Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/601,597

System and Method for Dimensioning Objects

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 11, 2024
Examiner
HOPKINS, BRANDI N
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Zebra Technologies Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
603 granted / 705 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
719
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
67.7%
+27.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 705 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIMENSIONING OBJECTS Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement No information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted. Oath/Declaration The Oath/Declaration submitted on 03/11/2024 is noted by the Examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to because: Figure 7A: The outside box is blank and should also be labeled – field of view 116- in order to more easily identify the structure of the invention. Figure 7B: The outside box is blank and should also be labeled – field of view 116- in order to more easily identify the structure of the invention. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Thrimawithana (US 2023/0025659). The applied reference has a common Applicant with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. PNG media_image1.png 264 178 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Thrimawithana discloses a dimensioning device (104) having a depth sensor configured to obtain depth data within a field of view (see abstract); a processor (200) interconnected with the depth sensor (220), the processor (200) configured to obtain depth data within the field of view including an object to be dimensioned (¶0012, lines 1-3); obtain a subset of the depth data from a predefined target region within the field of view (¶0013, lines 1-3); select a dimensioning function for the object (¶0012, lines 7-9), the dimensioning function having a target orientation of the object (¶0026, lines 1-12); validate the target orientation of the object based on the subset of the depth data in the predefined target region (¶0033, lines 1-6; Fig. 4); and when the target orientation is validated, apply the dimensioning function to obtain dimensions of the object (¶0033, lines 7-14) Regarding claims 2 and 11, Thrimawithana further the processor being configured to select the dimensioning function for the object by: detecting an element of the object in the target region (¶0034, lines 6-13); and selecting the dimensioning function based on the detected element of the object (¶0024, lines 1-9). Regarding claims 3 and 12, Thrimawithana further discloses the processor (200) being further configured to display a region indicator representing the target region at a display of the dimensioning device (“The input devices 224 may include one or more buttons, keypads, touch-sensitive display screens or the like for receiving input from an operator”; ¶0023, lines 2-4). Regarding claims 4 and 13, Thrimawithana further discloses the dimensioning function having a perpendicular-face approach (Fig. 4), and wherein the target orientation includes an orientation of a surface perpendicular to a principal axis of the depth sensor (¶0027, lines 2-7). Regarding claims 8 and 17, Thrimawithana further discloses the dimensioning function comprises a two-sided perspective approach (¶0037, lines 2-4), and wherein the target orientation of the object results in a perspective view including two sides of the object (¶0040). Regarding claims 9 and 18, Thrimawithana further discloses the dimensioning function having a three-sided perspective approach (¶0026, lines 1-3), and wherein the target orientation of the object results in a perspective view including three sides of the object ;( “the object model may be, for example, a line, a plane a rectangular prism” ¶0027, lines 2-7). Regarding claim 10, Thrimawithana discloses method including obtaining depth data within a field of view including an object to be dimensioned (see abstract); obtaining a subset of the depth data from a predefined target region within the field of view (¶0027, lines 7-10); selecting a dimensioning function for the object, the dimensioning function having a target orientation of the object (¶0033, lines 7-14); validating the target orientation of the object based on the subset of the depth data in the predefined target region (¶0034, lines 6-13); and when the target orientation is validated, applying the dimensioning function to obtain dimensions of the object (¶0028, lines 1-7). Regarding claim 19, Thrimawithana discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions thereon, which when executed configure a processor (¶0051) to: obtain depth data within a field of view including an object to be dimensioned (see abstract); obtain a subset of the depth data from a predefined target region within the field of view (¶0027, lines 7-10); select a dimensioning function for the object (¶0012, lines 7-9), the dimensioning function having a target orientation of the object (¶0026, lines 1-12); validate the target orientation of the object based on the subset of the depth data in the predefined target region (¶0033, lines 1-6; Fig. 4); and when the target orientation is validated(¶0024, lines 1-9), apply the dimensioning function to obtain dimensions of the object (¶0034, lines 6-13). Regarding claim 20, Thrimawithana further discloses the instructions further configure the processor to: segment the depth data and discard segments of the depth data outside the predefined target region (¶0031, lines 6-10); and apply the dimensioning function a segment of the depth data originating in the predefined target region (¶0032 4-11 and ¶3300, lines 1-7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7 and 14-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDI N HOPKINS whose telephone number is (571)270-7042. The examiner can normally be reached M & F 9-5 and T-TH, 6-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Deherrera can be reached at (303) 297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDI N HOPKINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638347
NANOSENSOR FOR FORCE SENSING, AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631506
A PRINTED ELECTRONIC SENSING DEVICE AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617110
SHAVING RAZOR COMPONENT TEST METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618757
SHAVING RAZOR COMPONENT TEST APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613171
BATTERY CELL STRENGTH TEST JIG AND BATTERY CELL STRENGTH TEST DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 705 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month