Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/601,455

CURRENT SENSOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 11, 2024
Examiner
POTHEN, FEBA
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
498 granted / 616 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
661
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/17/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding amended claim 1, Applicant argues that “Cited references Hamamura and Miyakoshi fail to disclose, at least, ‘in a plane perpendicular to the X axis direction, the first magnetic sensor is situated at the first distance from the inner surface of the first portion of the first shield member.’”. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Miyakoshi shows that a magnetic sensor is situated at a distance from an inner surface of a first portion of a shield member (Fig. 1; magnetic body 4 or 5 having inner surfaces at distance from the magnetosensitive element 2). It is unclear how at least the Miyakoshi fails to disclose the placement/ distance of the magnetic sensor relative to the first shield member. Applicant has not specifically pointed out the differences between the prior art and the claimed invention and only has provided only an allegation that the claims define a patentable invention. Therefore, Examiner maintains the rejection of amended claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hamamura et al., JP 2019027875 in view of Miyakoshi et al., WO 2014203862 Regarding claim 1, Hamamura discloses a current sensor comprising: a busbar (Fig. 1; busbar B); a first magnetic sensor (Fig. 1-2; magnetic sensor 130); and a first coil (Fig. 1-2; compensation coil 120), wherein where a longitudinal direction of the busbar is defined as an X axis direction, and a width direction of the busbar is defined as a Y axis direction (Fig. 1; bus bar having x, y, z directions which can be a longitudinal or width direction), the first magnetic sensor measures a magnetic field in the Y axis direction, the first coil is arranged such that an axis of the first coil is parallel to the Y axis direction (Fig. 1-2; coil 120 having multiple axis and is therefore parallel to an axis direction of the busbar B), and the first magnetic sensor is arranged inside the first coil (Fig. 2; sensor 130 inserted in hole of bobbin accompanying the coil 120); a first shield member; and a second shield member (Fig. 2; plates 210 and 220), wherein the first shield member includes a first portion, a second portion, and a third portion (fig. 2; 210 includes three sides), wherein where a direction perpendicular to the X axis direction and the Y axis direction is defined as a Z axis direction, the first portion and the second portion of the first shield member extend in the X axis direction and the Z axis direction (fig. 2; plates 210 left and right sides extend in multiple direction), the third portion of the first shield member extends in the X axis direction and the Y axis direction, the first portion of the first shield member is connected to one end, in the Y axis direction, of the third portion of the first shield member (Fig, 2; middle portion connected to the sides), the second portion of the first shield member is connected to the other end, in the Y axis direction, of the third portion of the first shield member (Fig. 2; middle portion connected to sides), the second shield member includes a first portion, a second portion, and a third portion (fig. 2; 220 includes three sides), the first portion and the second portion of the second shield member extend in the X axis direction and the Z axis direction, the third portion of the second shield member extends in the X axis direction and the Y axis direction (Fig. 2; plates 220 left and right sides extend in multiple direction), the first portion of the second shield member is connected to one end, in the Y axis direction, of the third portion of the second shield member, the second portion of the second shield member is connected to the other end, in the Y axis direction, of the third portion of the second shield member (Fig, 2; middle portion connected to the sides), a length, in the Y axis direction, of the first shield member is the same as a length, in the Y axis direction (Fig. 2; as shown), of the second shield member, and the busbar, the first magnetic sensor, and the first coil are arranged inside an area surrounded by the first shield member and second shield member (Fig. 2; as shown). wherein a position, in the Y axis direction, of the first magnetic sensor is out of a plane formed of: a line passing through a center, in the Y axis direction, of the third portion of the first shield member and a center, in the Y axis direction, of the third portion of the second shield member; and a line parallel to the X axis direction (See Fig. 1-2). wherein where one surface on a side of the first magnetic sensor of two surfaces of the first portion of the first shield member extending in the X axis direction and the Z axis direction is defined as an inner surface of the first portion of the first shield member, one surface on a side of the first magnetic sensor of two surfaces of the third portion of the first shield member extending in the X axis direction and the Y axis direction is defined as an inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member, a plane formed of a line parallel to the X axis direction and a line parallel to the Y axis direction is defined as a horizontal plane, and a distance between the end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member is defined as a first distance, a distance between the first magnetic sensor and a plane situated away by the first distance from the inner surface of the first portion of the first shield member is equal to or less than a first value (Fig. 1-2; magnetic element is at a distance from the first shielding member therefore is considered to be a distance equal to or less than a first value). Hamamura is silent in the first shield member and the second shield member are arranged such that an end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and an end portion of the first portion of the second shield member face each other, and an end portion of the second portion of the first shield member and an end portion of the second portion of the second shield member face each other and in a plane perpendicular to the X axis direction, the first magnetic sensor is situated at the first distance from the inner surface of the first portion of the first shield member. Miyakoshi teaches a first shield member and a second shield member are arranged such that an end portion of a first portion of the first shield member and an end portion of a first portion of the second shield member face each other, and an end portion of a second portion of the first shield member and an end portion of a second portion of the second shield member face each other (Fig. 1; first and second magnetic body 4 and 5 having first and second portions that face each other) and in a plane perpendicular to the X axis direction, the first magnetic sensor is situated at the first distance from the inner surface of the first portion of the first shield member (Fig. 1; magnetic body 4 or 5 having inner surfaces at distance from the magnetosensitive element 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Miyakoshi into Hamamura since the substitution of the shield member would produce the predictable result of reducing the external interference. Regarding claim 5, Hamamura as modified discloses the current sensor according to claim 4. Hamamura teaches wherein one of two surfaces, on a side of the first magnetic sensor, of the