DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-3, 5, 7-9, 11, 13-15, 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sun et al. (US# 2026/0025775 hereinafter referred to as Sun).
RE Claim 1, Sun discloses a wireless communication method, comprising:
transmitting, by a communication device, at least one timing advance value associated with a time period (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – transmitting TA report),
wherein the at least one timing advance value is transmitted based on a trigger condition (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – TA report based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold), and
wherein the time period corresponds to a transmission duration of a message for a shared channel (See Sun [0028], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to transmission duration for PUSCH transmission) or a random access channel (See Sun [0034], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to transmission duration for PRACH transmissions).
RE Claim 2, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is transmitted in response to the at least one timing advance value being above a threshold value (See Sun [0036], [0046] - based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold).
RE Claim 3, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above,
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is transmitted in response to the at least one timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different from another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] – when TA changes compared to previous TA (applicable to sets of subframes), then trigger condition is met), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] –compared to previous TA of previous subframes).
RE Claim 5, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the at least one timing advance value correspond to at least one segment in the time period (See Sun FIG 4; Claim 1 – TA corresponding to set of subframes), and
wherein the trigger condition specifies that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting each timing advance value of each of a plurality of segments (See Sun FIG 4; Claim 1 – triggering TA report indicating change in TA in a # of subframes).
RE Claim 7, Sun discloses a wireless communication method, comprising:
receiving, by a network device, at least one timing advance value associated with a time period (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – receiving TA report),
wherein the at least one timing advance value is received based on a trigger condition (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – TA report based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold), and
wherein the time period corresponds to a reception duration of a message for a shared channel (See Sun [0028], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to reception duration for PUSCH transmission) or a random access channel (See Sun [0034], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to reception duration for PRACH transmissions).
RE Claim 8, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 7 above, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is received in response to the at least one timing advance value being above a threshold value (See Sun [0036], [0046] - based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold).
RE Claim 9, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 7 above,
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is received in response to the at least one timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different from another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] – when TA changes compared to previous TA (applicable to sets of subframes), then trigger condition is met), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] –compared to previous TA of previous subframes).
RE Claim 11, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 7 above, wherein the at least one timing advance value correspond to at least one segment in the time period (See Sun FIG 4; Claim 1 – TA corresponding to set of subframes), and
wherein the trigger condition specifies that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving each timing advance value of each of a plurality of segments (See Sun FIG 4; Claim 1 – triggering TA report indicating change in TA in a # of subframes).
RE Claim 13, Sun discloses an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising a processor (See Sun FIGs 10-11), configured to implement a method, the processor configured to:
transmit, by a communication device, at least one timing advance value associated with a time period (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – transmitting TA report),
wherein the at least one timing advance value is transmitted based on a trigger condition (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – TA report based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold), and
wherein the time period corresponds to a transmission duration of a message for a shared channel (See Sun [0028], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to transmission duration for PUSCH transmission) or a random access channel (See Sun [0034], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to transmission duration for PRACH transmissions).
RE Claim 14, Sun discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 13 above, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is transmitted in response to the at least one timing advance value being above a threshold value (See Sun [0036], [0046] - based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold).
RE Claim 15, Sun discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 13 above,
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is transmitted in response to the at least one timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different from another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] – when TA changes compared to previous TA (applicable to sets of subframes), then trigger condition is met), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] –compared to previous TA of previous subframes).
RE Claim 17, Sun discloses an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising a processor (See Sun FIGs 10-11), configured to implement a method, the processor configured to:
receive, by a network device, at least one timing advance value associated with a time period (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – receiving TA report),
wherein the at least one timing advance value is received based on a trigger condition (See Sun [0036], [0045], Claim 1 – TA report based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold), and
wherein the time period corresponds to a reception duration of a message for a shared channel (See Sun [0028], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to reception duration for PUSCH transmission) or a random access channel (See Sun [0034], [0036], [0045] – i.e. corresponding to reception duration for PRACH transmissions).
RE Claim 18, Sun discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 17 above, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is received in response to the at least one timing advance value being above a threshold value (See Sun [0036], [0046] - based on trigger condition such as timing/distance difference crossing a threshold).
RE Claim 19, Sun discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 17 above,
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the at least one timing advance value is received in response to the at least one timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different from another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] – when TA changes compared to previous TA (applicable to sets of subframes), then trigger condition is met), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun FIG 4; [0046] –compared to previous TA of previous subframes).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
Claims 4, 10, 16, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sun et al. (US# 2026/0025775 hereinafter referred to as Sun) in view of Cheng et al. (US# 2022/0330187 hereinafter referred to as Cheng).
RE Claim 4, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above. Sun does not specifically disclose wherein the trigger condition indicates that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is transmitted in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain.
However, Cheng teaches of wherein the trigger condition indicates that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values (See Cheng [0236] – indicating transmitting max RTT),
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is transmitted in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Cheng [0236] – if UE calculated TA is greater than max RTT UE calculated TA provided by NW, the UE may use maximum UE-calculated TA for PRACH preamble transmission), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun [0264] – updating TA from previous transmission).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless transmission system, as disclosed in Sun, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is transmitted in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain, as taught in Cheng. One is motivated as such in order to help improve timing alignment in NTN networks (See Cheng Background; Summary).
RE Claim 10, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 7 above. Sun does not specifically disclose wherein the trigger condition indicates that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is received in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain.
