Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/603,273

PRINTING METHOD

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 13, 2024
Examiner
RICHMOND, SCOTT A.
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ricoh Company Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
548 granted / 624 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 624 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to applicants arguments dated 06 February 2026. Claims 1-16 are pending in the application. Claims 1-2 have been amended. Claim 5 was cancelled. Claims 3-4 and 6-16 have previously been withdrawn. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy of Japan Application No. 2023-048109 and 2023-188562 was received on 07 May 2024 as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings filed on 13 March 2024 are accepted. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mombourquette et al. (US PGPub 2020/018295 A1), hereinafter Mombourquette. With regard to Claim 1, Mombourquette discloses a printing method (¶0013) comprising: applying a pretreatment liquid to a planned formation region of a printing liquid image and an overhang region on a target printing medium to form a pretreatment liquid image with the pretreatment liquid (Fig. 1; pretreatment area 60, image area 140; ¶0025, 0038); moving a leveling member on the pretreatment liquid image (¶0030-0031), the leveling member being one of a leveling blade or a leveling squeegee (¶0030, Teflon film sheet which flattens and smooths the textile fibers immediately following the application of the pretreatment liquid): and applying a printing liquid to the pretreatment liquid image to form the printing liquid image with the printing liquid (¶0035; Fig. 1; image area 140), wherein the overhang region is adjacent to the planned formation region of the printing liquid image and is upstream of a movement direction of the leveling member at any point in time (Fig. 1, pretreatment area 60 overhangs the image on all sides of the image region). With regard to Claim 2, Mombourquette further discloses wherein the leveling member is moved in only one direction at a specific time (¶0031). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see pages 7-8, filed 06 February 2026 with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 under 35 USC 103 are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection applied to claim 1 in this office action. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT A. RICHMOND whose telephone number is (313)446-6547. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9-6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas Rodriguez can be reached on 571-431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT A RICHMOND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 06, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600151
CUTTER AND METHOD OF SEPARATION FOR SHEETS PRINTED FROM A CONTINUOUS WEB SUSCEPTIBLE OF LONGITUDINAL DIVISIONS AND RELATIVE WEB
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594773
INKJET PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594765
PRINTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589600
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRINTING ON TILTED PRINT MEDIUM USING PRINTHEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589603
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 624 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month