Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/600,745

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, CONTROLLER, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 10, 2024
Priority
Sep 14, 2021 — JP 2021-149226 +2 more
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Softbank Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
379 granted / 455 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
490
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 455 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I: Claims 1-33, 35 and 36, drawn to a communication system comprising a controller and a SR gateway which includes a notification unit and a router is acknowledged. Claims 1-33, 35 and 36 are subject to examination and rejected. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Objections Claims 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 13, 22, 30-33, 35 and 36 are objected to because of the following informalities: The recited ACRONYMS such as SR, SRv6, IP, GTP-U, gNB, NLRI, SID, BGP, UE, SMF, EP, RD, VRF, TEID, QFI, RQI, VPNv4, VPNv6, GTP4.E, GTP6.E, ADRDB, PE and UPF must be defined within the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 30, 32 and 33 recite the limitations " … received from an IP network into …” and “… a router connected to an IP network, …”, “… in NLRI and an SID of …” and “… and a SID of the SR gateway, …”, “… including an IP prefix including …” and “… stores an IP prefix including …”. There are two of ‘an IP network’, ‘an SID’, and ‘an IP prefix’ within the claims and if these terms ‘an IP network’, ‘an SID’, and ‘an IP prefix’ refers to the same feature, the later ‘an IP network’, ‘an SID’, and ‘an IP prefix’ should be treated to show antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 1, 30, 32 and 33 recite the limitations "… in association with each other, and …”. It is not clear what the term ‘each other’ indicates within the claims. The term "each other" renders the claims indefinite because the claims include elements not actually disclosed, thereby rendering the scope of the claims unascertainable. Appropriate action is required. Claims 1, 30, 32 and 33 recite the limitations "… and when a match is found…”. The proper use of the term ‘a match’ is for matching A to B. However, the sole use of the term ‘a match’ without specifying ‘A to B’ may fall the scope of the claims unclear and indefinite. Appropriate action is required. Claim 31 recites the limitations ‘the gNB’, ‘the TEID’, ‘the QFI’, ‘the RQI’, ‘the UE’, ‘the SID’, ‘the IP prefix’. There are insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. The terms ‘the gNB’, ‘the TEID’, ‘the QFI’, ‘the RQI’, ‘the UE’, ‘the SID’, ‘the IP prefix’ do not have proper antecedent basis in the referenced claim 31. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-33, 35 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Akhavain Mohammadi (US PGPub 2020/0128469). Regarding claims 1, 30, 32 and 33, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches a communication system (Akhavain Mohammadi, see abstract, Apparatus and methods are taught for utilizing Segment Routing (SR) in a user plane for a wireless network which utilizes a control plane configured for GPT) comprising: a controller (Akhavain Mohammadi, see figure 6, the controller is in the control plane); and an SR gateway which converts an SRv6-compliant packet received from an IP network into a GTP-U-compliant packet (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0045, as illustrated at step 510 the SR module 430 of gNB 410 receives the CP information from GTP processing module 420 and associates the SID-G (i.e. the SID of gNB 410 for incoming SR packets) and SID-A1 (the SID of UPF-A for outgoing packets sent from the gNB 410 to the UPF-A 440) to a set of functions of the SR module which can be used to convert between the SID and the corresponding GTP tunnel. This can include, in one example, an association between the SID-A1 (which the SR module uses when transmitting an SR packet from the gNB to the UPF-A) and GTP tunnel (e.g. the local addresses (SA of gNB 410, DA of port 1 of UPF-A) and TEID 2000)), wherein the SR gateway includes a notification unit which notifies the controller, and a router connected to an IP network, of a route including an IP prefix including an address of a reachable gNB in NLRI and an SID of the SR gateway in a BGP attribute (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0047, Step 620 illustrates SID distribution between the SR module 490 of UPF-B 470 and the SR module 460 of UPF A 440 via a method for distributing routing information, such as IGP, via an SDN controller, etc), and the controller includes a storage unit which stores an IP prefix including the address of the gNB, and a SID of the SR gateway, in association with each other (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0045, at step 510 the SR module 430 of gNB 410 receives the CP information from GTP processing module 420 and associates the SID-G (i.e. the SID of gNB 410 for incoming SR packets) and SID-A1 (the SID of UPF-A for outgoing packets sent from the gNB 410 to the UPF-A 440) to a set of functions of the SR module which can be used to convert between the SID and the corresponding GTP tunnel), and an advertisement unit which searches the storage unit by using, as a key, an address of a gNB included in a UE session information in SMF notified when UE is attached, and when a match is found, advertises route information of the UE to the router (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 2, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the advertisement unit advertises route information of the UE to the SR gateway (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 3, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the notification unit notifies the controller and the router the route including the address of the reachable gNB in an EP of the NLRI, and the SID of the SR gateway (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0047, Step 620 illustrates SID distribution between the SR module 490 of UPF-B 470 and the SR module 460 of UPF A 440 via a method for distributing routing information, such as IGP, via an SDN controller, etc). Regarding claim 4, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the NLRI in the route includes RD of a VRF which is configured to import the route information of the UE in the SR gateway (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0047, Step 620 illustrates SID distribution between the SR module 490 of UPF-B 470 and the SR module 460 of UPF A 440 via a method for distributing routing information, such as IGP, via an SDN controller, etc). Regarding claim 5, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the SID in the route indicates the VRF configured to import the UE route information in the SR gateway (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 6, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the advertisement unit adds a community attribute to be imported by the router to route information of the UE and advertises the