Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/601,013

COMPARATOR CIRCUIT AND VOLTAGE TEST CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 11, 2024
Priority
Mar 13, 2023 — JP 2023-038909
Examiner
POTHEN, FEBA
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohm Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
511 granted / 630 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
666
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
89.2%
+49.2% vs TC avg
§102
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/11/24 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoshinaga et al., CN 109557842 Regarding claim 1, Yoshinaga discloses a comparator circuit comprising: an amplifier including an auto zero operational amplifier(Fig. 2-3; auto zero amplifier circuit 12c) and amplifying a difference between an input voltage and a predetermined first voltage(fig. 3; input voltage difference between positive and negative terminal); and a first voltage comparator comparing an output voltage of the amplifier with a predetermined second voltage (fig. 2-3; comparator 12d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2, 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshinaga et al., CN 109557842 in view of Kasireddy et al., US 11811244 Regarding claim 2, Yoshinaga is silent in further comprising: a second voltage comparator comparing the output voltage of the amplifier with a predetermined third voltage, wherein the comparator circuit operates as a window comparator. Kasireddy teaches a second voltage comparator comparing the output voltage of the amplifier with a predetermined third voltage, wherein the comparator circuit operates as a window comparator (Col. 17 lines 3-6; comparator circuit 74 with first and second comparators with voltages Vsup, Vslo). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Kasireddy into Yoshinaga for the benefit of providing upper and lower limits for the signal detecting circuit. Regarding claim 5, Yoshinaga teaches the comparator circuit according to claim 2; and a variable voltage source generating the first voltage having a voltage level corresponding to an expected value of the input voltage (Fig. 3; sw1 changes voltage level at non-inverting terminal of OP2 therefore is variable). Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshinaga et al., CN 109557842 in view of Pan et al., CN 216051910 Regarding claim 3, Yoshinaga is silent wherein the first voltage comparator and the second voltage comparator have an output stage of an open collector or an open drain, and outputs of the first voltage comparator and the second voltage comparator are pulled up by a common resistance. Pan teaches wherein a first voltage comparator and a second voltage comparator have an output stage of an open collector or an open drain, and outputs of the first voltage comparator and the second voltage comparator are pulled up by a common resistance (Fig. 7; comparator 107, 108, resistors R3, R4 and switch K1, K2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Pan into Yoshinaga for the benefit of providing a circuit for measuring current in the input with accuracy. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshinaga et al., CN 109557842 in view of Jiang et al., US 20130038388 Regarding claim 4, Yoshinaga is silent in wherein the amplifier is a subtraction circuit. Jiang teaches wherein the amplifier is a subtraction circuit (¶[0004]; Fig. 1; auto zero amp 150 subtracts signals). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Jiang into Yoshinaga for the benefit of cancelling out offset voltages to produce more accurate signals. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEBA POTHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9219. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached on 571.272.2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEBA POTHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638521
MAGNETIC SENSOR
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12625199
PIN PUSH INSPECTION CONNECTOR
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627008
BATTERY FOR TESTING SHORT CIRCUIT, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND BATTERY SAFETY ANALYSIS METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625173
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IN-SITU MEASUREMENT OF MUTUTAL INDUCTANCE BETWEEN EMBEDDED INTERCONNECTS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620884
CURRENT SAMPLING CIRCUIT
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month