Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/602,552

POWER CONTROL METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SAME

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 12, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0148729 +2 more
Examiner
MCDANIEL, TYNESE V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
219 granted / 374 resolved
-1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
401
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 374 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 3/12/2024. Claims 1-15 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/12/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (b), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. As to claim 12, which recites “determining a change in a state of the electronic device during a set second time period; and based on the state of the electronic device not being changed during the second time period, outputting the signal to turn off the power” which is unclear. Claim 12 states that a change in a state of the electronic device occurred during the set second time period (i.e. “determining a change in a state of the electronic device during a set second time period”). However claim 12 also states that change in a state of the electronic device DID NOT occur during the set second time period (i.e. “based on the state of the electronic device not being changed during the second time period”). Therefore it is unclear whether the state of the electronic device changed during the set second time period. Examiner will interpret as “…based on the state of the electronic device being changed during the second time period”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kadonoff (US 20150108966) In view of Zheng (US 20180123183). As to claim 8, Kadonoff discloses a power control method (Fig. 2 [0120]) comprising: receiving an input to set an electronic device to a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current (Fig. 2 [0120] the system 2 may operate in a hibernation mode. A hibernation mode can be defined by the system 2 controllers and regulators being completely unpowered. This situation can be caused by: a factory ship; when the meter determines there is insufficient power to remain in sleep or active mode) turning off power of the electronic device (Fig. 2 “Shutdown power”); and setting the electronic device to the ship mode (Fig. 2 [0120] the system 2 may operate in a hibernation mode. A hibernation mode can be defined by the system 2 controllers and regulators being completely unpowered. This situation can be caused by: a factory ship; when the meter determines there is insufficient power to remain in sleep or active mode). Kadonoff does not disclose/teach storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory. Zheng teaches storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory ([0006] The control unit is configured to acquire state information of the battery core and store the state information to the ferromagnetic random access memory, and switch on or off an electrical connection between the power input terminal and the battery core to switch the ferromagnetic random access memory to the dynamic mode or the non-volatile mode). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power control method of Kadonoff to include storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory in order to reduce the power consumption of the control circuit to zero, thereby effectively extending storage life of the battery 100 ([0021]). Claims 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rhee (US 20030122524) in view of Kadonoff (US 20150108966) in view of Zheng (US 20180123183). As to claim 8, Rhee discloses a power control method (Fig. 2 [0017]) comprising: receiving an input to set an electronic device to a sleep mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery (Abstract..the system is operated in the sleep mode using a minimum amount of power…[0017 The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power.. When the detected battery voltage level is above a system off voltage level, which turns off the system, and below the reference voltage level, the system operates in a sleep mode. In the sleep mode, only a real time clock (RTC) and a DRAM refresh operate) turning off power of the electronic device ([0023] Fig. 2 205); and setting the electronic device to the sleep mode ([0017 The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power.. When the detected battery voltage level is above a system off voltage level, which turns off the system, and below the reference voltage level, the system operates in a sleep mode. In the sleep mode, only a real time clock (RTC) and a DRAM refresh operate). Rhee does not disclose/teach setting the electronic device to a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current after the first time period has elapsed. Kadonoff teaches setting the electronic device to a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current after the first time period has elapsed (Fig. 2 [0120] the system 2 may operate in a hibernation mode. A hibernation mode can be defined by the system 2 controllers and regulators being completely unpowered. This situation can be caused by: a factory ship; when the meter determines there is insufficient power to remain in sleep or active mode; It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the sleep mode of Rhee to be a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current after the first time period has elapsed in order for the battery may be beneficial for operation with intermittent loads and longer periods without loads due to the lower self-discharge of the battery when operating in a hibernation mode [0115]. Rhee does not disclose/teach storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory. Zheng teaches storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory ([0006] The control unit is configured to acquire state information of the battery core and store the state information to the ferromagnetic random access memory, and switch on or off an electrical connection between the power input terminal and the battery core to switch the ferromagnetic random access memory to the dynamic mode or the non-volatile mode). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power control method of Rhee to include storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory in order to reduce the power consumption of the control circuit to zero, thereby effectively extending storage life of the battery 100 ([0021]). As to claim 9, Rhee in view of Kadonoff in view of Zheng teaches the power control method of claim 8, wherein the setting of the electronic device to the ship mode comprises: setting the electronic device to the ship mode by monitoring the voltage of the battery after turning off the power of the electronic device and comparing the monitored voltage of the battery to the voltage of the battery based on receiving the input ([0017] of Rhee. The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power. When the detected battery voltage level is above a system off voltage level, which turns off the system, and below the reference voltage level, the system operates in a sleep mode. In the sleep mode, only a real time clock (RTC) and a DRAM refresh operate. Kadonoff teaches “ship mode”. (Fig. 2 [0120] ). As to claim 10, Rhee in view of Kadonoff in view of Zheng teaches the power control method of claim 8, wherein the setting of the electronic device to the ship mode comprises: setting the electronic device to the ship mode based on a change in the voltage of the battery within a set time period after turning off the power of the electronic device ([0017] of