However, Cheng teaches of wherein the trigger condition indicates that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values (See Cheng [0236] – indicating transmitting max RTT),
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is received in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Cheng [0236] – if UE calculated TA is greater than max RTT UE calculated TA provided by NW, the UE may use maximum UE-calculated TA for PRACH preamble transmission), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun [0264] – updating TA from previous transmission).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless transmission system, as disclosed in Sun, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is received in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain, as taught in Cheng. One is motivated as such in order to help improve timing alignment in NTN networks (See Cheng Background; Summary).
RE Claim 16, Sun discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 13 above. Sun does not specifically disclose wherein the trigger condition indicates that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is transmitted in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain.
However, Cheng teaches of wherein the trigger condition indicates that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values (See Cheng [0236] – indicating transmitting max RTT),
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is transmitted in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Cheng [0236] – if UE calculated TA is greater than max RTT UE calculated TA provided by NW, the UE may use maximum UE-calculated TA for PRACH preamble transmission), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun [0264] – updating TA from previous transmission).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless transmission system, as disclosed in Sun, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the transmitting the at least one timing advance value includes transmitting a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is transmitted in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain, as taught in Cheng. One is motivated as such in order to help improve timing alignment in NTN networks (See Cheng Background; Summary).
RE Claim 20, Sun discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 17 above. Sun does not specifically disclose wherein the trigger condition indicates that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is received in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain.
However, Cheng teaches of wherein the trigger condition indicates that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values (See Cheng [0236] – indicating transmitting max RTT),
wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is received in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment (See Cheng [0236] – if UE calculated TA is greater than max RTT UE calculated TA provided by NW, the UE may use maximum UE-calculated TA for PRACH preamble transmission), and
wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain (See Sun [0264] – updating TA from previous transmission).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless transmission system, as disclosed in Sun, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the receiving the at least one timing advance value includes receiving a largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values, wherein the trigger condition indicates that the largest timing advance value from a plurality of timing advance values is received in response to the largest timing advance value associated with a corresponding segment being different than another timing advance value associated with another segment, and wherein the another segment is located prior to the corresponding segment in time domain, as taught in Cheng. One is motivated as such in order to help improve timing alignment in NTN networks (See Cheng Background; Summary).
Claims 6, 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sun et al. (US# 2026/0025775 hereinafter referred to as Sun) in view of Shin et al. (US# 2025/0048291 hereinafter referred to as Shin).
RE Claim 6, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above. Sun does not specifically disclose wherein the transmitting includes transmitting a timing advance report that includes an indication that indicates a relative value of a first timing advance value compared to a second timing advance value, wherein the first timing advance value is within a first time period and the second timing advance value is within a second time period, wherein the first time period is later in time than the second time period for which the communication device transmitted another timing advance report that included the second timing advance value, and wherein the another timing advance report is transmitted prior to the timing advance report.
However, Shin teaches wherein the transmitting includes transmitting a timing advance report that includes an indication that indicates a relative value of a first timing advance value compared to a second timing advance value (See Shin [0196] – reporting only part (offset) TA difference value from a recently reported value),
wherein the first timing advance value is within a first time period and the second timing advance value is within a second time period (See Shin [0196] – current TA value is a first time period and recently reported TA value is a second time period),
wherein the first time period is later in time than the second time period for which the communication device transmitted another timing advance report that included the second timing advance value (See Shin [0196] – current TA value is later in time than recently reported TA value (i.e. recently reported value)), and
wherein the another timing advance report is transmitted prior to the timing advance report (See Shin [0196] – i.e. recently reported value).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless transmission system, as disclosed in Sun, wherein the transmitting includes transmitting a timing advance report that includes an indication that indicates a relative value of a first timing advance value compared to a second timing advance value, wherein the first timing advance value is within a first time period and the second timing advance value is within a second time period, wherein the first time period is later in time than the second time period for which the communication device transmitted another timing advance report that included the second timing advance value, and wherein the another timing advance report is transmitted prior to the timing advance report, as taught in Shin. One is motivated as such in order to better adjust or update a reference for time/frequency for wireless systems (See Shin [0004]-[0011]).
RE Claim 12, Sun discloses a method, as set forth in claim 7 above. Sun does not specifically disclose wherein the receiving includes receiving a timing advance report that includes an indication that indicates a relative value of a first timing advance value compared to a second timing advance value, wherein the first timing advance value is within a first time period and the second timing advance value is within a second time period, wherein the first time period is later in time than the second time period for which the network device received another timing advance report that included the second timing advance value, and wherein the another timing advance report is received prior to the timing advance report.
However, Shin teaches wherein the receiving includes receiving a timing advance report that includes an indication that indicates a relative value of a first timing advance value compared to a second timing advance value (See Shin [0196] – receiving only part (offset) TA difference value from a recently reported value),
wherein the first timing advance value is within a first time period and the second timing advance value is within a second time period (See Shin [0196] – current TA value is a first time period and recently reported TA value is a second time period),
wherein the first time period is later in time than the second time period for which the network device received another timing advance report that included the second timing advance value (See Shin [0196] – current TA value is later in time than recently reported TA value (i.e. recently reported value)), and
wherein the another timing advance report is received prior to the timing advance report (See Shin [0196] – i.e. recently reported value).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless transmission system, as disclosed in Sun, wherein the receiving includes receiving a timing advance report that includes an indication that indicates a relative value of a first timing advance value compared to a second timing advance value, wherein the first timing advance value is within a first time period and the second timing advance value is within a second time period, wherein the first time period is later in time than the second time period for which the network device received another timing advance report that included the second timing advance value, and wherein the another timing advance report is received prior to the timing advance report, as taught in Shin. One is motivated as such in order to better adjust or update a reference for time/frequency for wireless systems (See Shin [0004]-[0011]).
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steve R Young whose telephone number is (571)270-7518. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G Shah can be reached at (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/STEVE R YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477