Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/602,008

DRIVE TRANSMISSION DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS INCORPORATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 11, 2024
Examiner
HALL, ZACHARY A
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ricoh Company, LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
83 granted / 137 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 137 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 11 March 2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 3 line 2 recites: “…is only one in the press-fit portion…”. This should be corrected to read - - is only one portion in the press-fit portion - -. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 and 11-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Tomita (US 10,429,786 B2). Regarding claim 1, Tomita discloses a drive transmission device (see Figs. 19A1) comprising: a drive transmission member (75 in Figs. 19A1-A3) to receive a driving force from a drive source, the drive transmission member having an insertion portion (75c); and a rotation shaft (73) including: a press-fit portion (73 in Figs. 19A1-A3) to press-fit into the insertion portion of the drive transmission member after insertion of an axial tip of the rotation shaft into the insertion portion of the drive transmission member (see Figs. 19A1-A3), the press-fit portion including a press-fit flat portion (173c) parallel to an axial direction of the rotation shaft (see Fig. 19A1); and another flat portion (173a and F in annotated Figure 19A2 below) at a position closer to the axial tip than the press-fit flat portion (see Fig. 19A1), wherein the insertion portion of the drive transmission member has an inner-wall flat portion (175b) to contact the press-fit flat portion when the press-fit portion is press-fitted into the insertion portion (see Figs. 19A2-A3), and wherein said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a) is parallel to the press-fit flat portion that has a distance (H1) from an axial center of the rotation shaft smaller than the press-fit flat portion (H2). PNG media_image1.png 290 631 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1. Annotated Figure 19A2. Regarding claim 2, Tomita discloses wherein the insertion portion (75c) of the drive transmission member (75) is formed with a through hole (see Fig. 19A1). Regarding claim 3, Tomita discloses wherein the press-fit flat portion (173c) is only one portion in the press-fit portion (see Fig. 19A1). Regarding claim 4, Tomita discloses wherein the rotation shaft (73) has an inclined surface (173b) that connects said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a) and the press-fit flat portion (173c). Regarding claim 5, Tomita discloses wherein an angle between the inclined surface (173b) and said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a) at a most upstream position of said another flat portion in a direction of the insertion of the axial tip of the rotation shaft (73) is equal to or lower than an angle between an inclined surface (175c) of an entrance edge portion and the inner-wall flat portion (175b) in the insertion portion of the drive transmission member (75). Regarding claim 6, Tomita discloses wherein a height of the inclined surface (173b) relative to said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a) at a most upstream position of said another flat portion in a direction of the insertion of the axial tip (see Fig. 19A1) is equal to or less than (see Fig. 19A2) a height of an inclined surface (175c) of an entrance edge portion relative to the inner-wall flat portion (175b) in the insertion portion (75c) of the drive transmission member. Regarding claim 7, Tomita discloses wherein a length (A in annotated Figure 19A1 below) of the press-fit flat portion (173c) in the axial direction is longer than a length (B in annotated Figure 19A1 below) of said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a) in the axial direction. NOTE: The claim only requires “a length” of each flat portion, not an entire length. Accordingly, the annotated figures below set fort “a length” of each flat portion. PNG media_image2.png 447 435 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure 2. Annotated Figure 19A1. Regarding claim 8, Tomita discloses wherein a length (C in annotated Figure 19A1 below) of the press-fit flat portion (173c) in the axial direction is equal to or less than a length (D in annotated Figure 19A1 below) of said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a) in the axial direction. NOTE: The claim only requires “a length” of each flat portion, not an entire length. Accordingly, the annotated figures below set fort “a length” of each flat portion. PNG media_image3.png 439 434 media_image3.png Greyscale Figure 3. Annotated Figure 19A1. Regarding claim 11, Tomita discloses wherein the drive transmission member (75) is a gear (see Column 9 lines 44-51). Regarding claim 12, Tomita discloses wherein the drive transmission member (75) is a resin-molded product (see Column 10 lines 1-9). Regarding claim 13, Tomita discloses wherein the insertion portion (75c) of the drive