Rhee. The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power. When the detected battery voltage level is above a system off voltage level, which turns off the system, and below the reference voltage level, the system operates in a sleep mode. In the sleep mode, only a real time clock (RTC) and a DRAM refresh operate. Kadonoff teaches “ship mode”. (Fig. 2 [0120] ). Claims 11-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rhee (US 20030122524) in view of Kadonoff (US 20150108966). As to claim 11, Rhee discloses A power control method (Fig. 2 [0017]) comprising: identifying a signal to turn off power of an electronic device ([0023] Fig. 2 205 and The CPU 105 turns off the power of the system in correspondence to the power off signal from the power control unit 102); turning off the power of the electronic device ([0023] Fig. 2 205); counting a set first time period from when the signal to turn off the power is identified ([0017] which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power); setting the electronic device to a sleep mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery (Abstract..the system is operated in the sleep mode using a minimum amount of power) after the first time period has elapsed ([0017 The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power.. When the detected battery voltage level is above a system off voltage level, which turns off the system, and below the reference voltage level, the system operates in a sleep mode. In the sleep mode, only a real time clock (RTC) and a DRAM refresh operate). Rhee does not disclose/teach setting the electronic device to a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current after the first time period has elapsed. Kadonoff teaches setting the electronic device to a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current after the first time period has elapsed (Fig. 2 [0120] the system 2 may operate in a hibernation mode. A hibernation mode can be defined by the system 2 controllers and regulators being completely unpowered. This situation can be caused by: a factory ship; when the meter determines there is insufficient power to remain in sleep or active mode; It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the sleep mode of Rhee to be a ship mode to prevent and/or reduce discharge of a battery due to a leakage current after the first time period has elapsed in order for the battery may be beneficial for operation with intermittent loads and longer periods without loads due to the lower self-discharge of the battery when operating in a hibernation mode [0115]. As to claim 12, Rhee in view of Kadonoff teaches power control method of claim 11, wherein the identifying of the signal to turn off the power of the electronic device comprises: determining a change in a state of the electronic device during a set second time period; and based on the state of the electronic device not being changed during the second time period, outputting the signal to turn off the power ([0017] of Rhee. The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power. When the detected battery voltage level is above a system off voltage level, which turns off the system, and below the reference voltage level, the system operates in a sleep mode. In the sleep mode, only a real time clock (RTC) and a DRAM refresh operate. KADONOFF teaches “ship mode”. (Fig. 2 [0120]). As to claim 13, Rhee in view of Kadonoff teaches power control method of claim 11. Rhee in view of Kadonoff does not disclose/teach wherein the setting of the ship mode comprises: storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory. Zheng teaches wherein the setting of the ship mode comprises: storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory ([0006] The control unit is configured to acquire state information of the battery core and store the state information to the ferromagnetic random access memory, and switch on or off an electrical connection between the power input terminal and the battery core to switch the ferromagnetic random access memory to the dynamic mode or the non-volatile mode). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power control method of Rhee to include wherein the setting of the ship mode comprises: storing power gauge data related to a state of the battery in a memory in order to reduce the power consumption of the control circuit 17 to zero, thereby effectively extending storage life of the battery 100 ([0021]). As to claim 14, Rhee in view of Kadonoff in view of Zheng teaches power control method of claim 13 wherein based on a power key being input or an adapter being inserted in the ship mode, loading the power gauge data stored in the memory ([0006] of Zheng The control unit is configured to acquire state information of the battery core and store the state information to the ferromagnetic random access memory, and switch on or off an electrical connection between the power input terminal and the battery core to switch the ferromagnetic random access memory to the dynamic mode or the non-volatile mode) As to claim 15, Rhee in view of Kadonoff teaches power control method of claim 11 wherein the first time period is set to have a positive correlation with a voltage magnitude of the battery based on identifying the signal to turn off the power ([0017] of Rhee. The power control unit 102 compares the battery voltage level, which is detected after the predetermined period of time from turning off the system power). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding independent claim 1, Although the prior art discloses a power control method, the prior art of record does not disclose or teach the combination of: “a receiving an input to turn off power of an electronic device; identifying a voltage of a battery based on receiving the input; determining a reference voltage to enter a ship mode to prevent and/or or reduce discharge of the battery due to a leakage current based on a set margin voltage and a voltage of the battery based on receiving the input; turning off the power of the electronic device; monitoring the voltage of the battery after turning off the power of the electronic device; and setting the electronic device to the ship mode based on a monitored voltage of the battery and the reference voltage.” Dependent claims 2-7 are allowable for the reasons set forth supra with respect to the independent claims from which they depend. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion and Related Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wu et al (US 20150108966) is cited for having a battery shipping mode. Wu et al (US 20160126758) ) is cited for having a battery shipping mode. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYNESE V MCDANIEL whose telephone number is (313)446-6579. The examiner can normally be reached on M to F, 9am to 530pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYNESE V MCDANIEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744399
BATTERY CHARGER INCLUDING AN ANTI-THEFT MECHANISM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736566
Method for Detecting Impedance of Charging Cable, Electronic Device, and Power Supply Device
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12719296
SMART CONNECTION DEVICE, JUMP STARTER, AND BATTERY CLAMP
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719313
SMART WIRELESS CHARGING CONTROL SYSTEM
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706540
ELECTRIC VEHICLE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR MITIGATING TRANSIENT LOAD CONDITIONS IN LOW VOLTAGE BUSES
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+16.2%)
3y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 374 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month