route information to the router, in order for the router to receive the route information of the UE and register a route destined for the UE in a routing table of the router (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 7, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the advertisement unit adds, to the route information of the UE, the different community attribute for each core network instance included in the UE session information (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0047, Step 620 illustrates SID distribution between the SR module 490 of UPF-B 470 and the SR module 460 of UPF A 440 via a method for distributing routing information, such as IGP, via an SDN controller, etc). Regarding claim 8, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the advertisement unit adds, to the route information of the UE, the different community attribute for each group of the gNB included in the UE session information (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0047, Step 620 illustrates SID distribution between the SR module 490 of UPF-B 470 and the SR module 460 of UPF A 440 via a method for distributing routing information, such as IGP, via an SDN controller, etc). Regarding claim 9, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the advertisement unit stores, as the route information of the UE, at least one of an IP prefix including an address of the UE, an IP address of the gNB, a TEID, and a QFI and an RQI, which are included in the UE session information, in at least one of NLRI or Nexthop-Address in an MP_REACH_NLRI attribute (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 10, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein when the NLRI is VPNv4 Unicast or VPNv6 Unicast address family, the advertisement unit stores, as the route information of the UE, an IP prefix including UE IP address in NLRI in an MP_REACH_NLRI attribute (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 11, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein when the NLRI is VPNv4 Unicast or VPNv6 Unicast address family, the advertisement unit stores the TEID of 4 bytes, the QFI and the RQI of 1 byte, 0 of 3 bytes in order, or stores 0 of 3 bytes, the TEID of 4 bytes, and the QFI and the RQI of 1 byte in order in a leading 8-byte long RD portion in the Nexthop-Address, stores an IP address of the gNB in an IP address portion of the Nexthop-Address, and does not store the TEID, and the QFI and the RQI in the NLRI (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 12, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein when an effective bit length of the TEID is 16 bits or less and when the NLRI is VPNv4 Unicast or VPNv6 Unicast address family, the advertisement unit stores a QFI and an RQI of 1 byte and the TEID of 2 bytes in a 24-bit length label portion of the NLRI, fills an entire RD portion of the Nexthop-Address with 0, and stores an IP address of the gNB in an IP address portion of the Nexthop-Address (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 13, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the advertisement unit stores, in a Prefix-SID attribute, an SID value in which an IP address of the gNB, a QFI and an RQI, and a TEID, which are included in the UE session information, are written in advance, as GTP4.E or GTP6.E in an Argument portion subsequent to a Locator and a Function portion of an SID corresponding to a conversion unit of the SR gateway, and stores an IP prefix including an address of the UE and an IP address of the gNB, which are included in the UE session information, in NLRI in an MP_REACH_NLRI attribute (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 14, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the router writes at least one of the gNB address, the TEID, the QFI, and the RQI, which are stored in route information of the UE received from the controller, in an Argument portion of the SID stored in the route information, and updates the SID to be used for packet transfer to the IP prefix of the UE (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 15, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the notification unit notifies the controller of the route including slice identification information, which allows identification of a slice corresponding to the UE, in a color attribute (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0057, such an SR configured user plane can be used for network slices, such as slices for machine type communication (MTC). For example, SR data plane can be applied to a specific slice in 5G networks (e.g. a slice which supports MTC). In other words, there can be 5G slices that will keep using GTP data plane, while there are other slices that will use an SR user plane). Regarding claim 16, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches further comprising the router, wherein when the route including an address of the gNB disappears, the router autonomously deletes a route of the UE without waiting for advertisement of route deletion from the controller (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network. AMF 210 communicates with SMF 220 via network interface N11. AMF 210 communicates with UE 230 via network interface N1. AMF 210 communicates with gNB 240 via network interface N2. SMF 220 communicates with UPF-A 250 and UPF-B 260 via network interface N4). Regarding claim 17, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein when the route including an address of the gNB disappears, the notification unit autonomously advertises a route deletion of the UE without deletion of the UE session information in SMF (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network. AMF 210 communicates with SMF 220 via network interface N11. AMF 210 communicates with UE 230 via network interface N1. AMF 210 communicates with gNB 240 via network interface N2. SMF 220 communicates with UPF-A 250 and UPF-B 260 via network interface N4). Regarding claim 18, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the router autonomously deletes all UE routes, which are held by the route having disappeared, other than the route of the UE without waiting for advertisement of route deletion from the controller (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network. AMF 210 communicates with SMF 220 via network interface N11. AMF 210 communicates with UE 230 via network interface N1. AMF 210 communicates with gNB 240 via network interface N2. SMF 220 communicates with UPF-A 250 and UPF-B 260 via network interface N4). Regarding claim 19, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the notification unit autonomously advertises route deletions of all UE routes, which are held by the route having disappeared, other than the route of the UE without deletion of the UE session information in SMF (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network. AMF 210 communicates with SMF 220 via network interface N11. AMF 210 communicates with UE 230 via network interface N1. AMF 210 communicates with gNB 240 via network interface N2. SMF 220 communicates with UPF-A 250 and UPF-B 260 