Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/604,651

ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH DYNAMIC RESOURCE CONTROL POLICY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
FAN, CHIEH M
Art Unit
2632
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Mediatek INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
11%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
4%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 11% of cases
11%
Career Allow Rate
2 granted / 18 resolved
-50.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
23
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 18 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 8-18 are objected to because of the following reasons, and appropriate correction is required. -Each of claims 8, 11 and 14 recites the limitation “the logic circuit”. Said limitation is lack of antecedent basis. It suggests, and hereafter assumed, that in the claim, the limitation “The electronic device as claimed in claim 6” is changed to -- The electronic device as claimed in claim 7--. -Claim(s), (if any) depended on above claims, are therefore also objected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Homchaudhuri et al (2015/0346807). -Regarding claim 1, Homchaudhuri et al teaches an electronic device “wireless communication device 115-b”, [0071]), the device (see figure 6B) comprising: a modem (605, 610, 615, 630) performed for a modulation scheme (represented by “MCS”, [0004] or “modem 515”, [0056]) and, configured to receive, via (605), a control signal (“control information”, [0069]), and send out, via (610), a resource request (being a communication signal comprising the control signal from (610) to (620-a) based on the control signal (see [0046, 0069, 0074]) when the modem determines to operate in a dynamic mode (“desired power mode” , [0074]) for scheduling to turn on/off a plurality of resources (referred to “components thereof”, [0069]) (see [0054, 0069, 0074]); and a system power controller (620-a), configured to receive the resource request from the modem, and to supply, in accordance to a power scheme (“power scheme”, [0074]), power (“voltages and/or currents”, [0069]) to at least one of the plurality of resources based on the resource request (see [0069, 0074]), wherein the modem comprises a modem power controller (630), configured to determine, for each of the plurality of resources, whether to operate in the dynamic mode (see [0069, 0074]), and output an enabled signal (represented by the power scheme outputted from the modem power controller), based on the determination for each of the plurality of resources (see [0069, 0074]), wherein the control signal is generated based on different requirements on each of the plurality of resources, in a manner that the control signal comprises a modulation and coding scheme (MSC) value (“modulation and coding scheme (MSC) value”, [0014]), e.g., a MSC value (“MCS6”, [0051]), which indicates requirements (being required power status) on each of the plurality of resources (see [0051]) . -Regarding claim 3, Homchaudhuri et al teaches that the control signal is generated by base station (“base station 135”, [0038]) with a processor (“processor”, [0098]) executing dynamic resource-control software (“software”, [0098]) being a software for dynamic resource control (see [0012, 0038, 0098]). -Regarding claim 4, Homchaudhuri et al teaches that each of the resources can be, or namely can comprise, a bus phase-locked loop (PLL) (“PLL”, 0051]), a clock (“XTAL”, [0051]) or a power management integrated circuit (“LDO”, [0051]), (see [0051]). -Regarding claim 5, Homchaudhuri et al teaches that the modem is configured to receive configurations (being the control signal) from a base station (“base station 135”, [0038]) through a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) (“PDCCH”, [0012]) , (see [0012, 0038]). -Regarding claim 6, Homchaudhuri et al teaches that the modem power controller is configurable to: output the enabled signal for at least one of the plurality of resources when determining to operate in the dynamic mode (see [0069, 0074]); and output the disabled signal (being power down signal(s)) for the one of the plurality of resources (referred to “certain components”, [0037]) to power down the one of the plurality of resources when determining to operate in a static mode (“network sleep mode”, [0037]) (see [0037]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 7, 19 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 8-18 would be allowable if rewritten, as suggested, to overcome the objection(s), set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUONG M PHU whose telephone number is (571)272-3009. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-16:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh Fan can be reached at 571-272-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUONG PHU/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 04, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent null
METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR HIGH-SPEED TRANSMISSION
Granted
Patent null
CONSTELLATION REARRANGEMENT FOR ARQ TRANSMIT DIVERSITY SCHEMES
Granted
Patent null
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING TIMING OFFSET IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Granted
Patent null
BLOCK-CODED GROUP MODULATION METHOD AND TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER USING THE SAME
Granted
Patent null
X-mimo systems with multi-transmitters and multi-receivers
Granted
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
11%
Grant Probability
4%
With Interview (-7.4%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 18 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month