Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/603,609

SEEDSHEET MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND SEEDSHEET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 13, 2024
Priority
Dec 07, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2020045441 +1 more
Examiner
MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Shuhou Co. Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
110 granted / 193 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 193 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/11/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/27/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With regard to applicant’s arguments that the germinating units of Ahm “are arranged linearly, and not in a two-dimensional pattern along a horizontal axis and a vertical axis, as recited in amended Claim 1.” The examiner asserts that the linear square pattern still exists in the two dimensions that the germinating unit is formed along a horizontal and vertical axis. The claim is being interpreted under its broadest reasonable interpretation and the rejection over Ahm is herein maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-2 & 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ahm, U.S. Patent No. 6,735,902 A1 in view of Meyers, U.S. Patent No. 3,908,308 A; herein Mey. Re claim 1, Ahm discloses a seedsheet comprising: a mounting paper (2; the length of material, fig. 1-2 & 6 and col 2; 59-13 wherein the strips are both a form of paper); and a plurality of printing elements (9/9’; the germinating units, 1-6) formed by curing a paste (col 4; 34-46, a paste formed of the glue, seeds, carriers, and additives is arranged and cured to form the individual germinating units) arranged on a surface of the mounting paper in a predetermined pattern (fig. 1-2 & 6 and col 4; 31-52 & col 5; 17-29, the rectangular shaped pattern of germinating units is applied to the upper surface of the bottom material layer), such that the plurality of printing elements have the same shape and project above the surface of the mounting paper (again see fig. 1-2 & 6 and col 4; 31-52 & col 5; 17-29, each individual germination unit has the shape rectangular shape and projects above the surface of the lower length of material), wherein the paste comprises a seed mixed with a glue (col 4; 34-46, the contents of the germinating unit is a mixture including a glue and a seed), a thickness of the plurality of printing elements is greater than a thickness of the plurality of seeds (fig. 1-2 & 6), and the printing elements are arranged in a two-dimensional pattern along a horizontal axis and a vertical axis (fig. 1-2 & 6, the germinating units extend along both a vertical and a horizonal axis, each forming a square shape). Ahm fails to disclose the paste explicitly comprising a plurality of seeds mixed with a fluid. However, Mey discloses a seedsheet (abstract, the plant marker) formulated with a paste (col 1; 56-61, a flowable paste is formed with a wax-like vehicle and the seeds) comprising a plurality of seeds (again see col 1; 56-61) mixed with a fluid containing an adhesive (col 1; 56-61, the wax-like vehicle). The only distinction between the prior art and the claimed invention is that the prior art fails to disclose the paste explicitly comprising a plurality of seeds mixed with a fluid however, Mey discloses such a paste. Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the known technique of formulating and dispensing seed mixture as taught by Mey to improve the similar device disclosed by the prior art in the same way by requiring less dispensing mechanism on the assembly line. See MPEP 2143 I. (C). Re claim 2, the combination of Ahm and Mey discloses the invention of claim 1, Ahm as modified by Mey further discloses wherein the paste contains a chemical or a fertilizer (col 2; 33-48, wherein a pesticide, water absorbing agents [chemical], or fertilizer). Re claim 5, the combination of Ahm and Mey discloses the invention of claim 1, Ahm as modified by Mey further discloses wherein each of the plurality of printing elements has a plurality of layers (best seen in fig. 2). Re claim 6, the combination of Ahm and Mey discloses the invention of claim 1, Ahm as modified by Mey further discloses wherein surfaces of the plurality of printing elements form a predetermined design pattern (best seen in fig. 1-4, the structure of the rectangular germinating units is a predetermined design pattern). Re claim 7, the combination of Ahm and Mey discloses the invention of claim 1, Mey further discloses wherein at least two printing elements among the plurality of printing elements respectively contain different kinds of seeds therein (col 2-3; 54-5, the printing elements formed of the seed-wax mixture contain a variety of different kinds of seeds). The only distinction between the prior art and the claimed invention is that the prior art fails to disclose wherein at least two printing elements among the plurality of printing elements respectively contain different kinds of seeds however, Mey discloses such a technique. Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the known technique of the varying seeds as taught by Mey to improve the similar device disclosed by the prior art in the same way by allowing for more diversity in the germination units. See MPEP 2143 I. (C). Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ahm in view of Mey as applied to claim 1 above, in further view of Otake et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,240,674 A; herein Ota. Re claim 4, the combination of Ahm and Mey discloses the invention of claim 1, the combination fails to disclose wherein the mounting paper has a plurality of positioning holes arranged along a longitudinal direction of the mounting paper the plurality of positioning holes being arranged in two lines along opposite sides of the mounting paper. However, Ota discloses a seedsheet (abstract) comprising mounting sheet (22x; the support band, fig. 1-5, 7(a)-(c), 13-21, & 25-26) having a plurality of positioning holes (27x; the feed bores, fig. 1-5, 7(a)-(c), 13-21, & 25-26) arranged along a longitudinal direction of the mounting paper the plurality of positioning holes being arranged in two lines along opposite sides of the mounting paper (fig. 1-5, 7(a)-(c), 13-21, & 25-26). The only distinction between the prior art and the claimed invention is that the prior art fails to disclose wherein the mounting paper has a plurality of positioning holes arranged along a longitudinal direction of the mounting paper the plurality of positioning holes being arranged in two lines along opposite sides of the mounting paper however, Ota discloses such a process for mechanically planting the seedsheets. Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the prior art elements of the feed bores as taught by Ota to the germination units of the prior art to yield the predictable result of loading a plurality of germination units into a feed mechanism for planting. See MPEP 2143 I. (A). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICOLE P MACCRATE whose telephone number is (571)272-5215. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua J Michener can be reached at 571-272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE PAIGE MACCRATE/Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Oct 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 13, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757882
STORAGE BOX HAVING STORAGE STRUCTURES FOR FISHING EQUIPMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12740549
PLANT FOR AQUACULTURE AND OUTLET FOR AQUACULTURE TANKS AND OTHER USES THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12714074
BEEHIVE FRAME COVER
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714084
Insect Bait Stake
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702125
A FUMIGANT VAPORISING AND DELIVERY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 193 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month