via network interface N4). Regarding claim 20, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches further comprising the router, wherein in at least one of a case where the route including an address of the gNB disappears or a case where it is determined that a route advertised by an SR gateway other than the SR gateway is optimal as a route of route information of the UE, the router autonomously links an SID addressed to the UE by an SID of an optimal route without waiting for advertisement of UE route update of the UE from the controller (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 21, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the notification unit in at least one of a case where the route including an address of the gNB disappears or a case where it is determined that a route advertised by an SR gateway other than the SR gateway is optimal as a route of route information of the UE, the notification unit autonomously links an SID addressed to the UE by an SID of an optimal route without waiting deletion, or update of the UE session information in SMF (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0028, FIG. 2 also illustrates a UP established between UE 230 and Data Network (DN) 270. The UP includes gNB 240, UPF-A 250, and UPF-B 260. The SMF 220 establishes a Packet Data Unit (PDU) session through the mobile core network between the gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 for a data session between the UE 230 and DN 270. Accordingly gNB 240 and the UPF-B 260 are the end points for such PDU session within the core network). Regarding claim 22, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches further comprising the router, wherein the router includes an ADRDB, which is a routing table, for searching for a route received from the SR gateway (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 23, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the controller includes a storage, which is a routing table, for searching for a route received from the SR gateway (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 24, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the ADRDB is a global routing table of the router (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 25, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the storage is a global routing table of the controller (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 26, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the ADRDB is a VRF which imports the route by a value of a community attribute added to the route (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 27, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the storage is a VRF which imports the route by a value of a community attribute added to the route (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 28, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the router evaluates a value of a community attribute added to the route on a basis of a different community attribute for each group of gNB, which is registered in advance, and imports the route to the ADRDB (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 29, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein the controller evaluates a value of a community attribute added to the route on a basis of a different community attribute for each group of gNB, which is registered in advance, and imports the route to the storage (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Regarding claim 31, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches a router (Akhavain Mohammadi, see abstract, Apparatus and methods are taught for utilizing Segment Routing (SR) in a user plane for a wireless network which utilizes a control plane configured for GPT) comprising: a functionality which writes at least one of the gNB address, the TEID, the QFI, and the RQI, which are stored in route information of the UE received from a controller, in an Argument portion of the SID stored in the route information, and updates the SID to be used for packet transfer to the IP prefix of the UE (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0044, GTP information 405, includes Local TEID=1000, Peer Address=UPF-A1 (e.g., port 1 of the UPF A), Peer TEID=2000, etc., for a GTP tunnel between the gNB 410 and UPF-A 440. This information is stored in the GTP processing module 420. GTP information 435, includes Local TEID=2000, Peer Address=gNB, Peer TEID=1000, etc., for a GTP tunnel between UPF-A 440 and the gNB 410. This information is stored in the GTP processing module 450. GTP information 445, includes Local TEID=3000, Peer Address=UPF-B, Peer TEID=4000, etc.). Regarding claim 35, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches comprising a PE router, wherein the PE router imports, as a route of a prefix including a UE, an SID of a VRF corresponding to the UPF which serving the UE, and when receiving notification of arrival of a packet addressed to the UE, transfers, to the UPF, the packet addressed to the UE (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0045, as illustrated at step 510 the SR module 430 of gNB 410 receives the CP information from GTP processing module 420 and associates the SID-G (i.e. the SID of gNB 410 for incoming SR packets) and SID-A1 (the SID of UPF-A for outgoing packets sent from the gNB 410 to the UPF-A 440) to a set of functions of the SR module which can be used to convert between the SID and the corresponding GTP tunnel. This can include, in one example, an association between the SID-A1 (which the SR module uses when transmitting an SR packet from the gNB to the UPF-A) and GTP tunnel (e.g. the local addresses (SA of gNB 410, DA of port 1 of UPF-A) and TEID 2000)). Regarding claim 36, Akhavain Mohammadi teaches wherein when the UE transitions to an idle state, the PE router switches transfer of a packet addressed to the UE from transfer by longest match to transfer by short prefix route (Akhavain Mohammadi, see paragraph 0041, the SID may be a number that can be treated as an index to a table which stores the corresponding GTP information, or it may act as a pointer to a memory location in the UPF that stores the GTP information). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771608
NETWORK SLICING BASED ON SERVICE TYPE
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772237
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770632
TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, TRANSMISSION METHOD, RECEPTION APPARATUS AND RECEPTION METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING A PLURALITY OF TYPES OF AUDIO DATA ITEMS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764596
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEAMLESSLY PROVIDING QUALITY OF SERVICE CONTINUITY IN A WIRELESS NETWORK
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750914
COMMUNICATION METHOD OF COMMUNICATION TERMINAL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR COMMUNICATING SERVICE DATA OF AN APPLICATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 455 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month