaj can be reached at 571.272.7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David N Werner/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 29, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677075
SOLID-STATE IMAGING APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS, AND DISTANCE-MEASURING IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666155
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659606
SELECTIVE READING IN COLOUR FILTER ARRAYS HAVING SMALLEST REPEATING UNITS WITH DIFFERENT SUB-UNITS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644608
COOKING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12634456
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR HIGH-LEVEL IMAGE SEGMENTATION AND IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 720 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month