transmission member (75) is formed with a through hole (see Fig. 19A1), and wherein a relation of H1 ≤ H3 < H2 is satisfied, where when the through hole is viewed from the axial direction, H1 (h1) represents a distance between the axial center of the rotation shaft and said another flat portion (specifically portion 173a, see Fig. 19A1) of the rotation shaft, H2 (h2) represents a distance between the axial center of the rotation shaft and the press-fit flat portion (173c) of the rotation shaft (see Fig. 19A1), and H3 (h4) represents a distance between a center of the through hole and the inner-wall flat portion (175b, see Fig. 19A3). Regarding claim 14, Tomita discloses wherein the rotation shaft (73) has a mark (E in annotated Figure 19A3 below) indicating an insertion position of the rotation shaft with respect to the insertion portion (75c) of the drive transmission member (75). PNG media_image4.png 427 438 media_image4.png Greyscale Figure 4. Annotated Figure 19A3. Regarding claim 15, Tomita discloses an image forming apparatus for forming an image on a recording medium (see Abstract), the apparatus comprising: a driven member (72); and the drive transmission device according to claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1 above) to transmit the driving force of the drive source to the driven member (see Column 9 lines 60-63). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tomita (US 10,429,786 B2) in view of Schwaerzler (JP 06213242 A). Regarding claim 9, Tomita discloses wherein the insertion portion (75c) of the drive transmission member is formed with a through hole (see Fig. 19A1), the rotation shaft (73) has a groove (G in annotated Figure 19A1 below) in a portion that is placed outside the insertion portion after the rotation shaft passes through the insertion portion and is press-fitted (see Fig. 19A3), said another flat portion (173a and F in annotated Figure 19A2 above) has a flat part (specifically portion F in annotated Figure 19A2 above) closer to the axial tip in the axial direction than the groove is (see Fig. 19A3). Tomita fails to disclose as claimed a stopper to prevent the rotation shaft from disengaging from the insertion portion, and wherein the stopper is fitted in the groove. However, Schwaerzler teaches a stopper (15) to prevent the rotation shaft (11) from disengaging from the insertion portion (13), and wherein the stopper is fitted in the groove (16), in order to provide further means to prevent unintended separation between the shaft and insertion portion. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the connection of Tomita, with Schwaerzler, such that the stopper of Schwaerzler is in the groove of Tomita, in order to provide further means to prevent unintended separation between the shaft and insertion portion. PNG media_image5.png 475 303 media_image5.png Greyscale Figure 5. Annotated Figure 19A1. Claim(s) 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tomita (US 10,429,786 B2) in view of Noda (US 6,400,914 B1). Regarding claim 10, Tomita discloses wherein the drive transmission member (75) is a pulley (see Fig. 19A1), but fails to disclose as claimed that the pulley is a belt pulley. However, Noda teaches a drive transmission device (see Fig. 44) comprising a drive transmission member (43) that can transmit force via a gear train or a belt pulley (see Column 30 lines 61-65), in order to provide a transmission that can be adaptable to function on the least expensive and most accessible parts components. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the drive transmission device of Tomita, with Noda, such that it comprises the belt pulley transmission of Noda, in order to provide a transmission that can be adaptable to function on the least expensive and most accessible parts components. Further, providing the belt pulley transmission of Noda on Tomita allows the wear and tear to be applied to inexpensive and replaceable belts, therefore protecting more complex transmission components such as gears and pulleys. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY A HALL whose telephone number is (571)272-5907. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday 8:00am to 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached on 571-270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZAH/Examiner, Art Unit 3678 /AMBER R ANDERSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595661
LENGTH ADJUSTABLE RAILING PANEL WITH REMOVABLE UPRIGHT END RAILS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576503
CONNECTION ASSEMBLY FOR A HAND-GUIDED MACHINE TOOL AND HAND-GUIDED MACHINE TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560198
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-DOF CROSS-PIVOT FLEXURE BEARING WITH ENHANCED RANGE AND ENHANCED LOAD CAPACITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560189
JOINT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12544692
STRUCTURE FOR ASSEMBLING AND DISASSEMBLING DIRT SUCTION HEAD TO/FROM FILTER BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.5%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 137 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month