third portion of the second shield member extending in the X axis direction and the Y axis direction is defined as an inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member, the distance between the end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member is the same as a distance between the end portion of the second portion of the first shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member, and a distance between the end portion of the first portion of the second shield member and a horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member is the same as a distance between the end portion of the second portion of the second shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member (Fig. 1-2; distance from first and second end portions of the first and second shield to the top portion of the shields are the same). Regarding claim 6, Hamamura as modified discloses the current sensor according to claim 5. Hamamura teaches wherein a distance between the first magnetic sensor and a horizontal plane containing a center between the end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and the end portion of the first portion of the second shield member and a center between the end portion of the second portion of the first shield member and the end portion of the second portion of the second shield member is equal to or more than a second value (Fig. 1-2; first end portion of the first shield member and the second shield member is at a distance from each other and is considered a distance having a second value; the distance from the second end portion of the first shield member and the second shield member are at a same distance as that of the first end portions and therefore also have a second value). Regarding claim 7, Hamamura as modified discloses the current sensor according to claim 4. Hamamura teaches wherein the distance between the end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member is equal to or more than the distance between the end portion of the first portion of the second shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member (Fig. 1-2; first and second shield members are of equal size and therefore share the similar distances between end portions and horizontal portions). Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hamamura et al., JP 2019027875 in view of Miyakoshi et al., WO 2014203862 in view of Kasajima et al. US 20150115938 Regarding claim 8, Hamamura as modified discloses the current sensor according to claim 4. Hamamura is silent in a second magnetic sensor configured to measure a magnetic field in the Y axis direction, a second coil, wherein the second coil is arranged such that an axis of the second coil is parallel to the Y axis direction, and the second magnetic sensor is arranged inside the second coil. Kasajima teaches a second magnetic sensor configured to measure a magnetic field in the Y axis direction, a second coil, wherein the second coil is arranged such that an axis of the second coil is parallel to the Y axis direction, and the second magnetic sensor is arranged inside the second coil (Fig. 6; magnetic detection element 20 with coil 121). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Kasajima into Hamamura for the benefit of detecting magnetic field in multiple locations so that a more accurate measurement can be acheived. Claim(s) 9, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hamamura et al., JP 2019027875 in view of Miyakoshi et al., WO 2014203862 in view of Kasajima et al. US 20150115938 in view of Esaka et al., US 20190293733 Regarding claim 9, Hamamura as modified discloses the current sensor according to claim 8. Hamamura teaches wherein where one surface on a side of the first magnetic sensor of two surfaces of the second portion of the first shield member extending in the X axis direction and the Z axis direction is defined as an inner surface of the second portion of the first shield member (Fig. 1-2; inner surface of the second end portion). Hamamura is silent in a distance between the second magnetic sensor and a plane situated away by the first distance from the inner surface of the second portion of the first shield member is equal to or less than a third value. Esaka teaches a second magnetic sensor and a plane situated away by a distance from an inner surface of a second portion of a first shield member is equal to or less than a third value (Fig. 2; sensors 11, 12 is a distance away from an inner surface of a shield 21). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Esaka into Hamamura for the benefit of preventing the influence of a leakage magnetic field. Regarding claim 10, Hamamura as modified discloses the current sensor according to claim 9. Hamamura teaches wherein one surface on a side of the first magnetic sensor of two surfaces of the third portion of the second shield member extending in the X axis direction and the Y axis direction is defined as an inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member, the distance between the end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member is the same as a distance between the end portion of the second portion of the first shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the first shield member, a distance between the end portion of the first portion of the second shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member is the same as a distance between the end portion of the second portion of the second shield member and the horizontal plane containing the inner surface of the third portion of the second shield member (Fig. 1-2; first and second shield members are the same dimension and therefore have equal distances). Hamamura is silent in a distance between the second magnetic sensor and a horizontal plane containing a center between the end portion of the first portion of the first shield member and the end portion of the first portion of the second shield member and a center between the end portion of the second portion of the first shield member and the end portion of the second portion of the second shield member is equal to or more than a fourth value. Esaka discloses a distance between a second magnetic sensor and a horizontal plane containing a center between a first end portion of the first shield member and a first end portion of the second shield member and a center between a second end portion of the first shield member and a second end portion of the second shield member is equal to or more than a fourth value (Fig. 2; distance in the x axis direction is considered a fourth value). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Esaka into Hamamura for the benefit of preventing the influence of a leakage magnetic field. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEBA POTHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9219. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEBA POTHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601672
SENSITIVITY AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR MAGNETOCHEMICAL SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601700
REAL-TIME MONITORING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SURFACE SALT DEPOSITION AMOUNT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596087
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING CONDENSATION AND/OR ADVANCE OF CORROSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584900
METHOD, KIT, AND SENSOR FOR DETECTING ANTIBODY OF INTEREST IN WASTEWATER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571840
Array of Through-Silicon Via Contact Points on a Semiconductor Die
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month