Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/604,328

CONDENSATE BYPASS SYSTEM FOR AIR CONDITIONERS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 13, 2024
Examiner
NOUKETCHA, LIONEL W
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Midea Group Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
455 granted / 566 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 566 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1-7 and 15-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 calls for the limitation “while delivering to a building either cold air in a cooling mode or warm air in a heating mode” in claim 1; which recitation renders claim 1 indefinite since the claim recites both an apparatus and the method steps of using the apparatus. It is unclear whether infringement occurs when one creates the apparatus or when one actually uses the apparatus (see MPEP 2173.05(p), In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation, 639 F.3d 1303, 1318, 97 USPQ2d 1737, 1748-49 (Fed. Cir. 2011). Appropriate correction is required. A similar issue is found in claim 15. Claim 15 should be addressed accordingly. Claim(s) 2-7 and 16-20 is/are indefinite for their dependency on an indefinite base claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-14 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The combination of elements as set forth in independent claim 8 is not disclosed or made obvious by the prior art of record. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIONEL W NOUKETCHA whose telephone number is (571)272-8438. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon - Fri: 08:00 AM - 04:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frantz Jules can be reached on 571-272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIONEL NOUKETCHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 23, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 30, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590737
REFRIGERATION CYCLE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588167
AIR CONDITIONER USING WATER VAPOR REFRIGERANT FOR MODULAR DATA CENTER AND DATA CENTER COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571582
HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE HAVING AN AMBIENT LIGHT DETECTION UNIT AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566012
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO AVOID MIXED AIR CONDENSATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558943
AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 566 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month